World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
20779
World Ranking
2551
National Ranking
110

Mathias Weske publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Weske sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 389 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mathias Weske D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Weske sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathias Weske is affiliated with the Hasso Plattner Institute in Germany. Their research activity spans various domains within computer science, business, management, and engineering, focusing particularly on business process modeling and analysis.

The primary fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Computer Science
  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Engineering

Within these broad areas, the scientist has concentrated on several subfields:

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Their core research themes involve the following topics:

  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Robotic Process Automation Applications
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions

Mathias Weske has contributed to various publication venues, frequently appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Business Information Systems
  • Data & Knowledge Engineering
  • Software & Systems Modeling

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges (2022), Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die (2023), Computers in Industry
  • Process-aware digital twin cockpit synthesis from event logs (2022), Journal of Computer Languages
  • A framework for modeling and executing task-Specific resource allocations in business processes (2022), Computing
  • Model Collection of the Business Process Management Academic Initiative (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Collaborations form an important part of their research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Luise Pufahl
  • Maximilian Völker
  • Tom Lichtenstein
  • Stephan Haarmann
  • Anjo Seidel

Best Publications

  • Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures

    Mathias Weske

  • Business process management: a survey

    Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst;Arthur H. M. Ter Hofstede;Mathias Weske

  • Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Mathias Weske

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • The P2P Approach to Interorganizational Workflows

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Mathias Weske

  • Efficient Compliance Checking Using BPMN-Q and Temporal Logic

    Ahmed Awad;Gero Decker;Mathias Weske

  • BPEL4Chor: Extending BPEL for Modeling Choreographies

    G. Decker;O. Kopp;F. Leymann;M. Weske

  • Advances in business process management

    M. Weske;W. M. P. van der Aalst;H. M. W. Verbeek

  • Efficient Consistency Measurement Based on Behavioral Profiles of Process Models

    M Weidlich;J Mendling;M Weske

  • Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges

    Unknown

  • Using the π-calculus for formalizing workflow patterns

    Frank Puhlmann;Mathias Weske

  • The Internet of Things Meets Business Process Management: A Manifesto

    Christian Janiesch;Agnes Koschmider;Massimo Mecella;Barbara Weber

  • Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system

    M. Weske

  • Scientific Workflows: Business as Usual?

    Bertram Ludäscher;Mathias Weske;Timothy Mcphillips;Shawn Bowers

  • Business Process Management Architectures

    Mathias Weske

  • Behavioral similarity: a proper metric

    Matthias Kunze;Matthias Weidlich;Mathias Weske

  • Oryx --- An Open Modeling Platform for the BPM Community

    Gero Decker;Hagen Overdick;Mathias Weske

  • Process compliance analysis based on behavioural profiles

    Matthias Weidlich;Artem Polyvyanyy;Nirmit Desai;Jan Mendling

  • Prediction of Remaining Service Execution Time Using Stochastic Petri Nets with Arbitrary Firing Delays

    Andreas Rogge-Solti;Mathias Weske

  • The biggest business process management problems to solve before we die

    Unknown

  • Business process model abstraction: a definition, catalog, and survey

    Sergey Smirnov;Hajo A. Reijers;Mathias Weske;Thijs Nugteren

  • Advanced Topics In Workflow Management: Issues, Requirements, And Solutions

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Mathias Weske;Guido Wirtz

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Weidlich
Matthias Weidlich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Artem Polyvyanyy
Artem Polyvyanyy University of Melbourne
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Gottfried Vossen
Gottfried Vossen University of Münster
Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm
Claudio Di Ciccio
Claudio Di Ciccio Utrecht University
Remco Dijkman
Remco Dijkman Eindhoven University of Technology
Dirk Fahland
Dirk Fahland Eindhoven University of Technology
Ingo Weber
Ingo Weber Technical University of Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up new career paths for those interested in computer science. For example, data science is in high demand, and students often ask, what is the cheapest data science course in the us? Affordable programs can provide valuable knowledge without a major financial commitment.

If you’re looking to broaden your expertise, consider online electrical engineering courses USA. These online programs make it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments, while gaining practical, in-demand technical skills.

Not everyone has the time for a full degree. Many tech professionals are interested in easy licenses and certifications to get that lead to well-paying jobs. These short-term programs can quickly boost your credentials and open doors to new opportunities.

If a graduate credential is your goal, you might be interested in the shortest masters degree options available online. Accelerated online master’s programs let you earn an advanced degree faster, so you can start reaping the career benefits sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Mathias Weske

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles