World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 99 8423 7915 4354 4029 332 54349

Steven N. Goodman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven N. Goodman between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven N. Goodman published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2008. 33 of the 442 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2008. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 65 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 8 publications
1985 2026

442 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven N. Goodman: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 4
1992 5
1993 8
1994 12
1995 10
1996 7
1997 2
1998 9
1999 6
2000 13
2001 11
2002 11
2003 14
2004 11
2005 12
2006 9
2007 9
2008 65
2009 14
2010 6
2011 10
2012 7
2013 20
2014 6
2015 9
2016 6
2017 7
2018 16
2019 10
2020 23
2021 13
2022 8
2023 21
2024 6
2025 25
2026 8
Total 442
Download as CSV

Steven N. Goodman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven N. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 332 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 332
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven N. Goodman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven N. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 99
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Steven N. Goodman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across various subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Economics and Econometrics; Infectious Diseases; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine; and Neurology.

The scientist's work spans several key topics such as Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts, Ethics in Clinical Research, and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials.

Steven N. Goodman has published multiple papers in reputable academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • JAMA
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • BMJ

Notable recent papers include:

  • Assessment of the Frequency and Variety of Persistent Symptoms Among Patients With COVID-19, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 from an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Association of Convalescent Plasma Treatment With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19, 2021, JAMA
  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, 2025, BMJ
  • CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials, 2025, The Lancet

Steven N. Goodman frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include:

  • John P. A. Ioannidis
  • David Moher
  • Frank W. Rockhold
  • Sally Hopewell
  • Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

In recognition of contributions to the field, the scientist was named a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations

    Sander Greenland;Stephen J. Senn;Kenneth J. Rothman;John B. Carlin

  • Circulating Mutant DNA to Assess Tumor Dynamics

    Frank Diehl;Luis Diaz;Kenneth W. Kinzler;Bert Vogelstein

  • Inactivation of the DNA-Repair Gene MGMT and the Clinical Response of Gliomas to Alkylating Agents

    Manel Esteller;Jesus Garcia-Foncillas;Esther Andion;Steven N. Goodman

  • Very High Risk of Cancer in Familial Peutz—Jeghers Syndrome

    Francis M. Giardiello;Jill D. Brensinger;Anne C. Tersmette;Steven N. Goodman

  • Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy

    Steven N. Goodman

  • Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A New Nomenclature and Classification System for Pancreatic Duct Lesions

    R H Hruban;N V Adsay;J Albores-Saavedra;C Compton

  • Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors.

    Frank Diehl;Meng Li;Devin Dressman;Yiping He

  • What does research reproducibility mean

    Steven N. Goodman;Daniele Fanelli;John P. A. Ioannidis

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients

    Charles J. Yeo;John L. Cameron;Keith D. Lillemoe;James V. Sitzmann

  • Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    David J. Bradley;Elizabeth A. Bradley;Elizabeth A. Bradley;Kenneth L. Baughman;Kenneth L. Baughman;Ronald D. Berger

  • Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes Factor

    Steven N. Goodman

  • Tumor-suppressive Pathways in Pancreatic Carcinoma

    Ester Rozenblum;Mieke Schutte;Michael Goggins;Stephan A. Hahn

  • K-ras oncogene activation in adenocarcinoma of the human pancreas. A study of 82 carcinomas using a combination of mutant-enriched polymerase chain reaction analysis and allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization.

    R. H. Hruban;A. D.M. Van Mansfeld;G. J.A. Offerhaus;D. H.J. Van Weering

  • Molecular Assessment of Histopathological Staging in Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

    Joseph A. Brennan;Li Mao;Ralph H. Hruban;Jay O. Boyle

  • Association between Cigarette Smoking and Mutation of the p53 Gene in Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

    Joseph A. Brennan;Jay O. Boyle;Wayne M. Koch;Steven N. Goodman

  • Adalimumab with or without Methotrexate in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Daniel J. Lovell;Nicolino Ruperto;Steven Goodman;Andreas Reiff

  • The Use of Predicted Confidence Intervals When Planning Experiments and the Misuse of Power When Interpreting Results

    Steven N. Goodman;Jesse A. Berlin

  • Assessment of the Frequency and Variety of Persistent Symptoms Among Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

    Tahmina Nasserie;Michael Hittle;Steven N. Goodman

  • Cardiac Resynchronization and Death From Progressive Heart Failure

    David J. Bradley;Elizabeth A. Bradley;Kenneth L. Baughman;Ronald D. Berger

  • CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials

    K F Schulz;D G Altman;D Moher;D Moher;V Barbour

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric B. Bass
Eric B. Bass Johns Hopkins University
Antonio C. Wolff
Antonio C. Wolff Johns Hopkins University
Giovanni Parmigiani
Giovanni Parmigiani Harvard University
John P. A. Ioannidis
John P. A. Ioannidis Stanford University
Ralph H. Hruban
Ralph H. Hruban Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Marianna Zahurak
Marianna Zahurak Johns Hopkins University
Neil R. Powe
Neil R. Powe University of California, San Francisco
David Sidransky
David Sidransky Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Bert Vogelstein
Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University
Kenneth W. Kinzler
Kenneth W. Kinzler Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Medicine in the USA but want flexible learning options, a variety of online healthcare degrees can open doors to rewarding careers. Many students start with entry-level roles, such as medical records or billing specialists, before progressing to advanced nursing or clinical positions.

Begin your journey by exploring rhia certification programs online to gain expertise in health data management. Those drawn to the administrative side of healthcare can benefit from reputable medical billing and coding classes online, which prepare students for in-demand certifications.

For those aspiring to patient care, there are a range of cheapest fnp programs available online, making it easier to become a Family Nurse Practitioner without the heavy financial burden. Alternatively, prospective nurses can enroll in affordable nursing programs that offer accredited pathways to an RN or BSN degree.

Each of these online options provides flexible schedules, competitive tuition rates, and the ability to balance professional or family commitments. With the right program, you can advance your healthcare career entirely online.

Best Scientists Citing Steven N. Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles