World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
38954
World Ranking
6492
National Ranking
3022

Raymond R. Tice publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond R. Tice sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 182 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Raymond R. Tice D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond R. Tice sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond R. Tice is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily intersects computer science and toxicology, with a particular focus on computational approaches to chemical safety assessment.

The scientist has contributed to studies in several main fields of study, including:

  • Computer Science

Within these fields, their work spans multiple subfields such as:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Small Animals
  • Cancer Research
  • Dermatology

Raymond R. Tice's research topics cover areas like:

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Contact Dermatitis and Allergies

Some recent papers published by this scientist include:

  • The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology, 2020, Chemical Research in Toxicology
  • Skin sensitization in silico protocol, 2020, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • In silico approaches in carcinogenicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs, 2021, Computational Toxicology
  • Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches, 2022, Computational Toxicology
  • Evaluating confidence in toxicity assessments based on experimental data and in silico predictions, 2021, Computational Toxicology

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Computational Toxicology
  • Chemical Research in Toxicology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Frontiers in Toxicology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Kevin P. Cross
  • Glenn J. Myatt
  • Ruili Huang
  • Kevin M. Crofton
  • David Woolley

Best Publications

  • A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells

    Narendra P. Singh;Michael T. McCoy;Raymond R. Tice;Edward L. Schneider

  • Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing.

    R. R. Tice;E. Agurell;D. Anderson;B. Burlinson

  • Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay

    A. Hartmann;E. Agurell;C. Beevers;S. Brendler-Schwaab

  • IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans

    Richard J Albertini;Diana Anderson;George R Douglas;Lars Hagmar

  • Biomarkers of oxidative stress study II : are oxidation products of lipids, proteins, and DNA markers of CCl4 poisoning?

    M.B. Kadiiska;B.C. Gladen;D.D. Baird;D. Germolec

  • Improving the Human Hazard Characterization of Chemicals: A Tox21 Update

    Raymond R. Tice;Christopher P. Austin;Robert J. Kavlock;John R. Bucher

  • Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

    Brian Burlinson;Raymond R. Tice;Günter Speit;Eva Agurell

  • Sister-chromatid exchanges: a report of the GENE-TOX program.

    Samuel A. Latt;James Allen;Stephen E. Bloom;Anthony Carrano

  • How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.

    David Kirkland;Stefan Pfuhler;David Tweats;Marilyn Aardema

  • Guidelines for the conduct of micronucleus assays in mammalian bone marrow erythrocytes.

    James T. MacGregor;John A. Heddle;Mark Hite;Barry H. Margolin

  • ReviewSister-chromatid exchange: second report of the Gene-Tox program

    James D. Tucker;Angela Auletta;Michael C. Cimino;Kerry L. Dearfield

  • In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay.

    Makoto Hayashi;Raymond R. Tice;James T. MacGregor;Diana Anderson

  • Abundant alkali-sensitive sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm☆

    Narendra P. Singh;David B. Danner;Raymond R. Tice;Michael T. McCoy

  • Compound cytotoxicity profiling using quantitative high-throughput screening.

    Menghang Xia;Ruili Huang;Kristine L. Witt;Noel Southall

  • 5-hmC in the brain is abundant in synaptic genes and shows differences at the exon-intron boundary.

    Tarang Khare;Shraddha Pai;Karolis Koncevicius;Karolis Koncevicius;Mrinal Pal

  • Mitochondria, energetics, epigenetics, and cellular responses to stress.

    Daniel T. Shaughnessy;Kimberly McAllister;Leroy Worth;Astrid C. Haugen

  • The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals--from vision to reality.

    Matias S. Attene-Ramos;Nicole Miller;Ruili Huang;Sam Michael

  • Comparative cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow damage induced in male B6C3F1 mice by multiple exposures to gaseous 1,3-butadiene.

    Raymond R. Tice;Raymond Boucher;Carol A. Luke;Michael D. Shelby

  • Chemical genomics profiling of environmental chemical modulation of human nuclear receptors.

    Ruili Huang;Menghang Xia;Ming-Hsuang Cho;Srilatha Sakamuru

  • Bisphenol A affects androgen receptor function via multiple mechanisms.

    Christina Teng;Bonnie Goodwin;Keith Shockley;Menghang Xia

Frequent Co-Authors

Menghang Xia
Menghang Xia National Institutes of Health
Ruili Huang
Ruili Huang National Institutes of Health
Christopher P. Austin
Christopher P. Austin National Institutes of Health
Edward L. Schneider
Edward L. Schneider University of Southern California
Anton Simeonov
Anton Simeonov National Institutes of Health
Richard S. Paules
Richard S. Paules National Institutes of Health
Ivan Rusyn
Ivan Rusyn Texas A&M University
Raymond W. Tennant
Raymond W. Tennant National Institutes of Health
Thomas Hartung
Thomas Hartung Johns Hopkins University
Fred A. Wright
Fred A. Wright North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Raymond R. Tice

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles