World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
11753
World Ranking
13411
National Ranking
758

David W. Roberts publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 215 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

David W. Roberts D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Roberts sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Roberts is affiliated with Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom. Their scholarly work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Dermatology. This subfield includes significant research related to skin-related conditions and exposures.

Their publication record shows contributions to specialized areas including Organic Chemistry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Small Animals, and Plant Science. These subfields complement the main focus of their research, reflecting a broad interdisciplinary approach.

Roberts's research topics concentrate on areas such as Contact Dermatitis and Allergies, Occupational Exposure and Asthma, Animal Testing and Alternatives, and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity. Other key subjects include Effects and Risks of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Agricultural Safety and Regulations, and Dermatology and Skin Diseases.

Frequent publication venues for Roberts include Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Chemical Research in Toxicology, Critical Reviews in Toxicology, Toxicology Letters, and Computational Toxicology. These venues indicate a consistent engagement with toxicological and pharmacological aspects of dermatology and environmental health.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Roberts include:

  • Skin sensitization in silico protocol (2020) in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Evaluating confidence in toxicity assessments based on experimental data and in silico predictions (2021) in Computational Toxicology
  • Updating the Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds using an expanded dataset and an in silico expert system (2022) in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Application of the dermal sensitization threshold concept to chemicals classified as high potency category for skin sensitization assessment of ingredients for consumer products (2020) in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Chemistry of Isoeugenol and Its Oxidation Products: Mechanism and Kinetics of Isoeugenol as a Skin Sensitizer (2023) in Chemical Research in Toxicology

Collaboration appears as an important component of their work, with frequent co-authors including Martyn L. Chilton, A.M. Api, Candice Johnson, Lennart T. Anger, and Romualdo Benigni. These partnerships reflect a network of researchers focused on toxicology, dermatology, and related disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization.

    David W. Roberts;Grace Patlewicz;Petra S. Kern;Frank Gerberick

  • Comparison of Cramer classification between Toxtree, the OECD QSAR Toolbox and expert judgment.

    Sneha Bhatia;Terry Schultz;David Roberts;Jie Shen

  • Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive

    Robert J. Safford;Anne Marie Api;David W. Roberts;Jon F. Lalko

  • Principles for identification of High Potency Category Chemicals for which the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach should not be applied.

    David W. Roberts;Anne Marie Api;Robert J. Safford;Jon F. Lalko

  • Mechanistic Applicability Domains for Nonanimal-Based Prediction of Toxicological End Points: General Principles and Application to Reactive Toxicity

    and Aynur O. Aptula;David W. Roberts

  • Measurement and estimation of electrophilic reactivity for predictive toxicology.

    Johannes A H Schwöbel;Yana K Koleva;Steven J Enoch;Fania Bajot

  • Skin sensitization : Reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships

    Aynur O Aptula;Grace Patlewicz;David W Roberts

  • Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay.

    David W. Roberts;and Aynur O. Aptula;Grace Patlewicz

  • High Throughput Kinetic Profiling Approach for Covalent Binding to Peptides: Application to Skin Sensitization Potency of Michael Acceptor Electrophiles

    David W. Roberts;Andreas Natsch

  • Determinants of skin sensitisation potential.

    David W. Roberts;Aynur O. Aptula

  • A conceptual framework for predicting the toxicity of reactive chemicals: modeling soft electrophilicity.

    T W Schultz;R E Carlson;M T D Cronin;J L M Hermens

  • Mechanistic Applicability Domains for Non-Animal Based Prediction of Toxicological Endpoints. QSAR Analysis of the Schiff Base Applicability Domain for Skin Sensitization

    David W. Roberts;and Aynur O. Aptula;Grace Patlewicz

  • Towards AOP application – Implementation of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) into a pipeline tool for skin sensitization

    Grace Patlewicz;Chanita Kuseva;Antonia Kesova;Ioanna Popova

  • TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.

    Grace Patlewicz;Sabcho D. Dimitrov;Lawrence K. Low;Petra S. Kern

  • In silico prediction of aqueous solubility: the solubility challenge.

    Mark Hewitt;Mark T. D. Cronin;Steven J. Enoch;Judith C. Madden

  • Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization

    Aynur O. Aptula;Grace Patlewicz;David W. Roberts;T.W. Schultz

  • Structure-toxicity relationships for the effects to Tetrahymena pyriformis of aliphatic, carbonyl-containing, alpha,beta-unsaturated chemicals.

    T. Wayne Schultz;Tatiana I. Netzeva;David W. Roberts;Mark T. D. Cronin

  • Skin-sensitization structure-activity relationships for aldehydes.

    Grace Patlewicz;David A. Basketter;Camilla K. Smith;Sharon A. M. Hotchkiss

  • Contact and photocontact allergy to octocrylene: a review

    Anton C. de Groot;David W. Roberts

  • Activation of non‐sensitizing or low‐sensitizing fragrance substances into potent sensitizers – prehaptens and prohaptens

    Ann-Therese Karlberg;Anna Börje;Jeanne Duus Johansen;Carola Lidén

  • An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential

    G. Patlewicz;A. O. Aptula;E. Uriarte;D. W. Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark T. D. Cronin
Mark T. D. Cronin Liverpool John Moores University
David A. Basketter
David A. Basketter University of Bedfordshire
Jeffrey Penfold
Jeffrey Penfold Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
John C. Dearden
John C. Dearden Liverpool John Moores University
Ian Kimber
Ian Kimber University of Manchester
Eugenio Uriarte
Eugenio Uriarte University of Santiago de Compostela
Zifeng Yan
Zifeng Yan China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Ian R. White
Ian R. White University College London
Raymond R. Tice
Raymond R. Tice National Institutes of Health
Cindy A. Ryan
Cindy A. Ryan Procter & Gamble (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to several rewarding career paths that often require specialized education and training. For those interested in healthcare and pharmaceuticals, becoming a pharmacist is a popular option. Understanding the steps to become a pharmacist can help students plan their academic journey effectively.

Alternatively, graduates may consider roles in pharmaceutical sales, where a strong scientific background is valuable. Learning about the pharmaceutical sales rep salary and career paths can clarify the financial and professional benefits of this field.

Forensic chemistry is another dynamic avenue, often linked to criminal investigations. Pursuing an affordable online forensic science bachelor degree online can provide the necessary credentials to enter this specialized area.

Students interested in medical examiner offices might explore the role of an autopsy technician. Exploring the educational requirements, salary expectations, and job outlook for an autopsy technician can highlight practical considerations for this unique career path.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles