World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Suzana Dragićević

Suzana Dragićević

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5776
World Ranking
11227
National Ranking
441

Suzana Dragićević publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzana Dragićević sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Suzana Dragićević D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzana Dragićević sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Suzana Dragićević is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Social Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Building and Construction.

Their research covers a range of topics, notably Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Geographic Information Systems Studies, Soil and Land Suitability Analysis, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications, Urban Design and Spatial Analysis, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making.

Recent publications include:

  • "Complex spatial networks: Theory and geospatial applications" (2020) - Geography Compass
  • "Representing Complex Evolving Spatial Networks: Geographic Network Automata" (2020) - ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • "NEAT approach for testing and validation of geospatial network agent-based model processes: case study of influenza spread" (2020) - International Journal of Geographical Information Systems
  • "GIS-based Logic Scoring of Preference method for urban densification suitability analysis" (2021) - Computers Environment and Urban Systems
  • "Modelling global urban land-use change process using spherical cellular automata" (2022) - GeoJournal

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Alysha van Duynhoven
  • Taylor Anderson
  • Bright Addae
  • Sisi Zlatanova
  • G. Sithole

Their work is published frequently in several academic venues such as:

  • Transactions in GIS
  • ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Land
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • Geocarto International

Best Publications

  • Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges

    Songnian Li;Suzana Dragicevic;Francesc Antón Castro;Monika Sester

  • An agent-based approach for modeling dynamics of contagious disease spread

    Liliana Perez;Suzana Dragicevic

  • Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements

    Shivanand Balram;Suzana Dragićević

  • iCity: A GIS-CA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making

    D. Stevens;S. Dragicevic;K. Rothley

  • Geospatial Big Data Handling Theory and Methods: A Review and Research Challenges

    S. Li;S. Dragicevic;F. Anton;M. Sester

  • Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach

    Verda Kocabas;Suzana Dragicevic

  • The potential of Web-based GIS

    Suzana Dragićević

  • Modeling urban growth using a variable grid cellular automaton

    Jasper van Vliet;Roger White;Suzana Dragicevic

  • Design and implementation of an integrated GIS-based cellular automata model to characterize forest fire behaviour

    S. Yassemi;S. Dragićević;M. Schmidt

  • A GIS-Based Irregular Cellular Automata Model of Land-Use Change:

    Daniel Stevens;Suzana Dragićević

  • GIS-Based Multicriteria Evaluation and Fuzzy Sets to Identify Priority Sites for Marine Protection

    Louisa J. Wood;Suzana Dragicevic

  • A Web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processes

    Suzana Dragićević;Shivanand Balram

  • Collaborative geographic information systems

    Shivanand Balram;Suzana Dragićević

  • A GIS-based Logic Scoring of Preference method for evaluation of land capability and suitability for agriculture

    Bryn Montgomery;Suzana Dragićević;Jozo Dujmović;Margaret Schmidt

  • GIS-based multicriteria evaluation with multiscale analysis to characterize urban landslide susceptibility in data-scarce environments

    Suzana Dragićević;Terence Lai;Shivanand Balram

  • A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities

    Shivanand Balram;Suzana Dragićević;Thomas Meredith

  • A fuzzy-constrained cellular automata model of forest insect infestations

    Christopher Bone;Suzana Dragicevic;Arthur Roberts

  • Implications of error and uncertainty for an environmental planning scenario: A sensitivity analysis of GIS-based variables in a reserve design exercise

    Charlene Rae;Kristina Rothley;Suzana Dragicevic

  • A fuzzy set approach for modelling time in GIS

    Suzana Dragicevic;Danielle J. Marceau

  • Enhancing a GIS Cellular Automata Model of Land Use Change: Bayesian Networks, Influence Diagrams and Causality

    Verda Kocabas;Suzana Dragicevic

  • Collaborative Geographic Information Systems: Origins, Boundaries, and Structures

    Shivanand Balram;Suzana Dragicevic

  • Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Agent-Based Modeling Techniques for Simulating Social and Ecological Processes

    Shivanand Balram;Suzana Dragićević

  • Internet GIS: Distributed Geographic Information Services for the Internet and Wireless Networks

    Suzana Dragicevic;Shivanand Balram

Frequent Co-Authors

Sisi Zlatanova
Sisi Zlatanova University of New South Wales
Alfred Stein
Alfred Stein University of Twente
Monika Sester
Monika Sester University of Hannover
Bin Jiang
Bin Jiang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stephan Winter
Stephan Winter University of Melbourne
Jean-Claude Thill
Jean-Claude Thill University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Nicholas A. Phelps
Nicholas A. Phelps University of Melbourne
Nadine Schuurman
Nadine Schuurman Simon Fraser University
Jasper van Vliet
Jasper van Vliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Isabelle M. Côté
Isabelle M. Côté Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can open diverse and flexible career opportunities in computer science and related fields. An associate's degree online can be a practical starting point for students looking to enter the tech industry quickly or who wish to build a foundation before pursuing a bachelor’s degree.

Cost is a common concern for many students. Attending one of the most affordable online colleges helps minimize student debt while still providing quality education and support services. Additionally, for those with academic challenges, there are accessible online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, making it possible for more students to advance their credentials.

Computer science isn’t the only pathway—students may wish to branch into other STEM fields as well. For example, there are various jobs for environmental science majors that combine technology with real-world problem solving. Exploring these pathways can broaden your career prospects and help tailor your education to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Suzana Dragićević

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles