World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
65
Citations
18866
World Ranking
9024
National Ranking
4011

Richard S. Paules publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Paules sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard S. Paules D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard S. Paules sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard S. Paules is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and works primarily in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research encompasses various subfields including molecular biology, cancer research, computational theory and mathematics, environmental chemistry, and physiology.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics centered around DNA repair mechanisms, computational drug discovery methods, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, molecular biology techniques and applications, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, animal testing and alternatives, and chemistry and chemical engineering.

Richard S. Paules has contributed to numerous research papers published in a range of scientific venues. Selected recent publications include:

  • The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology (2020, Chemical Research in Toxicology)
  • Evaluation of 5-day In Vivo Rat Liver and Kidney With High-throughput Transcriptomics for Estimating Benchmark Doses of Apical Outcomes (2020, Toxicological Sciences)
  • Comparison of Normalization Methods for Analysis of TempO-Seq Targeted RNA Sequencing Data (2020, Frontiers in Genetics)
  • Mapping Interindividual Variability of Toxicodynamics Using High-Throughput Transcriptomics and Primary Human Hepatocytes from Fifty Donors (2024, Environmental Health Perspectives)
  • KRAS-retroviral fusion transcripts and gene amplification in arsenic-transformed, human prostate CAsE-PE cancer cells (2020, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology)

Their frequent co-authors include William K. Kaufmann, Dennis A. Simpson, Scott S. Auerbach, Ruchir Shah, and Dhiral Phadke. Collaboration with these researchers points to interdisciplinary work across molecular biology and toxicological sciences.

Richard S. Paules's publications appear in venues such as UNC Libraries, Chemical Research in Toxicology, Toxicological Sciences, Frontiers in Genetics, and Environmental Health Perspectives, reflecting a wide dissemination of their research findings.

Best Publications

  • An Integrated Stress Response Regulates Amino Acid Metabolism and Resistance to Oxidative Stress

    Heather P. Harding;Yuhong Zhang;Huiquing Zeng;Isabel Novoa

  • Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models

    Russell D. Wolfinger;Greg Gibson;Elizabeth D. Wolfinger;Lee Bennett

  • The Microarray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models

    Leming Shi;Gregory Campbell;Wendell D. Jones;Fabien Campagne

  • Oxidative stress and cell cycle checkpoint function

    Rodney E. Shackelford;William K. Kaufmann;Richard S. Paules

  • Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms

    Theodore Bammler;Richard P. Beyer;Sanchita Bhattacharya;Gary A. Boorman

  • The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance

    Charles Wang;Binsheng Gong;Pierre R. Bushel;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles.

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Pierre R. Bushel;Supriya Jayadev;Karla Martin

  • DNA damage and cell cycle checkpoints.

    William K. Kaufmann;Richard S. Paules

  • Cell cycle control, checkpoint mechanisms, and genotoxic stress.

    Rodney E. Shackelford;William K. Kaufmann;Richard S. Paules

  • Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Pierre R. Bushel;Supriya Jayadev;Olimpia DiSorbo

  • An ATR- and Chk1-Dependent S Checkpoint Inhibits Replicon Initiation following UVC-Induced DNA Damage

    Timothy P. Heffernan;Dennis A. Simpson;Alexandra R. Frank;Alexandra N. Heinloth

  • Gene expression profiling of rat livers reveals indicators of potential adverse effects.

    Alexandra N. Heinloth;Richard D. Irwin;Gary A. Boorman;Paul Nettesheim

  • The human decatenation checkpoint.

    Paula B. Deming;Cheryl A. Cistulli;Hui Zhao;Paul R. Graves

  • Human AlkB Homolog ABH8 Is a tRNA Methyltransferase Required for Wobble Uridine Modification and DNA Damage Survival

    Dragony Fu;Jennifer A. N. Brophy;Clement T. Y. Chan;Kyle A. Atmore

  • Mouse Mos protooncogene product is present and functions during oogenesis.

    R S Paules;R Buccione;R C Moschel;G F Vande Woude

  • Systems toxicology and the Chemical Effects in Biological Systems (CEBS) knowledge base.

    Michael Waters;Gary Boorman;Pierre Bushel;Michael Cunningham

  • Defective G2 Checkpoint Function in Cells from Individuals with Familial Cancer Syndromes

    Richard S. Paules;Eleni N. Levedakou;Sandra J. Wilson;Cynthia L. Innes

  • The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology.

    Ann M Richard;Ruili Huang;Suramya Waidyanatha;Paul Shinn

  • An overview of toxicogenomics.

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Rupesh P. Amin;Richard S. Paules;Cynthia A. Afshari

  • Human AlkB Homolog ABH8 Is a tRNA Methyltransferase Required for Wobble Uridine Modification and DNA Damage Survival

    Dragony Fu;Jennifer Ann Brophy;Tsz Yan Clement Chan;Kyle Aaquil Atmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre R. Bushel
Pierre R. Bushel National Institutes of Health
William K. Kaufmann
William K. Kaufmann AsystBio (United States)
Cynthia A. Afshari
Cynthia A. Afshari Janssen (United States)
Raymond W. Tennant
Raymond W. Tennant National Institutes of Health
Weida Tong
Weida Tong National Center for Toxicological Research
Hong Fang
Hong Fang National Center for Toxicological Research
Leming Shi
Leming Shi Fudan University
Yuri Nikolsky
Yuri Nikolsky F1 Genomics
Raymond R. Tice
Raymond R. Tice National Institutes of Health
Anton Simeonov
Anton Simeonov National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens many doors for online learning and career advancement. Flexible study options allow you to fast-track your studies or pivot into related healthcare sectors without needing to put your career on hold.

For those interested in a direct path to healthcare, bridging from a medical assistant role is possible through medical assistant to lpn programs online. These flexible courses are ideal for professionals seeking career mobility within clinical settings.

If you’re aiming for a quicker entry into biological sciences, accelerated biology degree programs offer intensive learning, helping you graduate faster and launch your career sooner.

Those interested in nursing may pursue an asn program online, a practical option to earn credentials and gain hands-on experience. Alternatively, students focused on health and wellness can explore a nutritionist degree online, which blends science with lifestyle coaching.

Each pathway provides a specialized foundation in the life sciences, whether your goal is research, healthcare, or nutrition-focused careers.

Best Scientists Citing Richard S. Paules

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles