World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11088 10774 353 351 274 7169

Paola Mello publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paola Mello between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paola Mello published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2008. 3 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2008. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1986 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paola Mello: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 3
1989 5
1990 5
1991 10
1992 10
1993 7
1994 3
1995 2
1996 10
1997 13
1998 4
1999 12
2000 6
2001 6
2002 4
2003 6
2004 16
2005 12
2006 15
2007 14
2008 21
2009 17
2010 15
2011 12
2012 9
2013 3
2014 3
2015 2
2016 4
2017 6
2018 8
2019 5
2020 3
2021 2
2022 4
2023 1
2024 1
2025 2
Total 284
Download as CSV

Paola Mello publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paola Mello sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 272–281 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 274 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335 274
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Paola Mello D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paola Mello sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paola Mello is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of computer science and business, management, and accounting, with a focused interest in artificial intelligence and management information systems.

The main areas of study for this scientist include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Paola Mello's research topics cover a range of subjects intertwined with business and technology. These include:

  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization

Recently published papers by Paola Mello include:

  • "Declarative and Mathematical Programming approaches to Decision Support Systems for food recycling," 2020, published in Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • "Process Discovery on Deviant Traces and Other Stranger Things," 2022, published in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • "A Prolog application for reasoning on maths puzzles with diagrams," 2022, published in Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
  • "Artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology: How to solve mathematical problems," 2020, published in Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)
  • "Process discovery on deviant traces and other stranger things," 2021, published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paola Mello are:

  • Federico Chesani
  • Daniela Loreti
  • Chiara Di Francescomarino
  • Chiara Ghidini
  • Fabrizio Maria Maggi

Paola Mello's publications appear across a variety of scholarly venues, including:

  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Image analysis and rule-based reasoning for a traffic monitoring system

    R. Cucchiara;M. Piccardi;P. Mello

  • Image analysis and rule-based reasoning for a traffic monitoring system

    R. Cucchiara;M. Piccardi;P. Mello

  • Declarative specification and verification of service choreographiess

    Marco Montali;Maja Pesic;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Federico Chesani

  • Verifiable agent interaction in abductive logic programming: The SCIFF framework

    Marco Alberti;Federico Chesani;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma

  • Modularity in Logic Programming

    Michele Bugliesi;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello

  • Monitoring business constraints with the event calculus

    Marco Montali;Fabrizio M. Maggi;Federico Chesani;Paola Mello

  • COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION OF AGENT INTERACTION: A LOGIC-BASED SOFTWARE TOOL

    Marco Alberti;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma;Federico Chesani

  • Exploiting Inductive Logic Programming Techniques for Declarative Process Mining

    Federico Chesani;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello;Marco Montali

  • Specification and verification of agent interaction protocols in a logic-based system

    Marco Alberti;Davide Daolio;Paolo Torroni;Marco Gavanelli

  • Representing and monitoring social commitments using the event calculus

    Federico Chesani;Paola Mello;Marco Montali;Paolo Torroni

  • HABITAT: An IoT Solution for Independent Elderly

    Elena Borelli;Giacomo Paolini;Francesco Antoniazzi;Marina Barbiroli

  • Expressing and Verifying Business Contracts with Abductive Logic Programming

    Marco Alberti;Federico Chesani;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma

  • Applying inductive logic programming to process mining

    Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello;Fabrizio Riguzzi;Sergio Storari

  • Inducing declarative logic-based models from labeled traces

    Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello;Marco Montali;Fabrizio Riguzzi

  • Integrating constraint logic programming and operations research techniques for the crew rostering problem

    A. Caprara;F. Focacci;E. Lamma;P. Mello

  • Constraint Propagation and Value Acquisition: Why we should do it Interactively

    Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello;Michela Milano;Rita Cucchiara

  • Commitment tracking via the reactive event calculus

    Federico Chesani;Paola Mello;Marco Montali;Paolo Torroni

  • Towards data-aware constraints in declare

    Marco Montali;Federico Chesani;Paola Mello;Fabrizio M. Maggi

  • Specification and Verification of Agent Interaction using Social Integrity Constraints

    Marco Alberti;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello

  • A Configurable Rete-OO Engine for Reasoning with Different Types of Imperfect Information

    Davide Sottara;Paola Mello;Mark Proctor

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Paolo Torroni
Paolo Torroni University of Bologna
Michela Milano
Michela Milano University of Bologna
Rita Cucchiara
Rita Cucchiara University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Antonio Brogi
Antonio Brogi University of Pisa
Massimo Piccardi
Massimo Piccardi University of Technology Sydney
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
Fabrizio Maria Maggi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Stefania Montani
Stefania Montani University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Alessandra Costanzo
Alessandra Costanzo University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the rise of remote learning, students can now access a wide range of programs in computer science and related fields through online education. For those just starting out, associates degrees online offer a flexible, affordable option to build foundational skills or launch a technical career.

Budget is often a key concern. Many cheap online colleges provide quality programs in computer science and other STEM areas, making education accessible without a heavy financial burden.

Academic history doesn’t have to be a barrier either. Students with lower GPAs can find opportunities at online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, helping them continue their education and take important steps toward a technical career.

Additionally, computer science intersects with other disciplines, creating diverse pathways. For instance, expertise in technology can complement degrees such as an environmental science degree, enabling graduates to address critical issues like sustainability and climate change through innovative tech solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Paola Mello

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles