World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
41
Citations
7594
World Ranking
1899
National Ranking
810

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7846
World Ranking
7590
National Ranking
3291

Endre Boros publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Endre Boros sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 272 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Endre Boros D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Endre Boros sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Endre Boros is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within computer science, with a focus on computational theory and mathematics. They have published extensively across various subfields including artificial intelligence, economics and econometrics, computer networks and communications, and management science and operations research.

Their research topics cover a diverse set of areas such as advanced graph theory research, complexity and algorithms in graphs, and several aspects of game theory including voting systems and applications. They have also worked on subjects related to artificial intelligence in games, computability and logic, AI algorithms, as well as auction theory and its applications.

Endre Boros has authored multiple papers published in respected venues, including:

  • "Envy-free Relaxations for Goods, Chores, and Mixed Items" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "On the Sprague-Grundy function of extensions of proper Nim" (2020, International Journal of Game Theory)
  • "Computing remoteness functions of Moore, Wythoff, and Euclid's games" (2024, International Journal of Game Theory)
  • "Envy-free relaxations for goods, chores, and mixed items" (2024, Theoretical Computer Science)
  • "Deterministic n-person shortest path and terminal games on symmetric digraphs have Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies" (2023, International Journal of Game Theory)

Boros collaborates frequently with several coauthors, notably:

  • Vladimir Gurvich
  • Kazuhisa Makino
  • Martin Milanič
  • Kristóf Bérczi
  • Jernej Vičič

The scientist has a consistent publication record in specific academic outlets, with many papers appearing in arXiv (Cornell University). Other common publication venues include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), the International Journal of Game Theory, Theoretical Computer Science, and the Journal of Graph Theory.

Best Publications

  • Pseudo-boolean optimization

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer

  • An implementation of logical analysis of data

    E. Boros;P.L. Hammer;T. Ibaraki;A. Kogan

  • Logical analysis of numerical data

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer;Toshihide Ibaraki;Alexander Kogan

  • Generating All Vertices of a Polyhedron Is Hard

    Leonid Khachiyan;Endre Boros;Konrad Borys;Khaled Elbassioni

  • Local search heuristics for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO)

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer;Gabriel Tavares

  • Closed form two-sided bounds for probabilities that at least r and exactly r out of n events occur

    Endre Boros;Andras Prekopa

  • Polynomial-time inference of all valid implications for Horn and related formulae

    E. Boros;Y. Crama;P. L. Hammer

  • On Short Paths Interdiction Problems: Total and Node-Wise Limited Interdiction

    Leonid Khachiyan;Endre Boros;Konrad Borys;Khaled Elbassioni

  • The max-cut problem and quadratic 0-1 optimization; polyhedral aspects, relaxations and bounds

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer

  • On the Complexity of Generating Maximal Frequent and Minimal Infrequent Sets

    Endre Boros;Vladimir Gurvich;Leonid Khachiyan;Kazuhisa Makino

  • Perfect graphs, kernels, and cores of cooperative games

    E. Boros;V. Gurvich

  • Recognition of q -Horn formulae in linear time

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer;Xiaorong Sun

  • A graph cut algorithm for higher-order Markov Random Fields

    Alexander Fix;Aritanan Gruber;Endre Boros;Ramin Zabih

  • The number of triangles covering the center of an n-set

    E. Boros;Z. Füredi

  • Error-free and best-fit extensions of partially defined Boolean functions

    Endre Boros;Toshihide Ibaraki;Kazuhisa Makino

  • Preprocessing of unconstrained quadratic binary optimization

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer;Gabriel Tavares

  • On the sharpness of a theorem of B Segre

    E Boros;T Szönyi

  • On the Complexity of Some Enumeration Problems for Matroids

    L. Khachiyan;E. Boros;K. Elbassioni;V. Gurvich

  • Polynomial-Time Recognition of 2-Monotonic Positive Boolean Functions Given by an Oracle

    Endre Boros;Peter L. Hammer;Toshihide Ibaraki;Kazuhiko Kawakami

  • Dual subimplicants of positive Boolean functions

    Endre Boros;Vladimir Gurvich;Vladimir Gurvich;Peter L. Hammer

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter L. Hammer
Peter L. Hammer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Yves Crama
Yves Crama University of Liège
Toshihide Ibaraki
Toshihide Ibaraki Kyoto College of Graduate Studies for Informatics
Alexander Kogan
Alexander Kogan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Zoltán Füredi
Zoltán Füredi University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Fred S. Roberts
Fred S. Roberts Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
András Prékopa
András Prékopa Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ramin Zabih
Ramin Zabih Cornell University
Ron Shamir
Ron Shamir Tel Aviv University
Benjamin Melamed
Benjamin Melamed Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can enhance career opportunities for those interested in Mathematics. For example, business professionals often consider programs like the easiest mba programs which provide foundational management skills with flexible online structures.

For individuals aiming to reach executive-level positions, pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration is a strategic choice. Those looking for budget-friendly options should explore the cheapest dba online programs, combining affordability with advanced business expertise.

Finance enthusiasts can benefit significantly by enrolling in specialized degrees as well. The cheapest masters in finance highlight accessible pathways for gaining strong quantitative and analytical skills applicable to numerous industries.

Additionally, those motivated to complete their education swiftly might consider the shortest mba program online options, which reduce time to graduation while maintaining curriculum quality. Combining mathematics with these complementary business-focused degrees can open diverse, lucrative career avenues.

Best Scientists Citing Endre Boros

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles