World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benoît Schlemmer

Benoît Schlemmer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17071 16048 562 535 187 24457

Benoît Schlemmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benoît Schlemmer between 1980 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benoît Schlemmer published across 42 years, from 1980 to 2021, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2000. 4 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2000. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications
1980 2021

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benoît Schlemmer: publications per year, 1980 to 2021
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 3
1982 3
1983 4
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 4
1989 2
1990 3
1991 0
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 4
1997 3
1998 0
1999 7
2000 18
2001 14
2002 12
2003 12
2004 9
2005 8
2006 9
2007 12
2008 12
2009 11
2010 9
2011 15
2012 10
2013 8
2014 8
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
2018 3
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
Total 241
Download as CSV

Benoît Schlemmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoît Schlemmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 187 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230 187
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Benoît Schlemmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benoît Schlemmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benoît Schlemmer is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has contributed to various fields including Social Sciences, Immunology and Microbiology, and Medicine. Their work spans subfields such as Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Medicine, Pollution, and Infectious Diseases.

Their research focuses extensively on topics related to antibiotic use and resistance, as well as pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts. Key topics covered in their publications include:

  • Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies

Benoît Schlemmer has published in several scientific venues, notably:

  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
  • Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Benoît Schlemmer include:

  • "Trends in Antibiotic Consumption and Resistance in France Over 20 Years: Large and Continuous Efforts but Contrasting Results" (2020) published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • "Performance of Repeated Measures of (1-3)-β-D-Glucan, Mannan Antigen, and Antimannan Antibodies for the Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis in ICU Patients: A Preplanned Ancillary Analysis of the EMPIRICUS Randomized Clinical Trial" (2021) published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • "How to measure hospital antibiotic consumption: comparison of two methods from data surveillance in France" (2020) published in JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
  • "Quando a escola é uma opção - relação com a escola e relação com os saberes em Marrocos" (2024) published in Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Benoît Schlemmer include:

  • Lila Bouadma
  • Élie Azoulay
  • Jean-François Timsit
  • P Jarno
  • A Machut

Best Publications

  • Risk of Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms in Family Members of Intensive Care Unit Patients

    Elie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Nancy Kentish-Barnes;Sylvie Chevret

  • A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU.

    Alexandre Lautrette;Michael Darmon;Bruno Megarbane;Luc Marie Joly

  • Burnout syndrome in critical care nursing staff

    Marie Cécile Poncet;Philippe Toullic;Laurent Papazian;Nancy Kentish-Barnes

  • Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: Ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity

    F Pochard;E Azoulay;S Chevret;F Lemaire

  • Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.

    E Azoulay;S Chevret;G Leleu;F Pochard

  • Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Prospective Multicenter Data From France and Belgium—A Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique Study

    Elie Azoulay;Djamel Mokart;Frédéric Pène;Jérôme Lambert

  • Prevalence and Factors of Intensive Care Unit Conflicts The Conflicus Study

    Élie Azoulay;Jean-François Timsit;Charles L. Sprung;Marcio Soares

  • Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study.

    Frédéric Pochard;Michaël Darmon;Thomas Fassier;Pierre-Edouard Bollaert

  • Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study.

    Elie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Sylvie Chevret;François Lemaire

  • Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

    Elie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Sylvie Chevret;Mercé Jourdain

  • The ICU trial: a new admission policy for cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

    Lucien Lecuyer;Sylvie Chevret;Guillaume Thiery;Michael Darmon

  • Oropharyngeal or Gastric Colonization and Nosocomial Pneumonia in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients A Prospective Study Based on Genomic DNA Analysis

    Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas;S. Chevret;G. Arlet;O. Marie

  • Outcome of Cancer Patients Considered for Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Hospital-Wide Prospective Study

    Guillaume Thiéry;Élie Azoulay;Michael Darmon;Magali Ciroldi

  • Prognostic value of anti-ADAMTS13 antibody features (Ig isotype, titer, and inhibitory effect) in a cohort of 35 adult French patients undergoing a first episode of thrombotic microangiopathy with undetectable ADAMTS13 activity

    Silvia Ferrari;Friedrich Scheiflinger;Manfred Rieger;Geert Mudde

  • Complicated grief after death of a relative in the intensive care unit

    Nancy Kentish-Barnes;Marine Chaize;Valérie Seegers;Stéphane Legriel

  • Platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist BN 52021 in the treatment of severe sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. BN 52021 Sepsis Study Group.

    Jean-Francois A. Dhainaut;Alain Tenaillon;Yves Le Tulzo;Benoit Schlemmer

  • The prognosis of acute respiratory failure in critically ill cancer patients.

    Élie Azoulay;Guillaume Thiéry;Sylvie Chevret;Delphine Moreau

  • Candida Colonization of the Respiratory Tract and Subsequent Pseudomonas Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

    Elie Azoulay;Jean-François Timsit;Muriel Tafflet;Arnaud de Lassence

  • Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units.

    Élie Azoulay;Frédéric Pochard;Sylvie Chevret;Christophe Adrie

  • Improved survival of critically ill cancer patients with septic shock

    Jérôme Larché;Élie Azoulay;Fabienne Fieux;Laurent Mesnard

Frequent Co-Authors

Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité
Sylvie Chevret
Sylvie Chevret Université Paris Cité
Michael Darmon
Michael Darmon Université Paris Cité
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Maité Garrouste-Orgeas Université Paris Cité
Lionel Galicier
Lionel Galicier Université Paris Cité
Christian Brun-Buisson
Christian Brun-Buisson Institut Pasteur
Laurent Papazian
Laurent Papazian Aix-Marseille University
Jean-Louis Teboul
Jean-Louis Teboul University of Paris-Saclay
Alain Cariou
Alain Cariou Université Paris Cité
Bruno Mégarbane
Bruno Mégarbane Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to traditional M.D. programs. There are several online degrees that open up rewarding healthcare roles, often with more flexible schedules and lower costs. One popular entry point is becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). If you’re looking for what is the fastest way to become an lpn, online fast-track LPN programs can help you start working in healthcare quickly.

For those aiming to specialize, advanced practice roles like Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners (PMHNP) are in high demand. Accelerated online options such as accelerated msn psychiatric np programs can fast-track your career while offering the convenience of remote study.

Not all healthcare roles involve direct patient care. Management positions are key to efficient operations. Earning an online health management degree can open doors to supervisory roles. If cost is a concern, many schools offer the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration to help you advance your career affordably.

Whether you’re just starting or looking to move up, these online career pathways offer flexible, affordable options in the growing healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Benoît Schlemmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles