World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4010
World Ranking
12287
National Ranking
428

Stefania Montani publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefania Montani sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 174 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stefania Montani D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefania Montani sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefania Montani is affiliated with the University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro in Italy. Their research spans several fields of study, primarily focusing on Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting. Within these broader areas, they have contributed notably to subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their research include Business Process Modeling and Analysis, Machine Learning in Healthcare, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, Data Quality and Management, Time Series Analysis and Forecasting, and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications.

Montani has published extensively, with a strong record across multiple venues. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Future Internet
  • The Italian Journal of Pediatrics
  • Progress in Artificial Intelligence

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Montani are:

  • "Explainable process trace classification: An application to stroke" (2021), published in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "Integrating ISA and Part-of Domain Knowledge into Process Model Discovery" (2022), published in Future Internet
  • "High-Fidelity simulation-based program improves flow state scale in the perinatal team" (2021), published in The Italian Journal of Pediatrics
  • "Structural positional encoding for knowledge integration in transformer-based medical process monitoring and trace classification" (2024), published in Progress in Artificial Intelligence
  • "NRTS: A Client-Server Architecture for Supporting Education in a Neonatal Resuscitation Simulation Scenario" (2023), published in Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Montani frequently collaborates with other researchers. Key co-authors include:

  • Manuel Striani
  • Giorgio Leonardi
  • Alessio Bottrighi
  • Marco Guazzone
  • Paolo Terenziani

The nature of their publications shows an interdisciplinary approach, combining technical developments in artificial intelligence and computer science with applications in healthcare and business process analysis. This is further reflected in their contributions to topics such as machine learning in healthcare and semantic web technologies.

Best Publications

  • Cased-Based Reasoning for medical knowledge-based systems

    Rainer Schmidt;Stefania Montani;Riccardo Bellazzi;Luigi Portinale

  • Radyban: A tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks

    S. Montani;L. Portinale;A. Bobbio;D. Codetta-Raiteri

  • A telemedicine support for diabetes management: the T-IDDM project.

    R Bellazzi;C Larizza;S Montani;A Riva

  • Web-based telemedicine systems for home-care: technical issues and experiences

    Riccardo Bellazzi;Stefania Montani;Alberto Riva;Mario Stefanelli

  • Towards a comprehensive treatment of repetitions, periodicity and temporal constraints in clinical guidelines

    Luca Anselma;Paolo Terenziani;Stefania Montani;Alessio Bottrighi

  • Intelligent analysis of clinical time series: an application in the diabetes mellitus domain

    R Bellazzi;C Larizza;P Magni;S Montani

  • Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: a Focused Literature Survey.

    Stefania Montani;Manuel Striani

  • Supporting decisions in medical applications: the knowledge management perspective.

    Stefania Montani;Riccardo Bellazzi

  • The GLARE approach to clinical guidelines: main features.

    Paolo Terenziani;Stefania Montani;Alessio Bottrighi;Mauro Torchio

  • Case-based retrieval to support the treatment of end stage renal failure patients

    Stefania Montani;Luigi Portinale;Giorgio Leonardi;Riccardo Bellazzi

  • Exploring new roles for case-based reasoning in heterogeneous AI systems for medical decision support

    Stefania Montani

  • Integrating model-based decision support in a multi-modal reasoning system for managing type 1 diabetic patients

    Stefania Montani;Paolo Magni;Riccardo Bellazzi;Cristiana Larizza

  • Supporting reliability engineers in exploiting the power of Dynamic Bayesian Networks

    Luigi Portinale;Daniele Codetta Raiteri;Stefania Montani

  • Editorial: Process-oriented case-based reasoning

    Mirjam Minor;Stefania Montani;Juan A. Recio-García

  • A dynamic Bayesian network based framework to evaluate cascading effects in a power grid

    Daniele Codetta-Raiteri;Andrea Bobbio;Stefania Montani;Luigi Portinale

  • Achieving self-healing in service delivery software systems by means of case-based reasoning

    Stefania Montani;Cosimo Anglano

  • Adopting model checking techniques for clinical guidelines verification

    Alessio Bottrighi;Laura Giordano;Gianpaolo Molino;Stefania Montani

  • Diabetic patients management exploiting case-based reasoning techniques.

    Stefania Montani;Riccardo Bellazzi;Luigi Portinale;Giuseppe d’Annunzio

  • Meta-analysis of the effect of the use of computer-based systems on the metabolic control of patients with diabetes mellitus.

    Stefania Montani;Riccardo Bellazzi;Silvana Quaglini;Giuseppe D'Annunzio

  • Protocol-based reasoning in diabetic patient management

    Stefania Montani;Riccardo Bellazzi;Cristiana Larizza;Alberto Riva

  • An intensional approach to qualitative and quantitative periodicity-dependent temporal constraints

    Luca Anselma;Stefania Montani;Paolo Terenziani

Frequent Co-Authors

Riccardo Bellazzi
Riccardo Bellazzi University of Pavia
Mario Stefanelli
Mario Stefanelli University of Pavia
Andrea Bobbio
Andrea Bobbio University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Luisa Lanfranco
Luisa Lanfranco University of Turin
Paola Mello
Paola Mello University of Bologna
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Claudio Cobelli
Claudio Cobelli University of Padua
Giuseppe De Nicolao
Giuseppe De Nicolao University of Pavia
Paola Bonfante
Paola Bonfante University of Turin
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and exciting interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students are exploring options beyond traditional tech roles. For example, some find that combining their technology skills with fields like education or sustainability can lead to unique roles, such as jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds.

Flexibility is a major advantage of today’s educational landscape. Those looking to jumpstart their tech career quickly can consider a computer science accelerated program, which allows you to earn your degree on a faster timeline—entirely online.

Related engineering fields are also available through affordable online options. For instance, those interested in the environment and sustainability might look into an environmental engineering degree online. Similarly, budget-minded students may seek out the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online to expand their skills while managing costs.

Whether you’re looking to specialize or diversify, online degree pathways make it easier than ever to shape a career that matches your passions and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Stefania Montani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles