World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
9416
World Ranking
8261
National Ranking
3543

Piotr Jankowski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Jankowski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Piotr Jankowski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piotr Jankowski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Piotr Jankowski is affiliated with San Diego State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Environmental Science, with notable focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Geography, Planning and Development, Transportation, Artificial Intelligence, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work engages deeply with topics such as Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Geographic Information Systems Studies, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis, Urban Transport and Accessibility, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, and Smart Cities and Technologies.

Jankowski's recent publications include:

  • "Smart city re-imagined: City planning and GeoAI in the age of big data," 2022, Journal of Urban Management
  • "Digitalization and Sustainability: A Call for a Digital Green Deal," 2023, Environmental Science & Policy
  • "Emerging trends and research frontiers in spatial multicriteria analysis," 2020, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • "'One Size Does Not Fit All': A Roadmap of Purpose-Driven Mixed-Method Pathways for Sensitivity Analysis of Agent-Based Models," 2020, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • "Geodiversity assessment with global and local spatial multicriteria analysis," 2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jankowski include Alicja Najwer, Zbigniew Zwoliński, Reza Mortaheb, Arika Ligmann-Zielińska, and Jacek Niesterowicz.

Their research has been published multiple times in key venues, such as ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Journal of Urban Management, Environmental Science & Policy, and International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation.

Best Publications

  • Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods

    Piotr Jankowski

  • Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda

    G. Andrienko;N. Andrienko;P. Jankowski;D. Keim

  • GIS for Group Decision Making

    Piotr Jankowski;Timothy Nyerges

  • A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping

    Bakhtiar Feizizadeh;Majid Shadman Roodposhti;Piotr Jankowski;Thomas Blaschke

  • Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making

    Piotr Jankowski;Natalia V. Andrienko;Gennady L. Andrienko

  • Integration of GIS-Based Suitability Analysis and Multicriteria Evaluation in a Spatial Decision Support System for Route Selection

    P Jankowski;L Richard

  • Towards Participatory Geographic Information Systems for community-based environmental decision making.

    Piotr Jankowski

  • A GIS based spatially-explicit sensitivity and uncertainty analysis approach for multi-criteria decision analysis

    Bakhtiar Feizizadeh;Piotr Jankowski;Thomas Blaschke

  • Spatial group choice: a SDSS tool for collaborative spatial decision- making

    Piotr Jankowski;Timothy L. Nyerges;Alan Smith;T. J. Moore

  • GIS-Supported Collaborative Decision Making: Results of an Experiment

    Piotr Jankowski;Timothy Nyerges

  • Geographic information systems for group decision making : towards a participatory, geographic information science

    Piotr Jankowski;Timothy L. Nyerges

  • Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation

    Arika Ligmann-Zielinska;Richard L. Church;Piotr Jankowski

  • Slope length calculations from a DEM within ARC/INFO grid

    Robert Hickey;Alan Smith;Piotr Jankowski

  • Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard

    Pece V. Gorsevski;Paul E. Gessler;Piotr Jankowski

  • Spatial Decision Support Systems: Three decades on

    Peter Bernard Keenan;Piotr Jankowski;Piotr Jankowski

  • Regional and Urban GIS: A Decision Support Approach

    Timothy L. Nyerges;Piotr Jankowski

  • An heuristic approach for mapping landslide hazard by integrating fuzzy logic with analytic hierarchy process

    Pece V. Gorsevski;Piotr Jankowski;Paul E. Gessler

  • Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation

    Arika Ligmann-Zielinska;Piotr Jankowski;Piotr Jankowski

  • Thematic Patterns in Georeferenced Tweets through Space-Time Visual Analytics

    G. Andrienko;N. Andrienko;H. Bosch;T. Ertl

  • An optimized solution of multi-criteria evaluation analysis of landslide susceptibility using fuzzy sets and Kalman filter

    Pece V. Gorsevski;Piotr Jankowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Natalia Andrienko
Natalia Andrienko Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems
Gennady Andrienko
Gennady Andrienko Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems
Paul E. Gessler
Paul E. Gessler University of Idaho
Thomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke University of Salzburg
Keith C. Clarke
Keith C. Clarke University of California, Santa Barbara
Artur Ciesielski
Artur Ciesielski University of Strasbourg
Menno-Jan Kraak
Menno-Jan Kraak University of Twente
Richard L. Church
Richard L. Church University of California, Santa Barbara
Maciej Kubicki
Maciej Kubicki Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Jiaping Wu
Jiaping Wu Zhejiang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up diverse career pathways for students interested in Computer Science and related fields. Many students start by seeking the easy online associate degrees that allow them to gain foundational skills quickly and affordably before transferring to a bachelor’s program or entering the workforce.

For those interested in leadership roles or academia, pursuing the best online edd programs is a strategic option. These programs prepare students for advanced positions in education, policy, and administration with the added flexibility of online learning.

It's important to consider program quality when choosing where to study. Some of the best online degree programs are nationally accredited and recognized for delivering rigorous education in a flexible format, making them ideal for remote learners and working professionals alike.

Specialized fields such as gaming are also accessible online. Those with a creative and technical bent can enroll in the video game design degree to explore careers in a rapidly growing industry. With so many options available online, students can tailor their studies to meet their career goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Piotr Jankowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles