World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
11324
World Ranking
6391
National Ranking
299

Hans-Peter Meinzer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Peter Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 394 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hans-Peter Meinzer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Peter Meinzer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans-Peter Meinzer is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. Their research background, as reflected in available data, does not include detailed records of recent papers or frequent co-authors. Similarly, there are no specific publication venues noted where the scientist has published extensively, nor are there records of book publications linked to their name.

The available data does not specify the main fields or subfields of study in which Meinzer is active, nor does it provide detailed topics of work or a list of awards won. This absence of detailed bibliometric and topical information suggests a limited publicly accessible profile in terms of documented research output or a focus on roles within the scientific community that may not be centered around high-volume publication.

Given the affiliation with a prominent cancer research institution, it is plausible that Meinzer's research activities relate to oncology or biomedical sciences, although no explicit fields or topics are confirmed. The lack of recorded recent papers and coauthors indicates that the scientist might be involved in other capacities such as institutional leadership, technical expertise, or collaborative roles that are not directly tied to frequent first or senior authorship on publications.

Without further data on their citation metrics or significant awards, the profile remains primarily factual and limited to institutional association. The information suggests a scientific career based at a key German research center without publicly catalogued extensive research output or collaborations as documented in commonly accessible research databases.

Best Publications

  • Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review.

    Tobias Heimann;Hans Peter Meinzer

  • Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets

    T. Heimann;B. van Ginneken;M.A. Styner;Y. Arzhaeva

  • The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit

    Ivo Wolf;Marcus Vetter;Ingmar Wegner;Thomas Böttger

  • The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development.

    Marco Nolden;Sascha Zelzer;Alexander Seitel;Diana Wald

  • Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations.

    Matthias Baumhauer;Marco Feuerstein;Hans Peter Meinzer;J. Rassweiler

  • The medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK): a toolkit facilitating the creation of interactive software by extending VTK and ITK

    Ivo Wolf;Marcus Vetter;Ingmar Wegner;Marco Nolden

  • A shape-guided deformable model with evolutionary algorithm initialization for 3D soft tissue segmentation

    Tobias Heimann;Sascha Münzing;Hans-Peter Meinzer;Ivo Wolf

  • Convergent Iterative Closest-Point Algorithm to Accomodate Anisotropic and Inhomogenous Localization Error

    L. Maier-Hein;A. M. Franz;T. R. dos Santos;M. Schmidt

  • 3D active shape models using gradient descent optimization of description length

    Tobias Heimann;Ivo Wolf;Tomos Williams;Hans-Peter Meinzer

  • Interactive segmentation framework of the Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit

    D. Maleike;M. Nolden;H. P. Meinzer;I. Wolf

  • Computerized planning of liver surgery—an overview

    Hans-Peter Meinzer;Matthias Thorn;E S Carlos Cárdenas

  • Physical Models Aiding in Complex Congenital Heart Surgery

    Sibylle Mottl-Link;Michael Hübler;Titus Kühne;Urte Rietdorf

  • iPad-Assisted Percutaneous Access to the Kidney Using Marker-Based Navigation: Initial Clinical Experience

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Michael Müller;Markus Fangerau;Jan Klein

  • Active shape models for a fully automated 3d segmentation of the liver – an evaluation on clinical data

    Tobias Heimann;Ivo Wolf;Hans-Peter Meinzer

  • Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging.

    Hannes G. Kenngott;Martin Wagner;Matthias Gondan;Felix Nickel

  • A Statistical Deformable Model for the Segmentation of Liver CT Volumes

    Tobias Heimann;Hans-Peter Meinzer;Ivo Wolf

  • Mobile augmented reality for computer-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy

    Michael Müller;Marie Claire Rassweiler;Jan Klein;Alexander Seitel

  • Computer-assisted trajectory planning for percutaneous needle insertions.

    Alexander Seitel;Markus Engel;Christof M. Sommer;Boris A. Radeleff

  • Virtual planning of liver resections: image processing, visualization and volumetric evaluation

    Gerald Glombitza;Wolfram Lamadé;Athanasios M. Demiris;Marc Roger Göpfert

  • Augmented Reality Visualization During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

    Tobias Simpfendörfer;Matthias Baumhauer;Michael Müller;Carsten N. Gutt

  • The Heidelberg ray tracing model

    H.-P. Meinzer;K. Meetz;D. Scheppelmann;U. Engelmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Lena Maier-Hein
Lena Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Heinz Handels
Heinz Handels University of Lübeck
Beat P. Müller-Stich
Beat P. Müller-Stich Heidelberg University
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor Heidelberg University
Jens Rassweiler
Jens Rassweiler Heidelberg University
Klaus H. Maier-Hein
Klaus H. Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Michael Muller
Michael Muller IBM (United States)
Markus W. Büchler
Markus W. Büchler Champalimaud Foundation
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer German Cancer Research Center
Stefanie Speidel
Stefanie Speidel National Center for Tumor Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online degree options. For those seeking affordability, many of the cheapest online college programs offer accredited Computer Science curriculums without breaking the bank.

Admission concerns, like a lower GPA, shouldn’t stop you from pursuing your goals. There are several online colleges that accept low gpa, providing support and flexible learning opportunities to help you succeed.

Accelerated online programs are designed for motivated students aiming to complete their degree quickly. Explore computer science accelerated program options to fast-track your studies and enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond Computer Science, tech-savvy graduates might also be interested in high-growth fields like environmental science. There are high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds, ranging from data analysis to project management — all benefiting from computing skills.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Peter Meinzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles