World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
9037
World Ranking
6196
National Ranking
131

Luc Soler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Soler sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Luc Soler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc Soler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luc Soler is affiliated with the University of Strasbourg in France and conducts research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Engineering. Their work spans several subfields including Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics that Luc Soler's research covers include:

  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection

Luc Soler has contributed to multiple publications with titles and venues as follows:

  • "Definitions of Computer-Assisted Surgery and Intervention, Image-Guided Surgery and Intervention, Hybrid Operating Room, and Guidance Systems," 2020, Annals of Surgery Open
  • "U-Net Transformer: Self and Cross Attention for Medical Image Segmentation," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Iterative confidence relabeling with deep ConvNets for organ segmentation with partial labels," 2021, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
  • "A novel, automated, quantification of abnormal lung parenchyma in patients with COVID-19 infection: Initial description of feasibility and association with clinical outcome," 2020, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
  • "Anatomie virtuelle et augmentée pour la chirurgie," 2022, Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Jacques Marescaux
  • Michèle Diana
  • Didier Mutter
  • Patrick Pessaux
  • Alexandre Hostettler

Their research has appeared repeatedly in the following venues:

  • Annals of Surgery Open
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
  • Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
  • Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine

Best Publications

  • The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

    Patrick Bilic;Patrick Ferdinand Christ;Eugene Vorontsov;Grzegorz Chlebus

  • Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology.

    Stéphane Nicolau;Luc Soler;Didier Mutter;Jacques Marescaux

  • Fully automatic anatomical, pathological, and functional segmentation from CT scans for hepatic surgery

    Luc Soler;Herve Delingette;Gregoire Malandain;Johan Montagnat

  • Fully automatic anatomical, pathological, and functional segmentation from CT scans for hepatic surgery

    Luc Soler;Herve Delingette;Gregoire Malandain;Johan Montagnat

  • The status of augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery as of 2016.

    Sylvain Bernhardt;Stéphane A. Nicolau;Luc Soler;Christophe Doignon

  • Autonomous 3-D positioning of surgical instruments in robotized laparoscopic surgery using visual servoing

    A. Krupa;J. Gangloff;C. Doignon;M.F. de Mathelin

  • Active filtering of physiological motion in robotized surgery using predictive control

    R. Ginhoux;J. Gangloff;M. de Mathelin;L. Soler

  • Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

    Jacques Marescaux;Francesco Rubino;Mara Arenas;Didier Mutter

  • Towards cybernetic surgery: robotic and augmented reality-assisted liver segmentectomy

    Patrick Pessaux;Michele Diana;Luc Soler;Tullio Piardi

  • Enhanced-reality video fluorescence: a real-time assessment of intestinal viability.

    Michele Diana;Eric Noll;Pierre Diemunsch;Bernard Dallemagne

  • U-Net Transformer: Self and Cross Attention for Medical Image Segmentation

    Olivier Petit;Nicolas Thome;Clement Rambour;Loic Themyr

  • IN VIVO STUDY OF FORCES DURING NEEDLE INSERTIONS

    B. Maurin;L. Barbe;B. Bayle;P. Zanne

  • Live Tracking and Dense Reconstruction for Handheld Monocular Endoscopy

    Nader Mahmoud;Toby Collins;Alexandre Hostettler;Luc Soler

  • An augmented reality system for liver thermal ablation: design and evaluation on clinical cases.

    Stéphane Nicolau;Xavier Pennec;Luc Soler;Xavier Buy

  • Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery

    Luc Soler;Stephane Nicolau;Patrick Pessaux;Didier Mutter

  • Beating heart tracking in robotic surgery using 500 Hz visual servoing, model predictive control and an adaptive observer

    R. Ginhoux;J.A. Gangloff;M.F. de Mathelin;L. Soler

  • Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: simulation, planning, and contribution of virtual reality and haptics.

    Caroline Villard;Luc Soler;Afshin Gangi

  • ORBSLAM-Based Endoscope Tracking and 3D Reconstruction

    Nader Mahmoud;Iñigo Cirauqui;Alexandre Hostettler;Christophe Doignon

  • Augmented Reality Guidance for the Resection of Missing Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Initial Experience.

    Dimitrios Ntourakis;Ricardo Memeo;Luc Soler;Jacques Marescaux

  • An augmented reality system to guide radio-frequency tumour ablation

    Stéphane Nicolau;Alain Garcia;Xavier Pennec;Luc Soler

  • Model predictive control for compensation of cyclic organ motions in teleoperated laparoscopic surgery

    J. Gangloff;R. Ginhoux;M. de Mathelin;L. Soler

  • Virtual and Augmented Reality in Oncologic Liver Surgery.

    Giuseppe Quero;Alfonso Lapergola;Luc Soler;Muhammad Shahbaz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacques Marescaux
Jacques Marescaux University of Strasbourg
Nicholas Ayache
Nicholas Ayache French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Xavier Pennec
Xavier Pennec French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Grégoire Malandain
Grégoire Malandain French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Hervé Delingette
Hervé Delingette French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
José María Martínez Montiel
José María Martínez Montiel University of Zaragoza
Johan Montagnat
Johan Montagnat Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Guillaume Morel
Guillaume Morel Sorbonne University
Nicolas Thome
Nicolas Thome Sorbonne University
Nicolas Demartines
Nicolas Demartines University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse educational paths online. Whether you’re just starting out or continuing your education, online degrees offer flexibility and accessibility to fit your schedule and budget.

If you want to fast-track your career, consider enrolling in one of the fastest online master's degree programs. These allow you to gain advanced knowledge and credentials in a shorter time frame, helping you quickly pursue specialized roles.

For those interested in maximizing job opportunities, check out the most in demand masters degrees. Fields like data science, AI, and cybersecurity are especially popular and offer competitive salaries.

Not ready for a full bachelor’s or master’s program? An associates degree online can help you build foundational skills and qualify for entry-level positions in tech.

Cost is a major factor for many students. Fortunately, there are plenty of affordable online degree programs that offer high-quality education without a hefty price tag.

Best Scientists Citing Luc Soler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles