World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15242 14339 493 467 190 22531

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maité Garrouste-Orgeas between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maité Garrouste-Orgeas published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2017. 4 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2017. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 6
2003 7
2004 5
2005 5
2006 6
2007 9
2008 4
2009 4
2010 11
2011 5
2012 16
2013 10
2014 9
2015 12
2016 16
2017 17
2018 5
2019 12
2020 6
2021 4
2022 7
2023 5
2024 3
2025 1
Total 196
Download as CSV

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maité Garrouste-Orgeas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 190 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230 190
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maité Garrouste-Orgeas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maité Garrouste-Orgeas is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a specific focus on critical care and intensive care medicine. Their work spans a variety of subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, radiological and ultrasound technology, as well as public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The researcher's primary topics of work include family and patient care in intensive care units, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, nosocomial infections in ICU, grief, bereavement, and mental health, palliative care and end-of-life issues, respiratory support and mechanisms, and pneumonia and respiratory infections.

Publications by Maité Garrouste-Orgeas appear frequently in renowned journals such as Critical Care, Research Square, PLoS ONE, Intensive Care Medicine, and Annals of Intensive Care. The notable recent papers include:

  • Factors associated with acute mesenteric ischemia among critically ill ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc analysis of the NUTRIREA2 trial, 2022, Intensive Care Medicine
  • One-year survival in acute stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study, 2020, Annals of Intensive Care
  • Local signs at insertion site and catheter-related bloodstream infections: an observational post hoc analysis using individual data of four RCTs, 2020, Critical Care
  • Clinical and biological clusters of sepsis patients using hierarchical clustering, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Staff perceptions of family access and visitation policies in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: The WELCOME-ICU survey, 2021, Australian Critical Care

Frequent collaborators of Garrouste-Orgeas include Stéphane Ruckly, Jean-François Timsit, Michaël Darmon, Claire Dupuis, and Élie Azoulay. These coauthors have contributed to multiple joint publications, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Risk of Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms in Family Members of Intensive Care Unit Patients

    Elie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Nancy Kentish-Barnes;Sylvie Chevret

  • A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU.

    Alexandre Lautrette;Michael Darmon;Bruno Megarbane;Luc Marie Joly

  • Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Less Frequent Dressing Changes for Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Jean-François Timsit;Carole Schwebel;Lila Bouadma;Arnaud Geffroy

  • Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a reappraisal using causal analysis.

    Maarten Bekaert;Jean-Francois Timsit;Stijn Vansteelandt;Pieter Depuydt

  • Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2)

    Jean Reignier;Julie Boisramé-Helms;Laurent Brisard;Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou

  • Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study

    Alexis Tabah;Despoina Koulenti;Kevin Laupland;Benoit Misset

  • Oropharyngeal or Gastric Colonization and Nosocomial Pneumonia in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients A Prospective Study Based on Genomic DNA Analysis

    Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas;S. Chevret;G. Arlet;O. Marie

  • Outcome, functional autonomy, and quality of life of elderly patients with a long-term intensive care unit stay.

    Luc Montuclard;Maite Garrouste-Orgeas;Jean-François Timsit;Benoit Misset

  • Candida Colonization of the Respiratory Tract and Subsequent Pseudomonas Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

    Elie Azoulay;Jean-François Timsit;Muriel Tafflet;Arnaud de Lassence

  • Impact of an intensive care unit diary on psychological distress in patients and relatives

    Maité Garrouste-Orgeas;Isaline Coquet;Antoine Périer;Jean-François Timsit

  • Outcomes in severe sepsis and patients with septic shock: pathogen species and infection sites are not associated with mortality.

    Jean-Ralph Zahar;Jean-Francois Timsit;Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas;Adrien Français

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Chlorhexidine Dressing and Highly Adhesive Dressing for Preventing Catheter-related Infections in Critically Ill Adults

    Jean-François Timsit;Olivier Mimoz;Bruno Mourvillier;Bertrand Souweine

  • Excess Risk of Death from Intensive Care Unit—Acquired Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: A Reappraisal

    Maite Garrouste-Orgeas;Jean François Timsit;Muriel Tafflet;Benoit Misset

  • Overview of medical errors and adverse events

    Maité Garrouste-Orgeas;François Philippart;Cédric Bruel;Adeline Max

  • Family participation in care to the critically ill: opinions of families and staff.

    Élie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Sylvie Chevret;Charles Arich

  • Platelet Count Decline: An Early Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients With Prolonged ICU Stays

    Delphine Moreau;Jean-Fran¸ois Timsit;Aurélien Vesin;Maité Garrouste-Orgeas

  • Body mass index. An additional prognostic factor in ICU patients.

    Maité Garrouste-Orgeas;Gilles Troché;Elie Azoulay;Antoine Caubel

  • Should elderly patients be admitted to the intensive care unit

    Ariane Boumendil;Ariane Boumendil;Dominique Somme;Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas;Bertrand Guidet;Bertrand Guidet

  • Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study.

    Maité Garrouste-Orgeas;Luc Montuclard;Jean-François Timsit;Jean Reignier

  • Decision-making process, outcome, and 1-year quality of life of octogenarians referred for intensive care unit admission.

    Maité Garrouste-Orgeas;Jean-François Timsit;Luc Montuclard;Alain Colvez

Frequent Co-Authors

Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité
Jean-François Timsit
Jean-François Timsit Université Paris Cité
Michael Darmon
Michael Darmon Université Paris Cité
Jean Carlet
Jean Carlet St. Joseph Hospital
Bertrand Guidet
Bertrand Guidet Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Laurent Papazian
Laurent Papazian Aix-Marseille University
Sylvie Chevret
Sylvie Chevret Université Paris Cité
Benoît Schlemmer
Benoît Schlemmer Université Paris Cité
Corinne Alberti
Corinne Alberti Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Alain Cariou
Alain Cariou Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare careers and online degrees can offer alternative routes for those interested in working in medicine, without following the traditional path to an MD. Many students are considering accelerated programs, such as non nursing bachelor's to msn online options, which allow individuals with a bachelor's in a field other than nursing to earn a Master of Science in Nursing through flexible online study.

For those looking for a quicker entry into the healthcare workforce, there are also easy nursing programs to get into, many of which have streamlined admission requirements. Certain do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school programs even waive standardized entrance exams such as TEAS or HESI. This can make pursuing a nursing degree less daunting for some applicants.

Additionally, administrative healthcare roles such as medical billing and coding are accessible through accredited online programs. Many prospective students wonder, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? The good news is, many programs do offer financial aid, making this an attainable career path for those interested in working behind the scenes in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Maité Garrouste-Orgeas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles