World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
14657
World Ranking
2905
National Ranking
280

Colin T. Dourish publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin T. Dourish sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 299 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Colin T. Dourish D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin T. Dourish sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Behavioural and pharmacological characterisation of the elevated "zero-maze" as an animal model of anxiety.

    Jon K. Shepherd;Savraj S. Grewal;Allan Fletcher;David J. Bill

  • Electrophysiological, biochemical, neurohormonal and behavioural studies with WAY-100635, a potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist.

    Allan Fletcher;Elaine A. Forster;David J. Bill;Geraldine Brown

  • Low doses of the putative serotonin agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) elicit feeding in the rat.

    C. T. Dourish;P. H. Hutson;G. Curzon

  • Reduced satiating effect of d-fenfluramine in serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptor mutant mice.

    Steven P. Vickers;Peter G. Clifton;Colin T. Dourish;Laurence H. Tecott

  • The role of CCK caerulein, and CCK antagonists in nociception.

    Nigel Scott Baber;Colin Trevor Dourish;David Robert Hill

  • The selective CCK-B receptor antagonist L-365,260 enhances morphine analgesia and prevents morphine tolerance in the rat.

    C.T. Dourish;M.F. O'Neill;J. Coughlan;S.J. Kitchener

  • Preferential effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, on food intake and body weight gain of obese (fa/fa) compared to lean Zucker rats.

    S. P. Vickers;L. J. Webster;A. Wyatt;C. T. Dourish

  • Postponement of satiety by blockade of brain cholecystokinin (CCK-B) receptors.

    CT Dourish;W Rycroft;SD Iversen

  • Silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonists: utility as research tools and therapeutic agents

    Allan Fletcher;Ian A. Cliffe;Colin T. Dourish

  • Antidepressant-like action of 5-HT1A agonists and conventional antidepressants in an animal model of depression.

    G.A. Kennett;C.T. Dourish;G. Curzon

  • Evidence that hypophagia induced by d-fenfluramine and d-norfenfluramine in the rat is mediated by 5-HT2C receptors.

    Steven P Vickers;Colin T Dourish;Guy A Kennett

  • Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Amantadine Hydrochloride in the Treatment of Children With Autistic Disorder

    Bryan H. King;D. Mark Wright;Benjamin L. Handen;Linmarie Sikich

  • Neurochemical and behavioural evidence for mediation of the hyperphagic action of 8-OH-DPAT by 5-HT cell body autoreceptors.

    P.H. Hutson;C.T. Dourish;G. Curzon

  • Utility of ethological analysis to overcome locomotor confounds in elevated maze models of anxiety

    S.M Weiss;G Wadsworth;A Fletcher;C.T Dourish

  • Enhancement of morphine analgesia and prevention of morphine tolerance in the rat by the cholecystokinin antagonist L-364,718

    Colin T. Dourish;Diane Hawley;Susan D. Iversen

  • 5-HT1B agonists induce anorexia at a postsynaptic site.

    G.A. Kennett;C.T. Dourish;G. Curzon

  • Cholecystokinin and anxiety

    S. Ravard;C.T. Dourish

  • Characteristics of feeding induced by the serotonin agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT).

    C.T. Dourish;P.H. Hutson;G. Curzon

  • 8-OH-DPAT-induced hyperphagia: Its neural basis and possible therapeutic relevance

    C.T. Dourish;P.H. Hutson;G.A. Kennett;G. Curzon

  • Single administration of 5-HT1A agonists decreases 5-HT1A presynaptic, but not postsynaptic receptor-mediated responses: relationship to antidepressant-like action.

    G.A. Kennett;M. Marcou;C.T. Dourish;G. Curzon

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne Higgs
Suzanne Higgs University of Birmingham
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Guy M. Goodwin
Guy M. Goodwin University of Oxford
Michael Browning
Michael Browning University of Oxford
Pia Rotshtein
Pia Rotshtein University of Birmingham
Robert M. Pratt
Robert M. Pratt National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
David J. Nutt
David J. Nutt Imperial College London
Alan A. Boulton
Alan A. Boulton University of Saskatchewan
Ulrich Ettinger
Ulrich Ettinger University of Bonn
Emma Barkus
Emma Barkus Northumbria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in neuroscience opens the door to a range of online education options and promising career pathways. Many students explore accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited programs to fast-track their education without compromising on quality. These programs are flexible and ideal for those looking to enter the workforce or graduate school more quickly.

Neuroscience and related science majors are often featured among the 4 year degrees that pay well. Graduates find opportunities in healthcare, research, pharmaceuticals, and technology—fields known for competitive salaries and strong job growth.

Students aiming for financial security should also look into the best degrees to make money. Majors intersecting biology, chemistry, and technology often top these lists, providing solid return on investment.

Cost is a key consideration for many. Fortunately, there are online colleges that offer financial aid, allowing more students to access quality neuroscience programs without the burden of excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Colin T. Dourish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles