World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
China
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
114
Citations
56951
World Ranking
192
National Ranking
24

Pheng-Ann Heng publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pheng-Ann Heng sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 863 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Pheng-Ann Heng D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pheng-Ann Heng sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in China Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in China Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in China Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in China Leader Award

Overview

Pheng-Ann Heng is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China. Their research work spans primarily across the fields of Computer Science and Medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields.

The main areas of study include:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Molecular Biology

Pheng-Ann Heng's published research extensively covers topics such as:

  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Nature Communications

Pheng-Ann Heng has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, highlighting ongoing research partnerships. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Qi Dou
  • Yueming Jin
  • Chi-Wing Fu
  • Guangyong Chen
  • Hao Chen

Notable recent publications include:

  • The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • Transformation-Consistent Self-Ensembling Model for Semisupervised Medical Image Segmentation, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • A global benchmark of algorithms for segmenting the left atrium from late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 2020, Medical Image Analysis
  • Unsupervised Bidirectional Cross-Modality Adaptation via Deeply Synergistic Image and Feature Alignment for Medical Image Segmentation, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • A Survey on Generative Diffusion Models, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

    Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi;Mitko Veta;Paul Johannes van Diest;Bram van Ginneken

  • H-DenseUNet: Hybrid Densely Connected UNet for Liver and Tumor Segmentation From CT Volumes

    Xiaomeng Li;Hao Chen;Xiaojuan Qi;Qi Dou

  • Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved?

    Olivier Bernard;Alain Lalande;Clement Zotti;Frederick Cervenansky

  • Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

    Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio;Alberto Traverso;Thomas de Bel;Moira S.N. Berens

  • Automated Melanoma Recognition in Dermoscopy Images via Very Deep Residual Networks

    Lequan Yu;Hao Chen;Qi Dou;Jing Qin

  • The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

    Patrick Bilic;Patrick Ferdinand Christ;Eugene Vorontsov;Grzegorz Chlebus

  • Uncertainty-Aware Self-ensembling Model for Semi-supervised 3D Left Atrium Segmentation

    Lequan Yu;Shujun Wang;Xiaomeng Li;Chi Wing Fu

  • Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The GlaS challenge contest

    Korsuk Sirinukunwattana;Josien P.W. Pluim;Hao Chen;Xiaojuan Qi

  • VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images

    Hao Chen;Qi Dou;Lequan Yu;Jing Qin

  • Automatic Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds From MR Images via 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

    Qi Dou;Hao Chen;Lequan Yu;Lei Zhao

  • REFUGE Challenge: A unified framework for evaluating automated methods for glaucoma assessment from fundus photographs

    José Ignacio Orlando;Huazhu Fu;João Barbossa Breda;Karel van Keer

  • DCAN: Deep Contour-Aware Networks for Accurate Gland Segmentation

    Hao Chen;Xiaojuan Qi;Lequan Yu;Pheng-Ann Heng

  • PU-Net: Point Cloud Upsampling Network

    Lequan Yu;Xianzhi Li;Chi-Wing Fu;Daniel Cohen-Or

  • 3D deeply supervised network for automated segmentation of volumetric medical images.

    Qi Dou;Lequan Yu;Hao Chen;Yueming Jin

  • Multilevel Contextual 3-D CNNs for False Positive Reduction in Pulmonary Nodule Detection

    Qi Dou;Hao Chen;Lequan Yu;Jing Qin

  • A new method of feature fusion and its application in image recognition

    Quan-Sen Sun;Sheng-Gen Zeng;Yan Liu;Pheng-Ann Heng

  • R³Net: Recurrent Residual Refinement Network for Saliency Detection

    Zijun Deng;Xiaowei Hu;Lei Zhu;Lei Zhu;Xuemiao Xu

  • DCAN: Deep contour-aware networks for object instance segmentation from histology images

    Hao Chen;Xiaojuan Qi;Lequan Yu;Qi Dou

  • FedDG: Federated Domain Generalization on Medical Image Segmentation via Episodic Learning in Continuous Frequency Space

    Quande Liu;Cheng Chen;Jing Qin;Qi Dou

  • Transformation-Consistent Self-Ensembling Model for Semisupervised Medical Image Segmentation

    Xiaomeng Li;Lequan Yu;Hao Chen;Chi-Wing Fu

  • Standard Plane Localization in Fetal Ultrasound via Domain Transferred Deep Neural Networks

    Hao Chen;Dong Ni;Jing Qin;Shengli Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Hao Chen
Hao Chen Chinese University of Hong Kong
Tien-Tsin Wong
Tien-Tsin Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Qi Dou
Qi Dou Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jing Qin
Jing Qin Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Chi-Wing Fu
Chi-Wing Fu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lequan Yu
Lequan Yu University of Hong Kong
Dong Ni
Dong Ni Shenzhen University
Kup-Sze Choi
Kup-Sze Choi Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Kwong-Sak Leung
Kwong-Sak Leung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Daniel Cohen-Or
Daniel Cohen-Or Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online learning opens up a range of flexible, affordable options for computer science students. Associates degrees online are perfect for those starting their academic journey or looking to quickly develop foundational tech skills. These programs may lead directly to entry-level roles or act as a stepping stone to a bachelor’s program.

Cost is a significant consideration, and many cheap online colleges provide recognized qualifications without the high price tag. This makes advancing your education more accessible, even on a limited budget.

If your academic record is a concern, especially if you have a lower GPA, there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa that could provide a valuable pathway forward. These institutions recognize potential beyond grades and can help working professionals or non-traditional students continue their studies.

Wondering where online degrees can take you? While computer science opens doors in technology, you may also consider related fields. For example, explore what can i do with an environmental science degree to see career options at the intersection of technology and environmental solutions.

Best Scientists Citing Pheng-Ann Heng

Trending Scientists