World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
22266
World Ranking
3193
National Ranking
1232

Keith C. Clarke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith C. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 198 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Keith C. Clarke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith C. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Keith C. Clarke is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within environmental science and social sciences, focusing on areas such as land use, ecosystem services, and spatial dynamics.

The main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Social Sciences

Within these, Clarke has contributed to several subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Their research covers a variety of topics, with notable emphasis on:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Geographic Information Systems Studies
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Remote Sensing and Land Use

Among recent publications attributed to Clarke are:

  • "Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China," 2020, published in Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • "Mixed-cell cellular automata: A new approach for simulating the spatio-temporal dynamics of mixed land use structures," 2020, published in Landscape and Urban Planning
  • "Spatiotemporal event detection: a review," 2020, published in International Journal of Digital Earth
  • "Methodological Issues of Spatial Agent-Based Models," 2020, published in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • "Dynamics of spatial relationships among ecosystem services and their determinants: Implications for land use system reform in Northwestern China," 2021, published in Land Use Policy

Keith C. Clarke frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • Cartography and Geographic Information Science
  • Scientific Data

Their work has involved collaborations with a number of coauthors, including:

  • J. Michael Johnson
  • Xun Liang
  • Qingfeng Guan
  • Erica Akemi Goto
  • Yao Yao

In recognition of their contributions, Clarke was named Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area

    K C Clarke;S Hoppen;L Gaydos

  • Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore.

    Keith C. Clarke;Leonard J. Gaydos

  • The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling

    Martin Herold;Noah C. Goldstein;Keith C. Clarke

  • Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: A case study in Wuhan, China

    Xun Liang;Xun Liang;Qingfeng Guan;Keith C. Clarke;Shishi Liu

  • Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change

    Robert Gilmore Pontius;Wideke Boersma;Jean-Christophe Castella;Keith Clarke

  • The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change

    Martin Herold;Helen Couclelis;Keith C. Clarke

  • Getting Started with GIS

    Keith Clarke

  • The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses

    Martin Herold;Joseph Scepan;Keith C Clarke

  • Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal

    E.A Silva;K.C Clarke

  • Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment

    J. C J H Aerts;W. J. Botzen;W. J. Botzen;W. J. Botzen;K. C. Clarke;S. L. Cutter

  • Spatial Metrics and Image Texture for Mapping Urban Land Use

    Martin Herold;XiaoHang Liu;Keith C. Clarke

  • An improved simple morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data

    Thomas J. Pingel;Keith C. Clarke;William A. McBride

  • Spatio-temporal dynamics in California's Central Valley: Empirical links to urban theory

    Charles Dietzel;Martin Herold;Jeffrey J. Hemphill;Keith C. Clarke

  • The Use of Scenarios in Land-Use Planning

    Wei-Ning Xiang;Keith C Clarke

  • Toward Optimal Calibration of the SLEUTH Land Use Change Model

    Unknown

  • Getting Started with Geographic Information Systems

    Keith C. Clarke

  • A Cellular Automaton Model of Wildfire Propagation and Extinction

    Keith C. Clarke;James A. Brass;Phillip J. Riggan

  • The SLEUTH Land Use Change Model: A Review

    Gargi Chaudhuri;Keith Clarke

  • Assessing the effects of land use spatial structure on urban heat islands using HJ-1B remote sensing imagery in Wuhan, China

    Hao Wu;Hao Wu;Lu Ping Ye;Wen Zhong Shi;Keith C. Clarke

  • Diffusion and Coalescence of the Houston Metropolitan Area: Evidence Supporting a New Urban Theory:

    Charles Dietzel;Hakan Oguz;Jeffery J Hemphill;Keith C Clarke

  • Using a cellular automaton model to forecast the effects of urban growth on habitat pattern in southern California

    Alexandra D. Syphard;Keith C. Clarke;Janet Franklin

  • The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting

    Charles Dietzel;Keith C. Clarke

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Herold
Martin Herold Wageningen University & Research
Piotr Jankowski
Piotr Jankowski San Diego State University
Michael F. Goodchild
Michael F. Goodchild University of California, Santa Barbara
Wenzhong Shi
Wenzhong Shi Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Douglas A. Stow
Douglas A. Stow San Diego State University
Alexandra D. Syphard
Alexandra D. Syphard Conservation Biology Institute
Jason Dykes
Jason Dykes City, University of London
Dar A. Roberts
Dar A. Roberts University of California, Santa Barbara
Jo Wood
Jo Wood City, University of London
Edward A. Keller
Edward A. Keller University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary online degrees that complement this field. For those interested in the Earth's physical structure and processes, earning an online geoscience degree provides foundational knowledge and technical skills applicable in environmental consulting, resource management, and hazard assessment.

With the growing reliance on spatial data for environmental planning and decision-making, a geographic information systems degree is increasingly valuable. This degree equips students to analyze and visualize environmental patterns, supporting careers in conservation, urban planning, and resource management.

To complement technical expertise with leadership and policy skills, some professionals pursue a mpa one year program. This degree offers efficient training in public administration, enabling graduates to influence environmental policies and manage public sector projects effectively.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in addressing environmental challenges. An online best online sociology bachelor degree enhances insight into human behaviors and societal structures that impact environmental action and sustainability efforts.

Together, these related degrees provide a well-rounded foundation for diverse career pathways, from scientific research to policy development and community engagement in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Keith C. Clarke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles