World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
44936
World Ranking
9898
National Ranking
304

Morgan Rouprêt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morgan Rouprêt sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,297 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Morgan Rouprêt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Morgan Rouprêt sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Morgan Rouprêt is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has an extensive publication record mainly focused on urology and oncology within the medical field. Their research contributions span several aspects of bladder, urinary tract, and prostate cancers, reflected in numerous publications in leading journals and collaborations with other experts in the field.

Their recent publications include:

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update, 2020, European Urology
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update, 2023, European Urology

Morgan Rouprêt's frequent co-authors include Thomas Seisen, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Benjamin Pradère, Ugo Pinar, and Francesco Soria. This network of collaborators indicates sustained teamwork on urological oncology research topics over multiple studies.

Publication venues where Rouprêt has consistently contributed include:

  • European Urology
  • European Urology Oncology
  • Progrès en Urologie
  • The Journal of Urology
  • World Journal of Urology

Their work is situated primarily within the broad scientific field of Medicine. More specifically, they publish extensively in subfields such as Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology, Oncology, and Rheumatology. This range highlights a cross-disciplinary approach focused on clinical and surgical aspects of cancer treatment and diagnostics.

The main research topics explored by Morgan Rouprêt highlight a concentration on:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Among the notable papers where Morgan Rouprêt is credited for contributions on urological oncology guidelines and classification systems are prominently published in European Urology. These include updates on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and involvement in multidisciplinary guideline panels.

Best Publications

  • EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016.

    Marko Babjuk;Andreas Böhle;Maximilian Burger;Otakar Capoun

  • EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013

    Marko Babjuk;Maximilian Burger;Richard Zigeuner;Shahrokh F. Shariat

  • [EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update].

    M. Babjuk;W. Oosterlinck;R. Sylvester;E. Kaasinen

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update

    Morgan Rouprêt;Marko Babjuk;Eva Compérat;Richard Zigeuner

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update.

    Marko Babjuk;Marko Babjuk;Maximilian Burger;Eva M. Compérat;Paolo Gontero

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ).

    Marko Babjuk;Marko Babjuk;Maximilian Burger;Otakar Capoun;Daniel Cohen

  • European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas, 2011 update

    M. Rouprêt;R. Zigeuner;J. Palou;A. Boehle

  • [Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations].

    D. Mitropoulos;W. Artibani;M. Graefen;M. Remzi

  • European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update.

    Morgan Rouprêt;Marko Babjuk;Eva Compérat;Richard Zigeuner

  • Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

    Giovanni Lughezzani;Maximilian Burger;Vitaly Margulis;Surena F. Matin

  • Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and the Upper Tract: Disparate Twins

    David A. Green;Michael Rink;Evanguelos Xylinas;Surena F. Matin

  • Environmental factors involved in carcinogenesis of urothelial cell carcinomas of the upper urinary tract.

    Pierre Colin;Philippe Koenig;Adil Ouzzane;Nicolas Berthon

  • Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery.

    Karim Bensalah;Allan J. Pantuck;Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq;Rodolphe Thuret

  • Oncologic Outcomes of Kidney-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the EAU Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel

    Thomas Seisen;Benoit Peyronnet;Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig;Harman M. Bruins

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era.

    Maria J. Ribal;Philip Cornford;Alberto Briganti;Thomas Knoll

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy to Treat Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    Thomas Seisen;Benjamin Granger;Pierre Colin;Priscilla Léon

  • European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel.

    Richard J. Sylvester;Oscar Rodríguez;Virginia Hernández;Diana Turturica

  • Career choices of medical students: a national survey of 1780 students.

    Jérémie H Lefevre;Morgan Roupret;Solen Kerneis;Laurent Karila

  • Validation of the Clavien–Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel

    Dionysios Mitropoulos;Walter Artibani;Chandra Shekhar Biyani;Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen

  • Prognostic Performance and Reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Grading Classification Systems in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review

    Viktor Soukup;Otakar Čapoun;Daniel Cohen;Virginia Hernández

Frequent Co-Authors

Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Olivier Cussenot
Olivier Cussenot Université Paris Cité
Eva Comperat
Eva Comperat Sorbonne University
Alberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Alexandre de la Taille
Alexandre de la Taille Université Paris Cité
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Richard Zigeuner
Richard Zigeuner Medical University of Graz
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Laurent Salomon
Laurent Salomon Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to a wide range of related fields and online programs that can complement or provide alternative pathways in healthcare. Many students interested in leadership roles opt for an accelerated healthcare administration degree online, which offers a fast-tracked route to managing medical facilities and services.

For those looking to advance their nursing career, the asn to fnp bridge program is a flexible option. This path allows registered nurses to earn more advanced degrees and transition into the role of Family Nurse Practitioner more efficiently.

If you’re passionate about diet, wellness, and preventive medicine, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can prepare you for careers in nutritional counseling, public health, and more.

Those interested in high-level management often pursue online mha programs. These programs are ideal for professionals who want to lead hospitals, healthcare systems, and community organizations.

Exploring these online degrees helps you stay flexible with your education and opens diverse career opportunities within the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Morgan Rouprêt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles