World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
77
Citations
25942
World Ranking
1259
National Ranking
33

Holger R. Maier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger R. Maier sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 297 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Holger R. Maier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Holger R. Maier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Holger R. Maier is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and focuses their research primarily on environmental science and engineering. Their work spans multiple subfields, including global and planetary change, water science and technology, ocean engineering, environmental engineering, and civil and structural engineering.

The scientist's research topics include hydrology and watershed management studies, water resources management and optimization, flood risk assessment and management, hydrological forecasting using artificial intelligence, water-energy-food nexus studies, water systems and optimization, and reservoir engineering and simulation methods.

Holger R. Maier has contributed numerous publications to various academic venues. Frequent places of publication include:

  • Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Water Resources Research
  • MODSIM2021, 24th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Holger R. Maier are:

  • "The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support" (2020) published in Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "Explainable artificial intelligence in disaster risk management: Achievements and prospective futures" (2023) in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
  • "Exploding the myths: An introduction to artificial neural networks for prediction and forecasting" (2023) in Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "Water quality modeling in sewer networks: Review and future research directions" (2021) in Water Research
  • "Anthropocene flooding: Challenges for science and society" (2020) in Hydrological Processes

Holger R. Maier collaborates frequently with a number of researchers in their field. Notable co-authors include Aaron C. Zecchin, Seth Westra, Mark Thyer, Hedwig van Delden, and Hoshin V. Gupta, with collaboration counts ranging from 12 to 19 publications each.

Best Publications

  • Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications

    Holger R. Maier;Graeme C. Dandy

  • Review: Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions

    Holger R. Maier;Ashu Jain;Graeme C. Dandy;K. P. Sudheer

  • Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management

    Rebecca A. Kelly;Anthony J. Jakeman;Olivier Barreteau;Mark E. Borsuk

  • The Use of Artificial Neural Networks for the Prediction of Water Quality Parameters

    Holger R. Maier;Graeme C. Dandy

  • Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources

    H.R. Maier;Z. Kapelan;J. Kasprzyk;J. Kollat

  • Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology

    Gavin J. Bowden;Graeme C. Dandy;Holger R. Maier

  • Ant Colony Optimization for Design of Water Distribution Systems

    Holger R. Maier;Angus R. Simpson;Aaron C. Zecchin;Wai Kuan Foong

  • Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making

    J. C. Ascough;H. R. Maier;J. K. Ravalico;M. W. Strudley

  • The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support

    Saman Razavi;Anthony Jakeman;Andrea Saltelli;Clémentine Prieur

  • An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation

    H.R. Maier;J.H.A. Guillaume;H. van Delden;G.A. Riddell

  • Artificial neural network applications in geotechnical engineering

    Mohamed A. Shahin;Mark B. Jaksa;Holger R. Maier

  • PREDICTING SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS USING NEURAL NETWORKS

    Mohamed A. Shahin;Holger R. Maier;Mark B. Jaksa

  • Review of Input Variable Selection Methods for Artificial Neural Networks

    Robert May;Graeme Dandy;Holger Maier

  • DATA DIVISION FOR DEVELOPING NEURAL NETWORKS APPLIED TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING

    Mohamed A. Shahin;Holger R. Maier;Mark B. Jaksa

  • Optimal division of data for neural network models in water resources applications

    Gavin J. Bowden;Holger R. Maier;Graeme C. Dandy

  • Non-linear variable selection for artificial neural networks using partial mutual information

    Robert J. May;Holger R. Maier;Graeme C. Dandy;T.M.K. Gayani Fernando

  • Review: Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modelling

    Wenyan Wu;Graeme C. Dandy;Holger R. Maier

  • The effect of internal parameters and geometry on the performance of back-propagation neural networks: an empirical study

    Holger R. Maier;Graeme C. Dandy

  • Genetic Algorithms for Reliability-Based Optimization of Water Distribution Systems

    Bryan A. Tolson;Holger R. Maier;Angus R. Simpson;Barbara J. Lence

  • Introductory overview: Optimization using evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics

    H.R. Maier;S. Razavi;Z. Kapelan;Z. Kapelan;L.S. Matott

  • An uncertain future, deep uncertainty, scenarios, robustness and adaptation: How do they fit together?

    H. R. Maier;J.H.A. Guillaume;H. van Delden;G.A. Riddell

Frequent Co-Authors

Graeme C. Dandy
Graeme C. Dandy University of Adelaide
Angus R. Simpson
Angus R. Simpson University of Adelaide
Aaron C. Zecchin
Aaron C. Zecchin University of Adelaide
Seth Westra
Seth Westra University of Adelaide
Mohamed A. Shahin
Mohamed A. Shahin Curtin University
Martin F. Lambert
Martin F. Lambert University of Adelaide
Andrea Castelletti
Andrea Castelletti Polytechnic University of Milan
Craig T. Simmons
Craig T. Simmons University of Newcastle Australia
Zoran Kapelan
Zoran Kapelan Delft University of Technology
Jan H. Kwakkel
Jan H. Kwakkel Delft University of Technology

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up many flexible and rewarding career paths for students interested in Computer Science. For those seeking practical skills and fast entry into the workforce, there are various easy degrees that pay well in technology and related fields.

Artificial intelligence is a booming sector, and pursuing the best online master's in artificial intelligence can significantly boost your credentials and job prospects. Online options make it easier for working professionals to upskill while maintaining their current jobs.

It’s important to consider what are the best college degrees for long-term success. Many of these majors emphasize computing, data analytics, and engineering — all fields with high demand for skilled graduates.

If you’re looking for an efficient path, several easy masters degrees online make it possible to earn an advanced credential more quickly, often with flexible schedules and lower overall costs.

Best Scientists Citing Holger R. Maier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles