World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
15428
World Ranking
3643
National Ranking
1677

John T. Serences publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Serences sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 231 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John T. Serences D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Serences sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John T. Serences is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego, in the United States. Their work primarily centers on neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience as evidenced by a significant volume of publications in this subfield.

Their research topics span several key areas within neuroscience, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Visual attention and saliency detection
  • Neural networks and applications

Serences has contributed extensively to the scientific literature, with a substantial number of publications appearing in well-known journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Serences are:

  • "Attractive serial dependence overcomes repulsive neuronal adaptation," 2022, PLoS Biology
  • "An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions," 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Shared Representational Formats for Information Maintained in Working Memory and Information Retrieved from Long-Term Memory," 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Classic Visual Search Effects in an Additional Singleton Task: An Open Dataset," 2021, Journal of Cognition

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Kirsten Adam
  • Margaret M. Henderson
  • Timothy C. Sheehan
  • Timothy F. Brady
  • Sirawaj Itthipuripat

Best Publications

  • Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex

    John T. Serences;Edward F. Ester;Edward K. Vogel;Edward Awh

  • Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts

    Steven Yantis;Steven Yantis;Jens Schwarzbach;Jens Schwarzbach;John T. Serences;Robert L. Carlson;Robert L. Carlson

  • Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence.

    John T. Serences;Steven Yantis

  • Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex

    John T. Serences;Sarah Shomstein;Andrew B. Leber;Xavier Golay;Xavier Golay

  • Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control.

    Steven Yantis;John T Serences

  • Feature-Based Attentional Modulations in the Absence of Direct Visual Stimulation

    John T. Serences;John T. Serences;Geoffrey M. Boynton;Geoffrey M. Boynton

  • Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory

    Edward F. Ester;Thomas C. Sprague;John T. Serences

  • Value-based modulations in human visual cortex.

    John T. Serences

  • Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control

    Taosheng Liu;Scott D. Slotnick;John T. Serences;Steven Yantis

  • Spatially Selective Representations of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Priority in Human Occipital, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex

    John T. Serences;Steven Yantis

  • Control of object-based attention in human cortex.

    John T. Serences;Jens Schwarzbach;Jens Schwarzbach;Susan M. Courtney;Xavier Golay

  • Attention modulates spatial priority maps in the human occipital, parietal and frontal cortices

    Thomas C Sprague;John T Serences

  • Coexisting representations of sensory and mnemonic information in human visual cortex.

    Rosanne L. Rademaker;Chaipat Chunharas;Chaipat Chunharas;John T. Serences

  • Hierarchical Organization of Human Auditory Cortex: Evidence from Acoustic Invariance in the Response to Intelligible Speech

    Kayoko Okada;Feng Rong;Jon Venezia;William Matchin

  • Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex

    Thomas C. Sprague;Edward F. Ester;John T. Serences

  • Spatially global representations in human primary visual cortex during working memory maintenance.

    Edward F. Ester;John T. Serences;Edward Awh

  • The topography of alpha-band activity tracks the content of spatial working memory.

    Joshua J. Foster;David W. Sutterer;John T. Serences;Edward K. Vogel

  • Area Spt in the Human Planum Temporale Supports Sensory-Motor Integration for Speech Processing

    Gregory Hickok;Kayoko Okada;John T. Serences

  • Alpha-Band Oscillations Enable Spatially and Temporally Resolved Tracking of Covert Spatial Attention

    Joshua J. Foster;David W. Sutterer;John T. Serences;Edward K. Vogel

  • A neural measure of precision in visual working memory

    Edward F. Ester;David E. Anderson;John T. Serences;Edward Awh

  • Domain general mechanisms of perceptual decision making in human cortex.

    Tiffany C. Ho;Scott Brown;John T. Serences

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward Awh
Edward Awh University of Chicago
Steven Yantis
Steven Yantis Johns Hopkins University
Edward K. Vogel
Edward K. Vogel University of Chicago
Geoffrey M. Boynton
Geoffrey M. Boynton University of Washington
Tiffany C. Ho
Tiffany C. Ho University of California, San Francisco
Susan M. Courtney
Susan M. Courtney Johns Hopkins University
Scott D. Brown
Scott D. Brown University of Newcastle Australia
Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Zoltán Vidnyánszky University of Vienna
Ramesh Srinivasan
Ramesh Srinivasan University of California, Irvine
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re looking to build a career in neuroscience or a related field, there are a variety of flexible, online options to accelerate your journey. For those eager to enter the workforce faster, pursuing a bachelor degree online in 2 years can save both time and tuition costs, making this pathway increasingly popular among motivated students.

Choosing the right major is just as important as selecting a reputable program. Students interested in brain science often consider programs that blend biology, psychology, or health sciences—fields frequently listed among the best bachelor degrees to get for long-term earning potential. Some may also be interested in exploring the easiest college majors with high pay, such as certain allied health and IT disciplines.

Affordability remains a key issue for prospective students. Fortunately, a growing list of cheap online colleges that accept fafsa offers federal financial aid options, making a neuroscience-related degree more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Serences

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles