World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4917
World Ranking
12185
National Ranking
415

Paolo Torroni publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Torroni sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paolo Torroni D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Torroni sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Torroni is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several specialized subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations, Safety Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Law.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches and applications. These topics include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Artificial Intelligence in Law
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Speech and dialogue systems

Paolo Torroni has authored multiple research papers in well-regarded venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Attention in Natural Language Processing" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • "The Force Awakens: Artificial Intelligence for Consumer Law" (2020), Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • "Detecting and explaining unfairness in consumer contracts through memory networks" (2021), Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • "Neural-Symbolic Argumentation Mining: An Argument in Favor of Deep Learning and Reasoning" (2024), Technischen Universität Darmstadt
  • "A privacy-preserving dialogue system based on argumentation" (2022), Intelligent Systems with Applications

Frequent publication venues for Paolo Torroni include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Intelligent Systems with Applications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Fundamenta Informaticae

Collaborative work features several frequent co-authors. These include:

  • Andrea Galassi
  • Marco Lippi
  • Federico Ruggeri
  • Francesca Lagioia
  • Giovanni Sartor

Best Publications

  • Attention in Natural Language Processing

    Andrea Galassi;Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • Argumentation Mining: State of the Art and Emerging Trends

    Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • CLAUDETTE: an automated detector of potentially unfair clauses in online terms of service

    Marco Lippi;Przemysław Pałka;Giuseppe Contissa;Giuseppe Contissa;Francesca Lagioia;Francesca Lagioia

  • Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies IV

    Matteo Baldoni;Ulle Endriss;Andrea Omicini;Paolo Torroni

  • Dialogues for negotiation: Agent varieties and dialogue sequences

    Fariba Sadri;Francesca Toni;Paolo Torroni

  • Verifiable agent interaction in abductive logic programming: The SCIFF framework

    Marco Alberti;Federico Chesani;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma

  • Context-independent claim detection for argument mining

    Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • Dialogues for Negotiation: Agent Varieties and Dialogue Sequences

    Fariba Sadri;Francesca Toni;Paolo Torroni

  • COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION OF AGENT INTERACTION: A LOGIC-BASED SOFTWARE TOOL

    Marco Alberti;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma;Federico Chesani

  • The Added Value of Argumentation

    Sanjay Modgil;Francesca Toni;Floris Bex;Ivan Bratko

  • Specification and verification of agent interaction protocols in a logic-based system

    Marco Alberti;Davide Daolio;Paolo Torroni;Marco Gavanelli

  • Representing and monitoring social commitments using the event calculus

    Federico Chesani;Paola Mello;Marco Montali;Paolo Torroni

  • MARGOT: A web server for argumentation mining

    Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • COMPUTATIONAL LOGICS AND AGENTS: A ROAD MAP OF CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES AND FUTURE TRENDS

    Michael Fisher;Rafael H. Bordini;Benjamin Hirsch;Paolo Torroni

  • Expressing and Verifying Business Contracts with Abductive Logic Programming

    Marco Alberti;Federico Chesani;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma

  • An Abductive Logic Programming Architecture for Negotiating Agents

    Fariba Sadri;Francesca Toni;Paolo Torroni

  • Argument mining from speech: detecting claims in political debates

    Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • Argument Mining: A Machine Learning Perspective

    Marco Lippi;Paolo Torroni

  • Commitment tracking via the reactive event calculus

    Federico Chesani;Paola Mello;Marco Montali;Paolo Torroni

  • Specification and Verification of Agent Interaction using Social Integrity Constraints

    Marco Alberti;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello

  • Mapping deontic operators to abductive expectations

    Marco Alberti;Marco Gavanelli;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello

  • Cooperation and Competition in ALIAS: A Logic Framework for Agents that Negotiate

    Anna Ciampolini;Evelina Lamma;Paola Mello;Francesca Toni

Frequent Co-Authors

Paola Mello
Paola Mello University of Bologna
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Giovanni Sartor
Giovanni Sartor University of Bologna
Francesca Toni
Francesca Toni Imperial College London
Mehdi Dastani
Mehdi Dastani Utrecht University
Andrea Omicini
Andrea Omicini University of Bologna
Michela Milano
Michela Milano University of Bologna
Serena Villata
Serena Villata French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Guido Boella
Guido Boella University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to computer science can open doors to a variety of promising career pathways. Specializing in fields like engineering, physics, or data science allows students to tailor their studies toward emerging industries and technology-driven roles.

For those interested in making a positive environmental impact, consider an environmental engineering online degree. This path blends technology with sustainability, preparing graduates for roles in green technology and public safety.

If innovation and design appeal to you, a cheapest mechanical engineering degree online can be a cost-effective way to enter industries such as robotics, automotive, or manufacturing.

Looking for a science-focused option? An online physics bachelor's degree helps develop analytical and problem-solving skills, highly valued in both academia and technology sectors.

Tech-savvy students interested in big data and analytics should review the cheapest data science degree options available online. This rapidly growing field offers abundant opportunities in business, healthcare, finance, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Torroni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles