World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
26805
World Ranking
18306
National Ranking
9135

Martin R. Pollak publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Pollak sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 241 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin R. Pollak D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Pollak sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin R. Pollak is affiliated with the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine, with a significant focus on nephrology, genetics, and molecular biology.

The primary fields of study for Martin R. Pollak include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader fields, research has concentrated on subfields such as:

  • Nephrology
  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

The main topics of their work cover various aspects of renal and related diseases:

  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

Martin R. Pollak has contributed to numerous scientific publications. Prominent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Kidney International
  • Kidney360

Frequent co-authors in their research efforts have been:

  • David J. Friedman
  • Rasheed Gbadegesin
  • Matthias Kretzler
  • Simone Sanna-Cherchi
  • Ali G. Gharavi

Recent papers reflecting their research interests include the following:

  • APOL1 Nephropathy: From Genetics to Clinical Applications, 2020, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Inaxaplin for Proteinuric Kidney Disease in Persons with Two APOL1 Variants, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Genetics in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2022, Kidney International
  • Kidney Disease-Associated APOL1 Variants Have Dose-Dependent, Dominant Toxic Gain-of-Function, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Aberrantly glycosylated IgG elicits pathogenic signaling in podocytes and signifies lupus nephritis, 2021, JCI Insight

Best Publications

  • Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans.

    Giulio Genovese;Giulio Genovese;David J. Friedman;Michael D. Ross;Laurence Lecordier

  • Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

    Joshua M. Kaplan;Sung Han Kim;Kathryn N. North;Helmut Rennke

  • TRPC6 is a glomerular slit diaphragm-associated channel required for normal renal function.

    Jochen Reiser;Krishna R Polu;Clemens C Möller;Peter Kenlan

  • Mutations in the human Ca2+-sensing receptor gene cause familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism

    Martin R. Pollak;Edward M. Brown;Yah-Huei Wu Chou;Steven C. Hebert

  • Stem cell engraftment at the endosteal niche is specified by the calcium-sensing receptor

    Gregor B. Adams;Karissa T. Chabner;Ian R. Alley;Douglas P. Olson

  • APOL1 Genetic Variants in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis and HIV-Associated Nephropathy

    Jeffrey B. Kopp;George W. Nelson;Karmini Sampath;Randall C. Johnson;Randall C. Johnson

  • A mouse model of human familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism

    Chrystal Ho;David A. Conner;Martin R. Pollak;Martin R. Pollak;Daniel J. Ladd;Daniel J. Ladd

  • Autosomal dominant hypocalcaemia caused by a Ca 2+ -sensing receptor gene mutation

    Martin R. Pollak;Edward M. Brown;Herschel L. Estep;Peter N. McLaine

  • Expression and Characterization of Inactivating and Activating Mutations in the Human Ca2+o-sensing Receptor

    Mei Bai;Steven Quinn;Sunita Trivedi;Olga Kifor

  • Mutations in the formin gene INF2 cause focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

    Elizabeth J Brown;Johannes S Schlöndorff;Johannes S Schlöndorff;Daniel J Becker;Daniel J Becker;Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi;Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi;Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi

  • Research capacity. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa

    Charles Rotimi;Akin Abayomi;Alash'le Abimiku;Victoria May Adabayeri

  • ADCK4 mutations promote steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome through CoQ10 biosynthesis disruption

    Shazia Ashraf;Heon Yung Gee;Stephanie Woerner;Stephanie Woerner;Letian X. Xie

  • Mice deficient in α-actinin-4 have severe glomerular disease

    Claudine H. Kos;Tu Cam Le;Sumita Sinha;Joel M. Henderson

  • Mutations causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1 lie in a large VNTR in MUC1 missed by massively parallel sequencing

    Andrew Kirby;Andreas Gnirke;David B Jaffe;Veronika Barešová

  • Calcium-Ion–Sensing Cell-Surface Receptors

    Edward M. Brown;Martin Pollak;Christine E. Seidman;J.G. Seidman

  • Innate immunity pathways regulate the nephropathy gene Apolipoprotein L1.

    Brendan Nichols;Prachi Jog;Jessica H. Lee;Daniel Blackler

  • NPHS2 mutations in late-onset focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: R229Q is a common disease-associated allele

    Hiroyasu Tsukaguchi;Akulapalli Sudhakar;Tu Cam Le;Trang Nguyen

  • The Extracellular Calcium-Sensing Receptor: Its Role in Health and Disease

    Edward M. Brown;Martin Pollak;Steven C. Hebert

  • Arhgap24 inactivates Rac1 in mouse podocytes, and a mutant form is associated with familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

    Shreeram Akilesh;Hani Suleiman;Haiyang Yu;M. Christine Stander

  • Association of Trypanolytic ApoL1 Variants with Kidney Disease in

    Giulio Genovese;David J. Friedman;Michael D. Ross

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward M. Brown
Edward M. Brown University of Rochester Medical Center
Seth L. Alper
Seth L. Alper Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Giulio Genovese
Giulio Genovese Broad Institute
Christine E. Seidman
Christine E. Seidman Harvard University
Steven C. Hebert
Steven C. Hebert Yale University
Jeffrey B. Kopp
Jeffrey B. Kopp National Institutes of Health
David B. Mount
David B. Mount Brigham and Women's Hospital
David Goltzman
David Goltzman McGill University
Friedhelm Hildebrandt
Friedhelm Hildebrandt Boston Children's Hospital
David A. Weitz
David A. Weitz Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always require following the traditional MD path. Many students begin their healthcare journeys through alternative online degrees and certifications. Programs such as medical billing and coding financial aid options make administrative healthcare roles accessible and affordable by offering scholarships and grants.

If you’re a nurse looking to advance, there are lpn to rn programs without teas test, eliminating common exam barriers and streamlining your progression. For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing a health administration degree online allows you to gain essential skills for management roles within hospitals and clinics, often at an accelerated pace.

Nurses seeking advanced practice roles can benefit from flexible adn to np programs online, making it easier to become a Nurse Practitioner while balancing work and study. Each of these pathways provides diverse entry points into the healthcare field—empowering students with opportunities that suit their backgrounds, ambitions, and learning preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Martin R. Pollak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles