World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
34681
World Ranking
11652
National Ranking
5976

Peter Mundel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Mundel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 178 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Mundel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Mundel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Mundel is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. The main subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Nephrology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work addresses several topics, primarily focused on renal health and cellular biology. The main research topics covered are:

  • Renal and related cancers
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Peter Mundel has contributed to a number of published papers, with research published in several notable venues. Selected papers include:

  • "Transplanted organoids empower human preclinical assessment of drug candidate for the clinic," 2022, Science Advances
  • "SO038A TRANSLATIONAL KIDNEY ORGANOID SYSTEM BOLSTERS HUMAN RELEVANCE OF CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT CANDIDATE," 2020, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • "The Kidney Genome Atlas: A Resource to Understand APOL1 and Other Genetic Drivers of Adult Proteinuric Kidney Diseases," 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Generation of Collecting Duct Kidney Organoids from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell," 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Scientific Business Abstracts," 2025, QJM

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Peter Mundel include:

  • Eva M. Fast
  • Amy Westerling-Bui
  • Thomas W. Soare
  • Alyssa Fanelli
  • Sergii Kyrychenko

Regarding publication venues, Peter Mundel's work has appeared multiple times in:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Science Advances
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • QJM

Best Publications

  • FGF23 induces left ventricular hypertrophy

    Christian Faul;Ansel P. Amaral;Behzad Oskouei;Ming Chang Hu

  • A Conditionally Immortalized Human Podocyte Cell Line Demonstrating Nephrin and Podocin Expression

    Moin A Saleem;Michael J O'Hare;Jochen Reiser;Richard J Coward

  • The actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes is a direct target of the antiproteinuric effect of cyclosporine A

    Christian Faul;Mary Donnelly;Mary Donnelly;Sandra Merscher-Gomez;Sandra Merscher-Gomez;Yoon Hee Chang;Yoon Hee Chang

  • Rearrangements of the cytoskeleton and cell contacts induce process formation during differentiation of conditionally immortalized mouse podocyte cell lines

    Peter Mundel;Jochen Reiser;Aimée Zúñiga Mejı́a Borja;Hermann Pavenstädt

  • TRPC6 is a glomerular slit diaphragm-associated channel required for normal renal function.

    Jochen Reiser;Krishna R Polu;Clemens C Möller;Peter Kenlan

  • Podocyte biology and response to injury.

    Peter Mundel;Stuart J. Shankland

  • Apoptosis in podocytes induced by TGF-β and Smad7

    Mario Schiffer;Markus Bitzer;Ian S.D. Roberts;Jeffrey B. Kopp

  • Podocin, a raft-associated component of the glomerular slit diaphragm, interacts with CD2AP and nephrin

    Karin Schwarz;Matias Simons;Jochen Reiser;Moin A. Saleem

  • The Dysregulated Podocyte Phenotype A Novel Concept in the Pathogenesis of Collapsing Idiopathic Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis and HIV-Associated Nephropathy

    Laura Barisoni;Wilhelm Kriz;Peter Mundel;Peter Mundel;Vivette D'agati

  • Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Bhaswati Pandit;Anna Sarkozy;Len A Pennacchio;Claudio Carta

  • Synaptopodin: An Actin-associated Protein in Telencephalic Dendrites and Renal Podocytes

    Peter Mundel;Hans W. Heid;Thomas M. Mundel;Meike Krüger

  • Induction of B7-1 in podocytes is associated with nephrotic syndrome

    Jochen Reiser;Jochen Reiser;Gero Von Gersdorff;Martin Loos;Jun Oh

  • Modification of kidney barrier function by the urokinase receptor

    Changli Wei;Clemens C. Möller;Mehmet M. Altintas;Jing Li

  • The Glomerular Slit Diaphragm Is a Modified Adherens Junction

    Jochen Reiser;Wilhelm Kriz;Matthias Kretzler;Peter Mundel

  • Cell Biology and Pathology of Podocytes

    Anna Greka;Peter Mundel

  • Synaptopodin orchestrates actin organization and cell motility via regulation of RhoA signalling

    Katsuhiko Asanuma;Etsuko Yanagida-Asanuma;Christian Faul;Yasuhiko Tomino

  • Topography of nitric oxide synthesis by localizing constitutive NO synthases in mammalian kidney

    S. Bachmann;H. M. Bosse;P. Mundel

  • Activation of a local tissue angiotensin system in podocytes by mechanical strain

    Raghu V. Durvasula;Arndt T. Petermann;Arndt T. Petermann;Keiju Hiromura;Keiju Hiromura;Mary Blonski;Mary Blonski

  • Podocyte-Selective Deletion of Dicer Induces Proteinuria and Glomerulosclerosis

    Shaolin Shi;Liping Yu;Celine Chiu;Yezhou Sun

  • Expression of nitric oxide synthase in kidney macula densa cells.

    Peter Mundel;Peter Mundel;Sebastian Bachmann;Sebastian Bachmann;Michael Bader;Michael Bader;Axel Fischer;Axel Fischer

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilhelm Kriz
Wilhelm Kriz Heidelberg University
Roland Nitschke
Roland Nitschke University of Freiburg
Hermann Pavenstädt
Hermann Pavenstädt University of Freiburg
Wolfgang Kummer
Wolfgang Kummer University of Giessen
Bernd Mayer
Bernd Mayer University of Graz
Per-Olof Berggren
Per-Olof Berggren Karolinska Institute
Tobias B. Huber
Tobias B. Huber Universität Hamburg
Moin A. Saleem
Moin A. Saleem University of Bristol
Erwin P. Bottinger
Erwin P. Bottinger Hasso Plattner Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers doesn't always require the traditional path of attending a full-time, on-campus program. Many students now choose online degrees that offer flexibility and affordability without compromising on quality. For example, registered nurses looking to advance their expertise can consider the best online bsn to dnp programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in nursing.

Beyond nursing, those interested in pharmacy can find reputable online pharmacy schools that deliver advanced training and open doors to various healthcare professions. For those drawn to the administrative and technology aspects of healthcare, pursuing an online mhi (Master of Health Information) degree is an in-demand option.

Additionally, if you want to enter healthcare quickly, medical billing and coding cost is comparatively low, and this career can often be started after completing a short online course. Each of these pathways can lead to rewarding roles supporting patient care and healthcare operations, even if you are not pursuing a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Mundel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles