World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 61 3055 2894 378 361 124 14504

I. Karen Temple publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by I. Karen Temple between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. I. Karen Temple published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 4 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1991 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
I. Karen Temple: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 5
2005 8
2006 3
2007 4
2008 7
2009 4
2010 7
2011 6
2012 10
2013 9
2014 12
2015 10
2016 9
2017 8
2018 6
2019 8
2020 4
2021 5
2022 7
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 156
Download as CSV

I. Karen Temple publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. Karen Temple sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 124 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203 124
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

I. Karen Temple D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. Karen Temple sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175 61
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

I. Karen Temple is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a focused contribution to Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, as well as Oncology.

Their work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Genomic Variations and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • RNA Modifications and Cancer
  • Tumors and Oncological Cases
  • Kruppel-like Factors Research

They have published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • "DNA Methylation Signature for EZH2 Functionally Classifies Sequence Variants in Three PRC2 Complex Genes" (2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • "Trans-acting genetic variants causing multilocus imprinting disturbance (MLID): common mechanisms and consequences" (2022, Clinical Epigenetics)
  • "Activating mutations in BRAF disrupt the hypothalamo-pituitary axis leading to hypopituitarism in mice and humans" (2021, Nature Communications)
  • "First step towards a consensus strategy for multi-locus diagnostic testing of imprinting disorders" (2022, Clinical Epigenetics)
  • "Phenotype of genetically confirmed Silver-Russell syndrome beyond childhood" (2020, Journal of Medical Genetics)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with I. Karen Temple include:

  • Deborah Mackay
  • Justin H. Davies
  • Irène Netchine
  • Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe
  • Jenny Child

Key publication venues for their work highlight recurring contributions to:

  • Clinical Epigenetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics

Best Publications

  • Activating Mutations in the Gene Encoding the ATP-Sensitive Potassium-Channel Subunit Kir6.2 and Permanent Neonatal Diabetes

    Anna L Gloyn;Ewan R. Pearson;Jennifer F. Antcliff;Peter Proks

  • Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57

    Deborah J G Mackay;Deborah J G Mackay;Jonathan L A Callaway;Jonathan L A Callaway;Sophie M Marks;Helen E White

  • Highly conserved non-coding elements on either side of SOX9 associated with Pierre Robin sequence.

    Sabina Benko;Judy A. Fantes;Jeanne Amiel;Dirk Jan Kleinjan

  • Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data

    J Kaplanis;K E Samocha;L Wiel;Z Zhang

  • Diagnosis and management of Silver–Russell syndrome: first international consensus statement

    Emma L. Wakeling;Frédéric Brioude;Frédéric Brioude;Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Susan M. O'Connell

  • Clinical features and natural history of Beckwith‐Wiedemann syndrome: presentation of 74 new cases

    Margaret Elliott;Rosemary Bayly;Trevor Cole;I. Karen Temple

  • Genotype-Phenotype Associations in Sotos Syndrome: An Analysis of 266 Individuals with NSD1 Aberrations

    Katrina Tatton-Brown;Jenny Douglas;Kim Coleman;Geneviève Baujat

  • Mutations in the DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A cause an overgrowth syndrome with intellectual disability.

    Katrina Tatton-Brown;Sheila Seal;Elise Ruark;Jenny Harmer

  • The effect of early, comprehensive genomic testing on clinical care in neonatal diabetes: an international cohort study

    Elisa De Franco;Sarah E Flanagan;Jayne A L Houghton;Hana Lango Allen

  • NSD1 Mutations Are the Major Cause of Sotos Syndrome and Occur in Some Cases of Weaver Syndrome but Are Rare in Other Overgrowth Phenotypes

    Jenny Douglas;Sandra Hanks;I. Karen Temple;Sally Davies

  • 3D analysis of facial morphology

    Peter Hammond;Tim J. Hutton;Judith E. Allanson;Linda E. Campbell

  • Histone Lysine Methylases and Demethylases in the Landscape of Human Developmental Disorders

    Víctor Faundes;Víctor Faundes;William G. Newman;Laura Bernardini;Natalie Canham

  • Mutations in the pre-replication complex cause Meier-Gorlin syndrome

    Louise S Bicknell;Ernie M H F Bongers;Andrea Leitch;Stephen Brown

  • 100,000 Genomes Pilot on Rare-Disease Diagnosis in Health Care - Preliminary Report.

    Damian Smedley;Katherine R. Smith;Antonio Martin

  • An imprinted locus associated with transient neonatal diabetes mellitus

    Rebecca J. Gardner;Deborah J.G. Mackay;Andrew J. Mungall;Constantin Polychronakos

  • Hypomethylation at multiple maternally methylated imprinted regions including PLAGL1 and GNAS loci in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome

    Jet Bliek;Gaetano Verde;Jonathan Callaway;Jonathan Callaway;Saskia M Maas

  • Coffin–Siris Syndrome and the BAF Complex: Genotype–Phenotype Study in 63 Patients

    Gijs W E Santen;Emmelien Aten;Anneke T. Vulto-van Silfhout;Caroline Pottinger

  • Temple syndrome: improving the recognition of an underdiagnosed chromosome 14 imprinting disorder: an analysis of 51 published cases

    Yiannis Ioannides;Kemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Kemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Deborah J G Mackay;Deborah J G Mackay;Justin H Davies;Justin H Davies

  • Relapsing diabetes can result from moderately activating mutations in KCNJ11.

    Anna L. Gloyn;Frank Reimann;Christophe Girard;Emma L. Edghill

  • Discriminating power of localized three-dimensional facial morphology

    Peter Hammond;Tim J. Hutton;Judith E. Allanson;Bernard Buxton

Frequent Co-Authors

Deborah J.G. Mackay
Deborah J.G. Mackay University of Southampton
Jill Clayton-Smith
Jill Clayton-Smith University of Manchester
Nazneen Rahman
Nazneen Rahman Institute of Cancer Research
Sian Ellard
Sian Ellard University of Exeter
Diana Baralle
Diana Baralle University of Southampton
Frances Flinter
Frances Flinter Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Bronwyn Kerr
Bronwyn Kerr University of Manchester
Michael A. Patton
Michael A. Patton St George's, University of London
John A. Crolla
John A. Crolla Salisbury District Hospital
Thomas Eggermann
Thomas Eggermann RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, there are several online healthcare degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Many students start with roles that complement genetic research or healthcare delivery, such as working in administration, coding, or direct patient care.

For those interested in the technical side of healthcare records, medical billing and coding certification cost is a popular search. These programs are often affordable and can lead to in-demand jobs supporting hospitals and clinics.

If you prefer direct patient care, you might research what nursing programs are easy to get into, making a nursing degree more accessible for those just starting out. A nursing background can open additional avenues in genetics, such as genetic counseling or research assistance.

For students drawn to leadership or operations, healthcare administration degrees are available online. Many choose these routes for their flexibility and strong job outlook. If cost is a major concern, check out the online healthcare administration degree options to help minimize expenses while expanding your career potential.

Best Scientists Citing I. Karen Temple

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles