World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jens Rassweiler

Jens Rassweiler

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
24513
World Ranking
17070
National Ranking
897

Jens Rassweiler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Rassweiler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 632 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jens Rassweiler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Rassweiler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Rassweiler is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on urology, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their body of work encompasses a variety of subfields, including pediatrics, perinatology, and obstetrics and gynecology.

The main topics addressed in their research involve:

  • Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Ureteral procedures and complications
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments

Jens Rassweiler has authored papers published in a number of respected journals, with frequent contributions in:

  • European Urology
  • World Journal of Urology
  • Der Urologe
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Current Opinion in Urology

Some recent papers featuring Jens Rassweiler as a contributor include:

  • "European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era," 2020, European Urology
  • "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer Patient Management-Current Trends and Future Perspectives," 2021, Diagnostics
  • "Effect of Simulation-based Training on Surgical Proficiency and Patient Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Educational Trial," 2021, European Urology
  • "New multiport robotic surgical systems: a comprehensive literature review of clinical outcomes in urology," 2023, Therapeutic Advances in Urology
  • "Best Practices in Robotic-assisted Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Consensus Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group for Reconstructive Urology," 2020, European Urology

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Ali Serdar Gözen
  • Selçuk Güven
  • Marie-Claire Rassweiler-Seyfried
  • Abdüllatif Aydın
  • Kamran Ahmed

Rassweiler's research integrates clinical and technological approaches, reflecting ongoing developments in robotic surgery, machine learning applications in prostate cancer management, and simulation-based surgical training. Their work addresses a range of urological conditions and treatments, underlining an emphasis on improving both diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes in urology and related surgical fields.

Best Publications

  • Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention.

    Jens Rassweiler;Dogu Teber;Rainer Kuntz;Rainer Hofmann

  • Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Walter Artibani;Andrea Cestari

  • Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

    Maurice Stephan Michel;Lutz Trojan;Jens Jochen Rassweiler

  • Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single Institution

    Jens Rassweiler;Othmar Seemann;Michael Schulze;Dogu Teber

  • LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH THE HEILBRONN TECHNIQUE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 180 CASES

    Jens Rassweiler;Ludger Sentker;Othmar Seemann;Martin Hatzinger

  • COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES IN UROLOGY: EXPERIENCE WITH 2,407 PROCEDURES AT 4 GERMAN CENTERS

    Dirk Fahlenkamp;Jens Rassweiler;Jens Rassweiler;Paolo Fornara;Paolo Fornara;Thomas Frede;Thomas Frede

  • Shock Wave Technology and Application: An Update

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Thomas Knoll;Kai Uwe Köhrmann;James A. McAteer

  • Padeliporfin vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy versus active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer (CLIN1001 PCM301): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial

    Abdel Rahmène Azzouzi;Sébastien Vincendeau;Eric Barret;Antony Cicco

  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the experience of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association.

    Jens Rassweiler;Paolo Fornara;Mathias Weber;Gunther Janetschek

  • LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: The European Experience

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Claude Abbou;Günter Janetschek;Klaus Jeschke

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era.

    Maria J. Ribal;Philip Cornford;Alberto Briganti;Thomas Knoll

  • Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: is it better than open surgery?

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Michael Schulze;Reinaldo Marrero;Thomas Frede

  • Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results.

    Jens Rassweiler;Marcel Hruza;Dogu Teber;Li-Ming Su

  • RETROPERITONEOSCOPY: EXPERIENCE WITH 200 CASES

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Otmar Seemann;Thomas Frede;Thomas O. Henkel

  • Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: experience with more than 1,000 operations.

    Jens Rassweiler;Alexander Tsivian;A.V. Ravi Kumar;Christos Lymberakis

  • Future of robotic surgery in urology.

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Riccardo Autorino;Jan Klein;Alex Mottrie

  • Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy--a critical review.

    Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette;Maria P. Laguna;Jens J. Rassweiler;Pierre Conort

  • Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations.

    Matthias Baumhauer;Marco Feuerstein;Hans Peter Meinzer;J. Rassweiler

  • Ureteral Reimplantation for Management of Ureteral Strictures: A Retrospective Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Techniques

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Ali S. Gözen;Tibet Erdogru;Marto Sugiono

  • Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective

    Inderbir S Gill;Ralph V Clayman;David M Albala;Yoshio Aso

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette
Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette Istanbul Medipol University
Riccardo Autorino
Riccardo Autorino Virginia Commonwealth University
Hans-Peter Meinzer
Hans-Peter Meinzer German Cancer Research Center
Inderbir S. Gill
Inderbir S. Gill University of Southern California
Francesco Porpiglia
Francesco Porpiglia University of Turin
Glenn M. Preminger
Glenn M. Preminger Duke University
Jihad H. Kaouk
Jihad H. Kaouk Cleveland Clinic
Alexandre de la Taille
Alexandre de la Taille Université Paris Cité
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Beat P. Müller-Stich Heidelberg University
Prokar Dasgupta
Prokar Dasgupta King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers outside of or alongside traditional MD training, a range of online nursing programs can open doors in the healthcare field. Many students are drawn to flexible training options that allow them to enter the workforce faster or advance their qualifications while working.

Aspiring nurses can consider accelerated tracks such as a 6 month lpn program, which offers a fast pathway into practical nursing roles. For those aiming at specialized or advanced practice, psych nurse practitioner programs allow you to provide expert mental health care, an area with strong job demand.

For registered nurses seeking top clinical and leadership roles, pursuing accredited online dnp programs can be a strategic move, with options designed for busy professionals. If you value efficiency, you might look into online dnp programs that streamline coursework and residencies.

Taking these online pathways can help you launch or advance a rewarding healthcare career, matching your interests and schedule with a range of roles beyond traditional pre-med routes.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Rassweiler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles