World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
13143
World Ranking
13716
National Ranking
5811

Pierre R. Bushel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre R. Bushel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 143 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Pierre R. Bushel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre R. Bushel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre R. Bushel is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in Medicine. Key subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's main topics of work cover areas such as Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Gene Expression and Cancer Classification, Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Genomics and Rare Diseases, BRCA Gene Mutations in Cancer, and Genetic Factors in Colorectal Cancer.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pierre R. Bushel include Jianying Li, Rebecca Kusko, Andreas Scherer, Binsheng Gong, and Todd Richmond. The scientist has commonly published in venues like Frontiers in Genetics, UNC Libraries, Nature Biotechnology, Genome Biology, and The FASEB Journal.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Pierre R. Bushel are:

  • "Comparison of Normalization Methods for Analysis of TempO-Seq Targeted RNA Sequencing Data," 2020, Frontiers in Genetics
  • "Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing," 2021, Nature Biotechnology
  • "A verified genomic reference sample for assessing performance of cancer panels detecting small variants of low allele frequency," 2021, Genome Biology
  • "Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions," 2021, Genome Biology

Best Publications

  • Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models

    Russell D. Wolfinger;Greg Gibson;Elizabeth D. Wolfinger;Lee Bennett

  • The Microarray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models

    Leming Shi;Gregory Campbell;Wendell D. Jones;Fabien Campagne

  • A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium

    Zhenqiang Su;Paweł P. Łabaj;Sheng Li;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms

    Theodore Bammler;Richard P. Beyer;Sanchita Bhattacharya;Gary A. Boorman

  • The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance

    Charles Wang;Binsheng Gong;Pierre R. Bushel;Jean Thierry-Mieg

  • Gene expression analysis reveals chemical-specific profiles.

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Pierre R. Bushel;Supriya Jayadev;Karla Martin

  • A comparison of batch effect removal methods for enhancement of prediction performance using MAQC-II microarray gene expression data

    J. Luo;M. Schumacher;A. Scherer;D. Sanoudou

  • Prediction of compound signature using high density gene expression profiling

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Pierre R. Bushel;Supriya Jayadev;Olimpia DiSorbo

  • STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF A GENE EXPRESSION MICROARRAY EXPERIMENT WITH REPLICATION

    M. Kathleen Kerr;Cynthia A. Afshari;Lee Bennett;Pierre Bushel

  • Systems toxicology and the Chemical Effects in Biological Systems (CEBS) knowledge base.

    Michael Waters;Gary Boorman;Pierre Bushel;Michael Cunningham

  • Development of gut microbiota in infants not exposed to medical interventions

    Merete EGGESBø;Merete EGGESBø;Birgitte Moen;Shyamal Peddada;Donna Baird

  • Tamoxifen functions as a molecular agonist inducing cell cycle-associated genes in breast cancer cells.

    Leslie C. Hodges;Jennifer D. Cook;Edward K. Lobenhofer;Leping Li

  • p53 and NF-κB Coregulate Proinflammatory Gene Responses in Human Macrophages

    Julie M. Lowe;Daniel Menendez;Pierre R. Bushel;Maria Shatz

  • Global transcriptome and deletome profiles of yeast exposed to transition metals.

    Yong Hwan Jin;Paul E. Dunlap;Sandra J. McBride;Hanan Al-Refai

  • Research Resource: Whole-Genome Estrogen Receptor α Binding in Mouse Uterine Tissue Revealed by ChIP-Seq

    Sylvia C. Hewitt;Leping Li;Sara A. Grimm;Yu Chen

  • The Evolution of Bioinformatics in Toxicology: Advancing Toxicogenomics

    Cynthia A. Afshari;Hisham K. Hamadeh;Pierre R. Bushel

  • Evaluating the analytical validity of circulating tumor DNA sequencing assays for precision oncology

    Ira W. Deveson;Binsheng Gong;Kevin Lai;Jennifer S. LoCoco

  • CEBS—Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data

    Michael D. Waters;Stanley Stasiewicz;B. Alex Merrick;Kenneth B. Tomer

  • Methapyrilene Toxicity: Anchorage of Pathologic Observations to Gene Expression Alterations

    Hisham K. Hamadeh;Brian L. Knight;Astrid C. Haugen;Stella Sieber

  • Database development in toxicogenomics: issues and efforts.

    William B Mattes;Syril D Pettit;Susanna-Assunta Sansone;Pierre R Bushel

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard S. Paules
Richard S. Paules National Institutes of Health
Cynthia A. Afshari
Cynthia A. Afshari Janssen (United States)
Weida Tong
Weida Tong National Center for Toxicological Research
Leming Shi
Leming Shi Fudan University
Hong Fang
Hong Fang National Center for Toxicological Research
William K. Kaufmann
William K. Kaufmann AsystBio (United States)
Huixiao Hong
Huixiao Hong United States Food and Drug Administration
Wenzhong Xiao
Wenzhong Xiao Harvard University
Raymond W. Tennant
Raymond W. Tennant National Institutes of Health
Yuri Nikolsky
Yuri Nikolsky F1 Genomics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in biology or biochemistry opens doors to many growing career paths in healthcare, research, and technology. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing a certified medical coder salary can be a rewarding option, offering stable pay and flexible work settings. While some wonder is medical coding a dying career, the field continues to adapt to new technology and remains essential for healthcare operations.

Many choose the bachelor's degree health information management route for leadership roles in medical records and informatics. This pathway provides expertise in managing sensitive health data with modern digital systems.

For those drawn to health and wellness, a nutrition masters online can lead to exciting opportunities in clinical, community, or corporate settings.

With flexible, affordable online programs, biology and biochemistry students can broaden their skills and discover multiple career pathways in the healthcare sector and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre R. Bushel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles