World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
43787
World Ranking
7008
National Ranking
3682

Neuroscience

D-Index
104
Citations
43645
World Ranking
662
National Ranking
368

Edward F. Chang publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward F. Chang sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 422 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edward F. Chang D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward F. Chang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward F. Chang is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within neuroscience and medicine, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Additional areas of study include genetics and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neural dynamics and brain function, neurological disorders and treatments, and functional brain connectivity studies. Other notable topics include neuroscience and neural engineering, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and neuroscience and music perception.

Edward F. Chang has contributed extensively to the scientific literature, with notable publications in several key venues. The most frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neuro-Oncology, Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery, and Brain Stimulation.

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Edward F. Chang include:

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma, 2020, JAMA Oncology
  • Neuroprosthesis for Decoding Speech in a Paralyzed Person with Anarthria, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control, 2023, Nature
  • Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework, 2020, Nature Neuroscience

Throughout their career, Edward F. Chang has collaborated frequently with other researchers. Some of the most common co-authors include Mitchel S. Berger, Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper, Kristin K. Sellers, Ankit N. Khambhati, and Manish K. Aghi.

Best Publications

  • Purification and Characterization of Progenitor and Mature Human Astrocytes Reveals Transcriptional and Functional Differences with Mouse.

    Ye Zhang;Steven A. Sloan;Laura E. Clarke;Christine Caneda

  • New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS.

    Mariko L. Bennett;F. Chris Bennett;Shane A. Liddelow;Shane A. Liddelow;Bahareh Ajami

  • Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults

    Shawn F. Sorrells;Mercedes F. Paredes;Arantxa Cebrian-Silla;Kadellyn Sandoval

  • Role of Extent of Resection in the Long-Term Outcome of Low-Grade Hemispheric Gliomas

    Justin S. Smith;Edward F. Chang;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Susan M. Chang

  • Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception

    Nima Mesgarani;Edward F. Chang

  • Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus

    Nima Mesgarani;Connie Cheung;Keith Johnson;Edward F. Chang

  • An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability.

    Jennifer R. Molina;Yuting Sun;Marina Protopopova;Sonal Gera

  • Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences

    Gopala K. Anumanchipalli;Josh Chartier;Edward F. Chang

  • Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation

    Kristofer E. Bouchard;Nima Mesgarani;Keith Johnson;Edward F. Chang

  • Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus

    Edward F Chang;Jochem W Rieger;Jochem W Rieger;Keith Johnson;Mitchel S Berger

  • Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex

    Brian N. Pasley;Stephen V. David;Nima Mesgarani;Nima Mesgarani;Adeen Flinker

  • Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

    Annette M. Molinaro;Shawn Hervey-Jumper;Ramin A. Morshed;Jacob Young

  • Environmental Noise Retards Auditory Cortical Development

    Edward F. Chang;Michael M. Merzenich

  • Seizure characteristics and control following resection in 332 patients with low-grade gliomas

    Edward F. Chang;Matthew B. Potts;G. Evren Keles;Kathleen R. Lamborn

  • Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response

    Dario J Englot;Edward F Chang;Kurtis I Auguste

  • Multi-day rhythms modulate seizure risk in epilepsy

    Maxime Olivier Baud;Jonathan K. Kleen;Emily A. Mirro;Jason C. Andrechak

  • Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical perirolandic gliomas located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients.

    G Evren Keles;David A Lundin;Kathleen R Lamborn;Edward F Chang

  • Neuroprosthesis for Decoding Speech in a Paralyzed Person with Anarthria.

    David A Moses;Sean L Metzger;Jessie R Liu;Gopala K Anumanchipalli

  • Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression.

    Katherine W. Scangos;Katherine W. Scangos;Ankit N. Khambhati;Ankit N. Khambhati;Patrick M. Daly;Patrick M. Daly;Ghassan S. Makhoul;Ghassan S. Makhoul

  • Value of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance–Ultrasound Fusion in Men with Prior Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen

    Geoffrey A. Sonn;Edward Chang;Shyam Natarajan;Daniel J. Margolis

  • Critical period window for spectral tuning defined in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in the rat.

    Etienne de Villers-Sidani;Edward F. Chang;Shaowen Bao;Michael M. Merzenich

  • Contemporary model of language organization: an overview for neurosurgeons

    Edward F Chang;Kunal P Raygor;Mitchel S Berger

  • Selective inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-14 blocks tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis.

    Laetitia Devy;Lili Huang;Laurent Naa;Niranjan Yanamandra

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitchel S. Berger
Mitchel S. Berger University of California, San Francisco
Dario J. Englot
Dario J. Englot Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Nicholas M. Barbaro The University of Texas at Austin
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
John D. Rolston
John D. Rolston University of Utah
Paul A. Garcia
Paul A. Garcia University of California, San Francisco
Robert C. Knowlton
Robert C. Knowlton University of California, San Francisco
Michael W. McDermott
Michael W. McDermott University of California, San Francisco
Tarik Tihan
Tarik Tihan University of California, San Francisco
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Edward F. Chang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles