World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
149
Citations
71609
World Ranking
1213
National Ranking
702

Inderbir S. Gill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderbir S. Gill sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,481 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Inderbir S. Gill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderbir S. Gill sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 149 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Inderbir S. Gill is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with a substantial body of work in subfields such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, urology, and oncology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to cancer diagnosis and treatment, particularly in urology. Their main research themes include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Inderbir S. Gill has published numerous papers in several prominent venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Journal of Urology (120 publications)
  • European Urology (27 publications)
  • European Urology Open Science (18 publications)
  • European Urology Focus (12 publications)
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations (10 publications)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Trends in Incidence of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the US," 2022, published in JAMA Network Open
  • "Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis," 2024, published in BMJ
  • "Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications," 2020, published in Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica
  • "Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," 2021, published in European Urology Oncology
  • "Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought," 2020, published in European Urology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Giovanni Cacciamani
  • Mihir Desai
  • Andre Luis Abreu
  • Vinay Duddalwar
  • Manju Aron

Inderbir S. Gill's research output shows a multidisciplinary approach combining clinical practice with advances in medical imaging and artificial intelligence, particularly applied to urological cancers and treatments.

Best Publications

  • MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

    Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Antti S. Rannikko;Marcelo Borghi;Valeria Panebianco

  • Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.

    Inderbir S. Gill;Louis R. Kavoussi;Brian R. Lane;Michael L. Blute

  • Every Minute Counts When the Renal Hilum Is Clamped During Partial Nephrectomy

    R. Houston Thompson;Brian R. Lane;Christine M. Lohse;Bradley C. Leibovich

  • Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.

    Inderbir S. Gill;Surena F. Matin;Mihir M. Desai;Jihad H. Kaouk

  • LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR RENAL TUMOR: DUPLICATING OPEN SURGICAL TECHNIQUES

    Inderbir S. Gill;Mihir M. Desai;Jihad H. Kaouk;Anoop M. Meraney

  • Transumbilical Single-Port Surgery: Evolution and Current Status

    David Canes;Mihir M. Desai;Monish Aron;Georges-Pascal Haber

  • Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: Initial Experience

    Jihad H. Kaouk;George Pascal Haber;Raj K. Goel;Mihir M. Desai

  • Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report

    Mihir M. Desai;Pradeep P. Rao;Monish Aron;Georges Pascal-Haber

  • Clinical practice. Small renal mass.

    Inderbir S. Gill;Monish Aron;Debra A. Gervais;Michael A.S. Jewett

  • Assessing the Impact of Ischaemia Time During Partial Nephrectomy

    Frank Becker;Hendrik Van Poppel;Oliver W Hakenberg;Christian Stief

  • Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years.

    Inderbir S. Gill;Erick M. Remer;Waleed A. Hasan;Brenda Strzempkowski

  • Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy

    Inderbir S. Gill;David Canes;Monish Aron;Georges-Pascal Haber

  • Kidney Tumor Location Measurement Using the C Index Method

    Matthew N. Simmons;Christina B. Ching;Mary K. Samplaski;Chin Hyong Park

  • Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group.

    Caroline M. Moore;Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Scott Eggener;Mark Emberton

  • “Zero Ischemia” Partial Nephrectomy: Novel Laparoscopic and Robotic Technique

    Inderbir S. Gill;Manuel S. Eisenberg;Monish Aron;Andre Berger

  • Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems

    Gyung Tak Sung;Inderbir S Gill

  • Complications of Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in 185 Patients: A Multi-Institutional Review

    Inderbir S. Gill;Louis R. Kavoussi;Ralph V. Clayman;Richard Ehrlich

  • 5-Year Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

    Brian R. Lane;Inderbir S. Gill

  • Factors Predicting Renal Functional Outcome After Partial Nephrectomy

    Brian R. Lane;Denise C. Babineau;Emilio D. Poggio;Christopher J. Weight

  • Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients1

    I.S Gill;S.F Matin;M.M Desai;J.H Kaouk

Frequent Co-Authors

Mihir M. Desai
Mihir M. Desai University of Southern California
Jihad H. Kaouk
Jihad H. Kaouk Cleveland Clinic
Andrew C. Novick
Andrew C. Novick Cleveland Clinic
Steven C. Campbell
Steven C. Campbell Cleveland Clinic
Prokar Dasgupta
Prokar Dasgupta King's College London
David I. Quinn
David I. Quinn University of Southern California
Antonio Finelli
Antonio Finelli University Health Network
Walter Artibani
Walter Artibani University of Verona
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Surena F. Matin
Surena F. Matin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary pathways in healthcare can broaden your career options beyond a traditional MD. Many students opt for specialized online programs designed for flexibility and career advancement. For those already holding an associate degree in nursing, asn to fnp programs offer a direct route to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, opening doors to advanced clinical roles.

Growing demand for nutrition experts has led to the popularity of online nutrition degree programs. These programs prepare students for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and public health. If you are interested in healthcare leadership or administration, consider enrolling in one of the best mha programs, which can lead to hospital management or policy positions.

Finally, current nurses looking to quickly boost their credentials may benefit from online rn to bsn programs without clinicals. These allow RNs to complete their bachelor’s degrees entirely online, making education accessible while continuing to work. Each of these pathways supports a dynamic, evolving healthcare landscape in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Inderbir S. Gill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles