World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
8164
World Ranking
2994
National Ranking
123

Stan Geertman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stan Geertman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stan Geertman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stan Geertman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stan Geertman is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans various domains within social sciences and engineering, with a particular focus on urban and planning sciences.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to smart cities, urban mobility, and governance. Several recent papers include:

  • Planning support science: Developments and challenges, 2020, Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • Smart urban governance: an alternative to technocratic "smartness", 2020, GeoJournal
  • Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study, 2020, Local Government Studies
  • Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap, 2020, Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • The shifting position of homeowners in flood resilience: From recipients to key-stakeholders, 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stan Geertman include:

  • Patrick Witte
  • Huaxiong Jiang
  • Yanliu Lin
  • Haozhi Pan
  • Thomas Hartmann

Publications are often presented in well-known venues, where Geertman has multiple contributions:

  • Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
  • Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • Journal of Urban Technology
  • Urban Planning
  • Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

Stan Geertman's research integrates main fields of study in social sciences and engineering. Subfields focus primarily on:

  • Transportation
  • Media Technology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Key thematic topics explored in their work include:

  • Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • E-Government and Public Services
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Among their academic contributions is the book Urban Informatics and Future Cities, published in 2021 through Springer International Publishing. This work contributes to the understanding of urban data and technology integration for future city development.

Best Publications

  • GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning

    Stan C. M. Geertman;Jan R. Ritsema Van Eck

  • Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems

    Guido Vonk;Stan Geertman;Paul Schot

  • Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice

    Stan C. M. Geertman;John Stillwell

  • The development and redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen

    Pu Hao;Richard Sliuzas;Stan Geertman

  • Planning Support Systems in Practice

    Stan Geertman;John Stillwell

  • Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review

    Zsuzsanna Tomor;Albert Meijer;Ank Michels;Stan Geertman

  • Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods

    Stan Geertman;John Stillwell

  • Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices

    Maarit Kahila-Tani;Marketta Kytta;Stan Geertman

  • Participatory Planning and GIS: A PSS to Bridge the Gap

    Stan Geertman

  • Potentials for Planning Support: A Planning-Conceptual Approach:

    Stan Geertman

  • Exploring urban metabolism—Towards an interdisciplinary perspective

    Martin Dijst;Ernst Worrell;Lars Böcker;Paul Brunner

  • A SWOT Analysis of Planning Support Systems

    Guido Vonk;Stan Geertman;Paul Schot

  • Geographical Information and Planning

    John C. H. Stillwell;Stan Geertman;Stan Openshaw

  • The added value of Planning Support Systems: A practitioner’s perspective

    Peter Pelzer;Stan C. M. Geertman;Rob van der Heijden;Etiënne Rouwette

  • Spatial Analyses of the Urban Village Development Process in Shenzhen, China

    Pu Hao;Stan Geertman;Pieter Hooimeijer;Richard Sliuzas

  • Planning Support Systems: An Introduction

    Stan Geertman;John Stillwell

  • Improving the Adoption and Use of Planning Support Systems in Practice

    Guido Vonk;Stan Geertman

  • Spatial externalities, neighbourhood rules and CA land-use modelling

    Michel Hagoort;Stan Geertman;Henk Ottens

  • Core Principles and Concepts in Land-Use Modelling: A Literature Review

    Jonas van Schrojenstein Lantman;Peter H. Verburg;Arnold Bregt;Stan Geertman

  • New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo‐Information Technologies in Dutch Public Organizations

    Guido Vonk;Stan Geertman;Paul Schot

  • Planning support systems and smart cities

    Stan Geertman;Joseph Ferreira;Robert Goodspeed;John Stillwell

  • Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development

    Stan Geertman;Fred Toppen;John Stillwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Dijst
Martin Dijst Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
Frank van Oort
Frank van Oort Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert van der Heijden
Robert van der Heijden Bruker Nederland
Albert Meijer
Albert Meijer Utrecht University
Arnold K. Bregt
Arnold K. Bregt Wageningen University & Research
Stan Openshaw
Stan Openshaw University of Leeds
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marco Helbich
Marco Helbich Utrecht University
Albert A. M. Holtslag
Albert A. M. Holtslag Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities? Online programs are making it easier than ever to earn degrees while balancing work, family, or other commitments. Many students are turning to msw online programs that are both affordable and flexible, helping prepare future social workers for roles in schools, healthcare, and community organizations.

For those interested in behavior analysis, bcba masters programs online offer pathways to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, focusing on supporting individuals with behavioral challenges in educational or clinical settings.

Short on time? accelerated msw online options allow you to complete your Master of Social Work faster, with the same rigorous curriculum. Similarly, a fastest online psychology degree makes it possible to graduate quickly, providing flexible entry points into counseling, research, or human resources.

With these online degrees, you can access high-quality education and unlock diverse career pathways, all with the convenience of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Stan Geertman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles