World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
13567
World Ranking
5256
National Ranking
2423

Jon E. Froehlich publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon E. Froehlich sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 144 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jon E. Froehlich D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon E. Froehlich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Jon E. Froehlich is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields with notable contributions in computer science and social sciences, producing 19 and 16 publications respectively in these areas. Their work focuses extensively on the intersection of technology and accessibility.

The scientist's main research topics cover:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Traffic and Road Safety

Froehlich's subfields of study include:

  • Transportation
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Froehlich include:

  • What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"? A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ProtoSound: A Personalized and Scalable Sound Recognition System for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Users, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Urban Accessibility as a Socio-Political Problem, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Toward User-Driven Sound Recognizer Personalization with People Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of Hearing, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • Visualizing Urban Accessibility: Investigating Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives through a Map-based Design Probe Study, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Frequent coauthors working alongside Froehlich include:

  • Leah Findlater
  • Dhruv Jain
  • Michael Saugstad
  • Emma J. McDonnell
  • Steven M. Goodman

In 2017, Froehlich received the distinction of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden

    Sunny Consolvo;David W. McDonald;Tammy Toscos;Mike Y. Chen

  • The design of eco-feedback technology

    Jon Froehlich;Leah Findlater;James Landay

  • UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits

    Jon Froehlich;Tawanna Dillahunt;Predrag Klasnja;Jennifer Mankoff

  • MyExperience: a system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones

    Jon Froehlich;Mike Y. Chen;Sunny Consolvo;Beverly Harrison

  • Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Shaun K. Kane;Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Susumu Harada

  • Flowers or a robot army?: encouraging awareness & activity with personal, mobile displays

    Sunny Consolvo;Predrag Klasnja;David W. McDonald;Daniel Avrahami

  • Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling

    Jon Froehlich;Joachim Neumann;Nuria Oliver

  • Disaggregated End-Use Energy Sensing for the Smart Grid

    J Froehlich;E Larson;S Gupta;G Cohn

  • Mind the theoretical gap: interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research

    Eric B. Hekler;Predrag Klasnja;Jon E. Froehlich;Matthew P. Buman

  • Route Prediction from Trip Observations

    Jon Froehlich;John Krumm

  • What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019

    Kelly Mack;Emma McDonnell;Dhruv Jain;Lucy Lu Wang

  • Unifying artifacts and activities in a visual tool for distributed software development teams

    Jon Froehlich;Paul Dourish

  • HydroSense: infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity

    Jon E. Froehlich;Eric Larson;Tim Campbell;Conor Haggerty

  • Combining crowdsourcing and google street view to identify street-level accessibility problems

    Kotaro Hara;Vicki Le;Jon Froehlich

  • Are GSM Phones THE Solution for Localization

    A. Varshavsky;Mike Y. Chen;E. de Lara;J. Froehlich

  • The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data

    Jon Froehlich;Leah Findlater;Marilyn Ostergren;Solai Ramanathan

  • Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input

    Leah Findlater;Jon E. Froehlich;Kays Fattal;Jacob O. Wobbrock

  • Seeking the source: software source code as a social and technical artifact

    Cleidson de Souza;Jon Froehlich;Paul Dourish

  • Social fabric fitness: the design and evaluation of wearable E-textile displays to support group running

    Matthew Mauriello;Michael Gubbels;Jon E. Froehlich

  • Improving Public Transit Accessibility for Blind Riders by Crowdsourcing Bus Stop Landmark Locations with Google Street View: An Extended Analysis

    Kotaro Hara;Shiri Azenkot;Megan Campbell;Cynthia L. Bennett

  • Improving public transit accessibility for blind riders by crowdsourcing bus stop landmark locations with Google street view

    Kotaro Hara;Shiri Azenkot;Megan Campbell;Cynthia L. Bennett

Frequent Co-Authors

Leah Findlater
Leah Findlater University of Washington
Shwetak N. Patel
Shwetak N. Patel University of Washington
James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
James Fogarty
James Fogarty University of Washington
Sunny Consolvo
Sunny Consolvo Google (United States)
Beverly L. Harrison
Beverly L. Harrison Microsoft (United States)
Mike Y. Chen
Mike Y. Chen National Taiwan University
Predrag Klasnja
Predrag Klasnja University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rama Chellappa
Rama Chellappa Johns Hopkins University
Les Atlas
Les Atlas University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in computer science opens the door to numerous career paths, but it's also worth exploring related disciplines and flexible learning options. With the growth of remote education, students now have the opportunity to pursue computer science alongside other technical majors that align with their interests and career goals.

For those seeking a fast-track to the tech industry, a computer science accelerated program delivers a rigorous curriculum in a shorter timeframe, helping you launch your career quickly.

If you are interested in applying your skills to address environmental challenges, you might want to explore what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. Careers in this field can range from research and consulting to roles in government agencies or private industry.

Engineering degrees, such as the online environmental engineering degree or the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online, combine foundational science with real-world problem solving. These options provide affordable and accessible pathways if you wish to broaden your expertise or pivot your career within STEM fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jon E. Froehlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles