World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 67 2516 2389 1125 1056 192 18853

Maureen A. Sartor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maureen A. Sartor between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maureen A. Sartor published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 153 publications in 2023. 93 of the 446 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 153. Peak 153 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 153 publications 2024: 72 publications 2025: 21 publications
2001 2025

446 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maureen A. Sartor: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 2
2004 8
2005 5
2006 8
2007 8
2008 6
2009 11
2010 11
2011 10
2012 15
2013 12
2014 14
2015 10
2016 15
2017 5
2018 11
2019 10
2020 16
2021 14
2022 6
2023 153
2024 72
2025 21
Total 446
Download as CSV

Maureen A. Sartor publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen A. Sartor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–194 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 192 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164 192
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Maureen A. Sartor D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen A. Sartor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184 67
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Maureen A. Sartor is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine, with significant contributions in multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Genetics.

The scientist's research topics cover a diverse range of areas, including:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Maureen A. Sartor has contributed extensively to scientific literature, with recent papers that include:

  • "The role of the histone H3 variant CENPA in prostate cancer" (2020) published in Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "ATRX loss in glioma results in dysregulation of cell-cycle phase transition and ATM inhibitor radio-sensitization" (2022) published in Cell Reports
  • "Effect of concentration and duration of particulate matter exposure on the transcriptome and DNA methylome of bronchial epithelial cells" (2021) published in Current Zoology
  • "Novel role of ASH1L histone methyltransferase in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma" (2020) published in Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "Single-Cell Analysis of the Gene Expression Effects of Developmental Lead (Pb) Exposure on the Mouse Hippocampus" (2020) published in Toxicological Sciences

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Oral Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Current Zoology

Regular collaborators in Maureen A. Sartor's work encompass a group of researchers with whom they have co-authored multiple papers. These collaborators are:

  • Tingting Qin
  • Laura S. Rozek
  • Dana C. Dolinoy
  • Nisha J. D'Silva
  • Justin A. Colacino

Throughout their career, Maureen A. Sartor has engaged with interdisciplinary themes at the intersection of molecular biology, cancer research, and environmental health sciences. Their work addresses molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development and progression, the impacts of toxic substances on genetic and epigenetic regulation, and biomarker identification relevant to cancer immunotherapy and disease diagnosis.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

    Michael S. Lawrence;Carrie Sougnez;Lee Lichtenstein;Kristian Cibulskis

  • ER-stress-induced transcriptional regulation increases protein synthesis leading to cell death

    Jaeseok Han;Sung Hoon Back;Junguk Hur;Yu Hsuan Lin

  • MicroRNA-320 Is Involved in the Regulation of Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Targeting Heat-Shock Protein 20

    Xiao Ping Ren;Jinghai Wu;Xiaohong Wang;Maureen A. Sartor

  • Metscape 2 bioinformatics tool for the analysis and visualization of metabolomics and gene expression data

    Alla Karnovsky;Terry Weymouth;Tim Hull;V. Glenn Tarcea

  • Characterization of HPV and host genome interactions in primary head and neck cancers.

    Michael Parfenov;Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu;Nils Gehlenborg;Nils Gehlenborg;Samuel S. Freeman

  • annotatr: genomic regions in context.

    Raymond G Cavalcante;Maureen A Sartor

  • Machine learning approaches and databases for prediction of drug-target interaction: a survey paper.

    Maryam Bagherian;Elyas Sabeti;Kai Wang;Maureen A Sartor

  • Intensity-based hierarchical Bayes method improves testing for differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments

    Maureen A Sartor;Craig R Tomlinson;Scott C Wesselkamper;Siva Sivaganesan

  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Differences Between Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitively Normal Controls in Human Frontal Cortex

    Kelly M. Bakulski;Dana C. Dolinoy;Maureen A. Sartor;Henry L. Paulson

  • MethylSig: a whole genome DNA methylation analysis pipeline.

    Yongseok Park;Maria E. Figueroa;Laura S. Rozek;Maureen A. Sartor

  • IDH1-R132H acts as a tumor suppressor in glioma via epigenetic up-regulation of the DNA damage response.

    Felipe J. Núñez;Flor M. Mendez;Padma Kadiyala;Mahmoud S. Alghamri

  • LRpath: a logistic regression approach for identifying enriched biological groups in gene expression data.

    Maureen A. Sartor;George D. Leikauf;Mario Medvedovic

  • Progression of BRAF -induced thyroid cancer is associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition requiring concomitant MAP kinase and TGFβ signaling

    Jeffrey A Knauf;Maureen A Sartor;Maureen A Sartor;Mario Medvedovic;Emma Lundsmith

  • HPV Integration in HNSCC Correlates with Survival Outcomes, Immune Response Signatures, and Candidate Drivers

    Lada A. Koneva;Yanxiao Zhang;Shama Virani;Pelle B. Hall

  • Genome-wide methylation and expression differences in HPV(+) and HPV(-) squamous cell carcinoma cell lines are consistent with divergent mechanisms of carcinogenesis.

    Maureen A. Sartor;Dana C. Dolinoy;Tamara R. Jones;Justin A. Colacino

  • Conditional activation of RET/PTC3 and BRAFV600E in thyroid cells is associated with gene expression profiles that predict a preferential role of BRAF in extracellular matrix remodeling.

    Cleo Mesa;Mana Mirza;Norisato Mitsutake;Maureen Sartor

  • ConceptGen: a gene set enrichment and gene set relation mapping tool

    Maureen A. Sartor;Vasudeva Mahavisno;Venkateshwar G. Keshamouni;James D. Cavalcoli

  • The IRE1α/XBP1s Pathway Is Essential for the Glucose Response and Protection of β Cells

    Justin R. Hassler;Donalyn L. Scheuner;Shiyu Wang;Jaeseok Han

  • ChIP-Enrich: gene set enrichment testing for ChIP-seq data

    Ryan P. Welch;Chee Lee;Paul M. Imbriano;Snehal Patil

  • Melanocortin 1 receptor genotype: an important determinant of the damage response of melanocytes to ultraviolet radiation

    Ana Luisa Kadekaro;Sancy Leachman;Renny J. Kavanagh;Viki Swope

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura S. Rozek
Laura S. Rozek Georgetown University
Mario Medvedovic
Mario Medvedovic University of Cincinnati
Thomas E. Carey
Thomas E. Carey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregory T. Wolf
Gregory T. Wolf University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
George D. Leikauf
George D. Leikauf University of Pittsburgh
Gilbert S. Omenn
Gilbert S. Omenn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alvaro Puga
Alvaro Puga University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Jeremy M. G. Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Carol R. Bradford
Carol R. Bradford The Ohio State University
Maria E. Figueroa
Maria E. Figueroa University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding healthcare careers. For those interested in supporting health services, completing a medical billing and coding certification is a fast way to enter the workforce and play a crucial role in patient data management and insurance processing.

If hands-on patient care is more appealing, exploring the easiest nursing programs to get into can be a practical first step. Nursing programs combine scientific understanding with real-world application—making them a natural choice for genetics enthusiasts.

For those considering leadership or administrative roles, obtaining a degree in healthcare administration or an online health management degree can be excellent options. These degrees prepare graduates to oversee healthcare organizations, manage teams, and navigate the evolving regulations of modern medicine.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and flexibility, allowing you to tailor your educational journey and build a career that suits your interests in genetics and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen A. Sartor

Trending Scientists