World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
91136
World Ranking
8386
National Ranking
4336

Daniel A. Bloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 220 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel A. Bloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel A. Bloch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel A. Bloch is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. The scope of their academic profile includes various aspects of scientific research, though specific details about their research fields, recent papers, or publication venues are not available from the current data.

There is no record of recent papers or co-authors associated with Daniel A. Bloch that can provide insight into their recent collaborative work or areas of study. Likewise, there is no information about frequent publication venues or book publications that might help delineate their academic influence or editorial activity.

Details about Daniel A. Bloch's main and subfields of study are not provided. This absence limits the ability to outline their specific scientific interests or research focus within broader disciplinary categories.

Their profile also does not include documentation of awards or recognitions that would indicate acknowledgement from academic or professional bodies. Furthermore, the scientist is alive according to the dataset.

Best Publications

  • The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

    Frank C. Arnett;Steven M. Edworthy;Daniel A. Bloch;Dennis J. Mcshane

  • Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee

    R. Altman;E. Asch;D. Bloch;G. Bole

  • Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

    C. Bombardier;D. D. Gladman;M. B. Urowitz;D. Caron

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis

    Gene G. Hunder;Gene G. Hunder;Daniel A. Bloch;Daniel A. Bloch;Beat A. Michel;Mary Betty Stevens;Mary Betty Stevens

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis.

    William P. Arend;Beat A. Michel;Daniel A. Bloch;Gene G. Hunder

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of churg‐strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and angiitis)

    Alfonse T. Masi;Alfonse T. Masi;Gene G. Hunder;Gene G. Hunder;J. T. Lie;J. T. Lie;Beat A. Michel

  • The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip.

    R. Altman;G. Alarcón;D. Appelrouth;D. Bloch

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Wegener's granulomatosis.

    Randi Y. Leavitt;Randi Y. Leavitt;Anthony S. Fauci;Anthony S. Fauci;Daniel A. Bloch;Daniel A. Bloch;Beat A. Michel

  • Incidence of Parkinson’s Disease: Variation by Age, Gender, and Race/Ethnicity

    Stephen K. Van Den Eeden;Caroline M. Tanner;Allan L. Bernstein;Robin D. Fross

  • The mortality of rheumatoid arthritis

    Frederick Wolfe;Donald M. Mitchell;John T. Sibley;James F. Fries

  • A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression

    F. Y. Hsieh;Daniel A. Bloch;Michael D. Larsen

  • The American college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of polyarteritis nodosa

    Robert W. Lightfoot;Robert W. Lightfoot;Beat A. Michel;Daniel A. Bloch;Daniel A. Bloch;Gene G. Hunder;Gene G. Hunder

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of henoch‐schönlein purpura

    J A Mills;B A Michel;D A Bloch;L H Calabrese;L H Calabrese

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis. Introduction.

    Gene G. Hunder;William P. Arend;William P. Arend;Daniel A. Bloch;Leonard H. Calabrese;Leonard H. Calabrese

  • Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathways, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia, and the Atrioventricular Junction Final Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial

    Hugh Calkins;Patrick Yong;John M. Miller;Brian Olshansky

  • The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of vasculitis: Summary

    James F. Fries;James F. Fries;Gene G. Hunder;Gene G. Hunder;Daniel A. Bloch;Daniel A. Bloch;Beat A. Michel

  • Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis : Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritic Research Society

    Roy Altman;Kenneth Brandt;Marc Hochberg;Roland Moskowitz

  • Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

    Marie-Josée Berthiaume;Jean-Pierre Raynauld;Johanne Martel-Pelletier;Françoys Labonté

  • Capturing the Patient's View of Change as a Clinical Outcome Measure

    David Fischer;Anita L. Stewart;Daniel A. Bloch;Kate Lorig

  • Survival, prognosis, and causes of death in rheumatoid arthritis

    Donald M. Mitchell;Donald M. Mitchell;Patricia W. Spitz;Patricia W. Spitz;Donald Y. Young;Donald Y. Young;Daniel A. Bloch;Daniel A. Bloch

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Fries
James F. Fries Stanford University
Gene G. Hunder
Gene G. Hunder Mayo Clinic
Leonard H. Calabrese
Leonard H. Calabrese Cleveland Clinic
Alfonse T. Masi
Alfonse T. Masi University of Illinois at Chicago
William P. Arend
William P. Arend University of Colorado Denver
Nathan J. Zvaifler
Nathan J. Zvaifler University of California, San Diego
Randi Y. Leavitt
Randi Y. Leavitt MSD (United States)
Anthony S. Fauci
Anthony S. Fauci Georgetown University
Marc C. Hochberg
Marc C. Hochberg University of Maryland, Baltimore
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to numerous related degrees and diverse career paths. Many students consider flexible online options to complement or fast-track their journey into healthcare professions.

If you’re seeking a practical nursing career, a 6 month lpn program can provide accelerated entry into the workforce. For those interested in advanced practice roles, there are specialized psychiatric care tracks, including psychiatric np programs available online, which prepare graduates for in-demand mental health positions.

Healthcare isn’t limited to clinical roles. Students interested in the management side of health services often pursue a bachelors in health administration. For further advancement, completing the cheapest online mha provides a graduate-level credential in healthcare administration, often leading to leadership opportunities.

These online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and focused specializations—making them attractive options for those mapping a career in healthcare alongside or instead of a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel A. Bloch

Trending Scientists