World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
15965
World Ranking
2089
National Ranking
234

R.J. Rodgers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.J. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

R.J. Rodgers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.J. Rodgers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

R.J. Rodgers is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Urology.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Hair Growth and Disorders

Rodgers has authored papers published in reputable venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Exercise and insulin resistance in PCOS: muscle insulin signalling and fibrosis," published in 2020 in Endocrine Connections
  • "203. Lock and Load: A Case Series Looking at Safety and Tolerability of a Forgotten Lithium Loading Protocol," published in 2025 in the Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rodgers are:

  • Nigel K. Stepto
  • Danielle Hiam
  • Melanie Gibson-Helm
  • Steven Cassar
  • Cheryce L. Harrison

The venues where Rodgers commonly publishes their work include:

  • Endocrine Connections
  • Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Anxiety, defence and the elevated plus-maze.

    R.J. Rodgers;A. Dalvi

  • Factor analysis of spatiotemporal and ethological measures in the murine elevated plus-maze test of anxiety

    R.J. Rodgers;N.J.T. Johnson

  • Animal models of anxiety: an ethological perspective

    R.J. Rodgers;B.-J. Cao;A. Dalvi;A. Holmes

  • Animal models of 'anxiety': where next?

    R J Rodgers

  • Defense system psychopharmacology: an ethological approach to the pharmacology of fear and anxiety.

    R J Blanchard;E B Yudko;R J Rodgers;D C Blanchard;D C Blanchard

  • Influence of social isolation, gender, strain, and prior novelty on plus-maze behaviour in mice.

    R.J. Rodgers;J.C. Cole

  • Physiology: does gut hormone PYY3-36 decrease food intake in rodents?

    Tschöp M;Castañeda Tr;Joost Hg;Thöne-Reineke C

  • Corticosterone response to the plus-maze: High correlation with risk assessment in rats and mice

    R J Rodgers;J Haller;A Holmes;J Halasz

  • SB-334867, a selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist, enhances behavioural satiety and blocks the hyperphagic effect of orexin-A in rats

    R. J. Rodgers;J. C. G. Halford;R. L. Nunes de Souza;A. L. Canto de Souza

  • Influence of prior maze experience on behaviour and response to diazepam in the elevated plus-maze and light/dark tests of anxiety in mice

    R. J. Rodgers;J. K. Shepherd

  • Anxiety enhancement in the murine elevated plus maze by immediate prior exposure to social stressors.

    R.J. Rodgers;J.C. Cole

  • Risk Assessment and Animal Models of Anxiety

    D. C. Blanchard;R. J. Blanchard;R. J. Rodgers

  • Ethopharmacological analysis of the effects of putative 'anxiogenic' agents in the mouse elevated plus-maze.

    R.J. Rodgers;J.C. Cole;K. Aboualfa;L.H. Stephenson

  • Orexins and appetite regulation.

    R.J. Rodgers;Y. Ishii;J.C.G. Halford;J.E. Blundell

  • Behavioral profile of wild mice in the elevated plus-maze test for anxiety.

    A Holmes;S Parmigiani;P.F Ferrari;P Palanza

  • GABAergic influences on plus-maze behaviour in mice.

    A. Dalvi;R. J. Rodgers

  • Responses of Swiss–Webster Mice to Repeated Plus-Maze Experience: Further Evidence for a Qualitative Shift in Emotional State?

    A Holmes;R J Rodgers

  • Effects of diazepam on behavioural and antinociceptive responses to the elevated plus-maze in male mice depend upon treatment regimen and prior maze experience

    R. J. Rodgers;C. Lee;J. K. Shepherd

  • Diazepam changes risk assessment in an anxiety/defense test battery.

    D C Blanchard;R J Blanchard;P Tom;R J Rodgers

  • Behaviorally selective effects of neuroactive steroids on plus-maze anxiety in mice.

    R.J Rodgers;N.J.T Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Blundell
John E. Blundell University of Leeds
Robert J. Blanchard
Robert J. Blanchard University of Hawaii at Manoa
Stefano Parmigiani
Stefano Parmigiani University of Parma
Pier Francesco Ferrari
Pier Francesco Ferrari Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Paola Palanza
Paola Palanza University of Parma
Neil Upton
Neil Upton Transpharmation, UK
Stephen C. Benoit
Stephen C. Benoit University of Cincinnati
Annette G. Beck-Sickinger
Annette G. Beck-Sickinger Leipzig University
David B. Allison
David B. Allison Indiana University
Randy J. Seeley
Randy J. Seeley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to multiple rewarding career pathways. Many students choose to pursue a counseling or therapy license, but requirements vary by state. For instance, the licensed therapist requirements in Portland include earning a graduate degree, completing clinical hours, and passing specific examinations.

The process is similar, yet distinct, elsewhere. If you are curious about how to become a licensed therapist in Raleigh, you’ll find that local regulations influence the type of supervised practice and coursework needed. Those aiming to practice in Nevada can learn more about becoming a licensed therapist in Reno by researching Nevada’s specific licensure steps and required qualifications.

Similarly, understanding Richmond licensed therapist education requirements will help you plan your academic and professional journey accordingly. Regardless of location, online degrees can provide the necessary foundation and flexibility for aspiring counselors to meet these evolving demands and begin a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing R.J. Rodgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles