World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
7128
World Ranking
9406
National Ranking
3974

David C. Somers publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Somers sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 112 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David C. Somers D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Somers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Somers is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience and medicine, with a substantial emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and imaging techniques.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Somers' work spans various subfields of study such as cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, physiology, biomedical engineering, and neurology. This diverse scope reflects a multidisciplinary approach to brain research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Somers include:

  • Vaibhav Tripathi
  • Sean Tobyne
  • Swathi Kiran
  • Alice Cronin-Golomb
  • David A. Boas

The scientist regularly publishes in several noted venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage

Some recently published papers by David C. Somers include:

  • "Toward Neuroscience of the Everyday World (NEW) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy", 2021, Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering
  • "Stimulus-Specific Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cerebellar Lobule VIIb/VIIIa", 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Extended Frontal Networks for Visual and Auditory Working Memory", 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Neural correlates associated with impaired global motion perception in cerebral visual impairment (CVI)", 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • "Attention and Default Mode Network Assessments of Meditation Experience during Active Cognition and Rest", 2021, Brain Sciences

Best Publications

  • An emergent model of orientation selectivity in cat visual cortical simple cells

    D. C. Somers;S. B. Nelson;Mriganka Sur

  • Functional Mri Reveals Spatially Specific Attentional Modulation in Human Primary Visual Cortex

    David C. Somers;Anders M. Dale;Adriane E. Seiffert;Roger B. H. Tootell

  • Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus

    Jascha D. Swisher;Mark A. Halko;Lotfi B. Merabet;Stephanie A. McMains

  • Rapid synchronization through fast threshold modulation

    David Somers;Nancy Kopell

  • Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex.

    Stephanie A McMains;David C Somers;David C Somers

  • Synchronized oscillations during cooperative feature linking in a cortical model of visual perception

    Stephen Grossberg;David Somers

  • What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses

    Lotfi B. Merabet;Joseph F. Rizzo;Amir Amedi;David C. Somers

  • Subthreshold facilitation and suppression in primary visual cortex revealed by intrinsic signal imaging.

    LJ Toth;SC Rao;Dae-Shik Kim;D Somers

  • A local circuit approach to understanding integration of long-range inputs in primary visual cortex.

    David C. Somers;Emanuel V. Todorov;Athanassios G. Siapas;Louis J. Toth

  • Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing

    Lotfi B. Merabet;Jascha D. Swisher;Stephanie A. McMains;Mark A. Halko

  • Short-Term Memory for Space and Time Flexibly Recruit Complementary Sensory-Biased Frontal Lobe Attention Networks

    Samantha W. Michalka;Lingqiang Kong;Maya L. Rosen;Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham

  • Functional Evidence for a Cerebellar Node of the Dorsal Attention Network.

    James A. Brissenden;Emily J. Levin;David E. Osher;Mark A. Halko

  • Functional MRI Studies of Human Visual Motion Perception: Texture, Luminance, Attention and After-effects

    Adriane E. Seiffert;David C. Somers;Anders M. Dale;Roger B.H. Tootell

  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Visuotopic Posterior Parietal Cortex Emerges with Visual Short-Term Memory Load

    Summer L. Sheremata;Katherine C. Bettencourt;David C. Somers

  • Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity

    Katherine C. Bettencourt;David C. Somers

  • Anti-phase solutions in relaxation oscillators coupled through excitatory interactions.

    Nancy Kopell;David Somers;David Somers

  • Processing Efficiency of Divided Spatial Attention Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex

    Stephanie A McMains;David C Somers

  • Waves and synchrony in networks of oscillators of relaxation and non-relaxation type

    David Somers;Nancy Kopell

  • Auditory Spatial Attention Representations in the Human Cerebral Cortex

    Lingqiang Kong;Samantha W. Michalka;Maya L. Rosen;Summer L. Sheremata

  • Topographic Cortico-cerebellar Networks Revealed by Visual Attention and Working Memory.

    James A. Brissenden;Sean M. Tobyne;David E. Osher;Emily J. Levin

  • Cognitive Control Network Contributions to Memory-Guided Visual Attention

    Maya L. Rosen;Chantal E. Stern;Samantha W. Michalka;Kathryn J. Devaney

  • Cortico-cerebellar networks for visual attention and working memory.

    James A Brissenden;David C Somers

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham
Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham Carnegie Mellon University
Chantal E. Stern
Chantal E. Stern Boston University
Lotfi B. Merabet
Lotfi B. Merabet Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Emanuel Todorov
Emanuel Todorov University of Washington
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Sacha B. Nelson
Sacha B. Nelson Brandeis University
Nancy Kopell
Nancy Kopell Boston University
Roger B. H. Tootell
Roger B. H. Tootell Harvard University
Alice Cronin-Golomb
Alice Cronin-Golomb Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be complemented by related online degrees. For students interested in the intersection of neuroscience and social work, accelerated msw programs online offer a fast track to working with individuals and communities in healthcare or educational settings.

Those who want a broader foundation in mental processes or behavior can explore an online psychology degree, which is highly relevant for roles in research, therapy, or mental health services. For students focused on counseling, choosing cacrep accredited online counseling programs ensures rigorous, industry-recognized training that's essential for licensure.

Additionally, exploring options for an online counseling degree can offer flexibility and affordability for those interested in becoming professional counselors or therapists, especially when paired with neuroscience knowledge. These pathways each provide valuable skills and credentials for advancing in health sciences and mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Somers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles