World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claudio Di Ciccio

Claudio Di Ciccio

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4335
World Ranking
13177
National Ranking
258

Claudio Di Ciccio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Di Ciccio sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Claudio Di Ciccio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Di Ciccio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudio Di Ciccio is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on computer science and business management, with a significant number of publications in the field of information systems. The scientist's work covers both fundamental and applied aspects of several subfields, including information systems, management information systems, artificial intelligence, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and management science and operations research.

The main topics of Claudio Di Ciccio's research include business process modeling and analysis, blockchain technology applications and security, service-oriented architecture and web services, semantic web and ontologies, cloud data security solutions, cryptography and data security, and cloud computing and resource management.

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by Claudio Di Ciccio include:

  • "Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges" (2022), published in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • "The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die" (2023), published in Computers in Industry
  • "Seven Paradoxes of Business Process Management in a Hyper-Connected World" (2020), published in Business & Information Systems Engineering
  • "Monotone Precision and Recall Measures for Comparing Executions and Specifications of Dynamic Systems" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "On the adoption of blockchain for business process monitoring" (2022), published in Software & Systems Modeling

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Claudio Di Ciccio include Edoardo Marangone, Ingo Weber, Jan Mendling, Valerio Goretti, and Luca Barbaro.

The scientist has contributed book publications through Springer Science+Business Media and CEUR-WS.org eBooks. Among these are:

  • "Business Process Management" (2022)
  • "Business Process Management Forum" (2022)
  • "Proceedings of the International Workshop on BPM Problems to Solve Before We Die (PROBLEMS 2021) co-located with the 19th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2021), Rome, Italy, September 6-10, 2021" (2021)

Claudio Di Ciccio's work has appeared frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Information Systems, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, and Computers in Industry, reflecting a broad dissemination of research findings in both conferences and journals.

Best Publications

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Knowledge-Intensive Processes: Characteristics, Requirements and Analysis of Contemporary Approaches

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Andrea Marrella;Alessandro Russo

  • Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges

    Unknown

  • The Internet of Things Meets Business Process Management: A Manifesto

    Christian Janiesch;Agnes Koschmider;Massimo Mecella;Barbara Weber

  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die

    Unknown

  • Foundational Oracle Patterns: Connecting Blockchain to the Off-Chain World

    Roman Mühlberger;Stefan Bachhofner;Eduardo Castelló Ferrer;Claudio Di Ciccio

  • On the Discovery of Declarative Control Flows for Artful Processes

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Massimo Mecella

  • Resolving inconsistencies and redundancies in declarative process models

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Fabrizio Maria Maggi;Marco Montali;Jan Mendling

  • Blockchain Support for Collaborative Business Processes

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Alessio Cecconi;Marlon Dumas;Luciano García-Bañuelos

  • Discovery of Multi-perspective Declarative Process Models

    Stefan Schönig;Claudio Di Ciccio;Fabrizio Maria Maggi;Jan Mendling

  • Knowledge-intensive Processes: An Overview of Contemporary Approaches.

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Andrea Marrella;Alessandro Russo

  • A two-step fast algorithm for the automated discovery of declarative workflows

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Massimo Mecella

  • The Internet-of-Things Meets Business Process Management: Mutual Benefits and Challenges

    Christian Janiesch;Agnes Koschmider;Massimo Mecella;Barbara Weber

  • Predictive Task Monitoring for Business Processes

    Cristina Cabanillas;Claudio Di Ciccio;Jan Mendling;Anne Baumgrass

  • Seven Paradoxes of Business Process Management in a Hyper-Connected World

    Daniel Beverungen;Joos C. A. M. Buijs;Joerg Becker;Claudio Di Ciccio

  • From event streams to process models and back: Challenges and opportunities

    Pnina Soffer;Annika Hinze;Agnes Koschmider;Holger Ziekow

  • Extracting Declarative Process Models from Natural Language.

    Han van der Aa;Claudio Di Ciccio;Henrik Leopold;Hajo A. Reijers

  • Blockchain-Based Traceability of Inter-organisational Business Processes

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Alessio Cecconi;Jan Mendling;Dominik Felix

  • Declarative Process Specifications: Reasoning, Discovery, Monitoring

    Unknown

  • Detecting flight trajectory anomalies and predicting diversions in freight transportation

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Han van der Aa;Cristina Cabanillas;Jan Mendling

  • Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

    Johannes De Smedt;Claudio Di Ciccio;Jan Vanthienen;Jan Mendling

  • Efficient discovery of Target-Branched Declare constraints

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Fabrizio Maria Maggi;Jan Mendling

  • Monotone Precision and Recall Measures for Comparing Executions and Specifications of Dynamic Systems

    Artem Polyvyanyy;Andreas Solti;Matthias Weidlich;Claudio Di Ciccio

  • Generating Event Logs Through the Simulation of Declare Models

    Claudio Di Ciccio;Mario Luca Bernardi;Marta Cimitile;Fabrizio Maria Maggi

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Massimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella Sapienza University of Rome
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
Fabrizio Maria Maggi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Ingo Weber
Ingo Weber Technical University of Berlin
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne
Matthias Weidlich
Matthias Weidlich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mathias Weske
Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech expertise grows, studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many flexible learning and career opportunities. Many universities offer an accelerated computer science degree online, allowing motivated students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce more quickly. These programs often bring the same rigorous curriculum as traditional ones but are tailored for those seeking faster results and more adaptable schedules.

For students concerned about academic history, there are reputable online graduate schools with low gpa requirements. These programs provide second chances for students who may not have achieved high undergraduate grades but are still eager to advance their education in computer science or related fields.

A degree in computer science can also connect you to interdisciplinary careers. For instance, if you're interested in environmental technology, you might consider an environmental engineering degree online. This can be paired with insights about what can you do with an environmental studies degree to unlock roles in sustainable tech, data analysis, and smart infrastructure, blending computing with real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Di Ciccio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles