World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
31070
World Ranking
10120
National Ranking
974

Prokar Dasgupta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prokar Dasgupta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,027 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Prokar Dasgupta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prokar Dasgupta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Prokar Dasgupta is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine, with specific contributions to surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, biomedical engineering, and urology. Their work encompasses a variety of research topics including surgical simulation and training, prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, anatomy and medical technology, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, renal cell carcinoma treatment, and urological disorders and treatments.

Among their recent papers are:

  • COVID-19 and urology: a comprehensive review of the literature, 2020, British Journal of Urology
  • Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications, 2020, Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica
  • Slowdown of urology residents' learning curve during the COVID-19 emergency, 2020, British Journal of Urology
  • A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology, 2020, Eye
  • Depression, anxiety, and suicidality in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, 2020, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Dasgupta frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Kamran Ahmed, Ben Challacombe, Nicholas Raison, Abdüllatif Aydın, and Alexandre Mottrie.

Their research outputs have been published widely in multiple venues, predominantly in the following journals:

  • British Journal of Urology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Journal of Robotic Surgery
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their academic portfolio reflects a specialized focus on surgery-related medical research, with 166 publications in surgery alone, and a strong presence in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their interest and expertise extend to oncology and biomedical engineering, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to medical science and urology.

Best Publications

  • State-of-the-Art in Force and Tactile Sensing for Minimally Invasive Surgery

    P. Puangmali;K. Althoefer;L.D. Seneviratne;D. Murphy

  • DECREASED SENSORY RECEPTORS P2X3 AND TRPV1 IN SUBUROTHELIAL NERVE FIBERS FOLLOWING INTRADETRUSOR INJECTIONS OF BOTULINUM TOXIN FOR HUMAN DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY

    A. Apostolidis;R. Popat;Y. Yiangou;D. Cockayne

  • Proposed Mechanism for the Efficacy of Injected Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Human Detrusor Overactivity

    Apostolos Apostolidis;Prokar Dasgupta;Clare J. Fowler

  • Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin-A for Treating Idiopathic Detrusor Overactivity: Results From a Single Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

    Arun Sahai;Mohammad Shamim Khan;Prokar Dasgupta

  • Recommendations on the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of lower urinary tract disorders and pelvic floor dysfunctions: a European consensus report.

    Apostolos Apostolidis;Prokar Dasgupta;Pierre Denys;Sohier Elneil

  • A Single-centre Early Phase Randomised Controlled Three-arm Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy (CORAL).

    Muhammad Shamim Khan;Muhammad Shamim Khan;Christine Gan;Kamran Ahmed;Ahmad Fahim Ismail

  • Urinary tract infections: new insights into a common problem

    R Kucheria;P Dasgupta;S H Sacks;M S Khan

  • A comparison between the response of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity and neurogenic detrusor overactivity to the first intradetrusor injection of botulinum-A toxin.

    Roshni Popat;Apostolos Apostolidis;Vinay Kalsi;Gwendoline Gonzales

  • Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators – a systematic review

    Hamid Abboudi;Mohammad Shamim Khan;Omar Aboumarzouk;Khurshid A. Guru

  • Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

    Kamran Ahmed;Shahid A. Khan;Matthew H. Hayn;Piyush K. Agarwal

  • Miniature 3-Axis Distal Force Sensor for Minimally Invasive Surgical Palpation

    P. Puangmali;Hongbin Liu;L. D. Seneviratne;P. Dasgupta

  • Future of robotic surgery in urology.

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Riccardo Autorino;Jan Klein;Alex Mottrie

  • Kinematic design considerations for minimally invasive surgical robots: an overview.

    Chin-Hsing Kuo;Jian S. Dai;Prokar Dasgupta

  • Contemporary Management of Lower Urinary Tract Disease With Botulinum Toxin A: A Systematic Review of Botox (OnabotulinumtoxinA) and Dysport (AbobotulinumtoxinA)

    Altaf Mangera;Karl-Erik Andersson;Apostolos Apostolidis;Chris Chapple

  • The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the international robotic cystectomy consortium

    Matthew H. Hayn;Abid Hussain;Ahmed M. Mansour;Paul E. Andrews

  • Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database.

    Jeffrey J. Leow;Steven L. Chang;Christian P. Meyer;Ye Wang

  • Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve’: methods, variables and competency

    Nuzhath Khan;Hamid Abboudi;Mohammed Shamim Khan;Prokar Dasgupta

  • Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review

    Hamid Abboudi;Mohammed Shamim Khan;Khurshid A. Guru;Saied Froghi

  • Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer

    Grace Cheung;Arun Sahai;Michele Billia;Prokar Dasgupta

  • Urodynamic results and clinical outcomes with intradetrusor injections of onabotulinumtoxina in a randomized, placebo-controlled dose-finding study in idiopathic overactive bladder†‡

    Eric Rovner;Michael Kennelly;Heinrich Schulte-Baukloh;Jihao Zhou;Jihao Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Kaspar Althoefer
Kaspar Althoefer Queen Mary University of London
Lakmal Seneviratne
Lakmal Seneviratne Khalifa University
Mani Menon
Mani Menon Henry Ford Hospital
Francesco Porpiglia
Francesco Porpiglia University of Turin
Inderbir S. Gill
Inderbir S. Gill University of Southern California
Henk G. van der Poel
Henk G. van der Poel Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Giacomo Novara
Giacomo Novara University of Padua
Clare J. Fowler
Clare J. Fowler University College London
Adam S. Kibel
Adam S. Kibel Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of medical education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with online degrees creating new entry points and career advancement opportunities. For aspiring nurses, online lpn programs offer fast-track options to start working in healthcare, often allowing you to study at your own pace.

Registered nurses looking to further their education may be interested in rn bsn online programs no clinicals. These flexible programs are ideal for working professionals and can help open doors to more advanced roles.

For those holding a master’s degree in nursing, the demand for highly qualified practitioners is growing. The shortest post master's dnp program options allow you to accelerate your pathway to a terminal nursing degree. Alternatively, a variety of online dnp programs exist to support nurses in achieving leadership positions without sacrificing job stability.

As these pathways expand, students should research program accreditation, time commitment, and career objectives to ensure the best fit for their future in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Prokar Dasgupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles