World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 56 4460 4095 2019 1823 187 15049

Michael T. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael T. Williams between 1974 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael T. Williams published across 53 years, from 1974 to 2026, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2010. 12 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2010. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1974 2026

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael T. Williams: publications per year, 1974 to 2026
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 1
2002 3
2003 5
2004 8
2005 5
2006 9
2007 10
2008 10
2009 7
2010 12
2011 11
2012 12
2013 5
2014 7
2015 7
2016 6
2017 10
2018 5
2019 12
2020 7
2021 12
2022 5
2023 5
2024 4
2025 11
2026 1
Total 205
Download as CSV

Michael T. Williams publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 187 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 187
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael T. Williams D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 56
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael T. Williams is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, molecular biology, and behavioral neuroscience.

Their work covers key topics such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress responses and cortisol, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, memory and neural mechanisms, pesticide exposure and toxicity, as well as radiation therapy and dosimetry.

Williams has published numerous papers in frequent venues including:

  • Neurotoxicology and Teratology
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Genes Brain & Behavior
  • Current Research in Toxicology

Representative recent papers include:

  • Review of rodent models of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Effects of pyrethroids on brain development and behavior: Deltamethrin, 2021, Neurotoxicology and Teratology
  • Chronic psychosocial stress during pregnancy affects maternal behavior and neuroendocrine function and modulates hypothalamic CRH and nuclear steroid receptor expression, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Translating Neurobehavioral Toxicity Across Species From Zebrafish to Rats to Humans: Implications for Risk Assessment, 2021, Frontiers in Toxicology
  • The potassium channel Kv4.2 regulates dendritic spine morphology, electroencephalographic characteristics and seizure susceptibility in mice, 2020, Experimental Neurology

Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authors such as:

  • Charles V. Vorhees
  • Samantha L. Regan
  • Chiho Sugimoto
  • Adam L. Fritz
  • Emily M. Pitzer

Throughout their career, Williams has contributed to advancing knowledge on neurobehavioral toxicity, neuropharmacology, and behavioral effects influenced by environmental factors. Their research integrates multidisciplinary approaches to understand the neural mechanisms underlying behavior and disorders.

Best Publications

  • Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory

    Charles V Vorhees;Michael T Williams

  • Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents.

    Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Plasma Cortisol Levels of Dogs at a County Animal Shelter

    Michael B Hennessy;Harry N Davis;Michael T Williams;Carolyn Mellott

  • Influence of male and female petters on plasma cortisol and behaviour: can human interaction reduce the stress of dogs in a public animal shelter?

    Michael B Hennessy;Michael T. Williams;Deborah D Miller;Chet W Douglas

  • Hypoxia-Ischemia Induces DNA Synthesis without Cell Proliferation in Dying Neurons in Adult Rodent Brain

    Chia Yi Kuan;Aryn J. Schloemer;Aigang Lu;Aigang Lu;Kevin A. Burns

  • Deficiency in Na,K-ATPase α Isoform Genes Alters Spatial Learning, Motor Activity, and Anxiety in Mice

    Amy E. Moseley;Michael T. Williams;Tori L. Schaefer;Cynthia S. Bohanan

  • The effects of neonatal isoflurane exposure in mice on brain cell viability, adult behavior, learning, and memory.

    Andreas W. Loepke;George K. Istaphanous;John J. Mcauliffe;Lili Miles

  • Comparison of the elevated plus and elevated zero mazes in treated and untreated male Sprague-Dawley rats: effects of anxiolytic and anxiogenic agents.

    Amanda A. Braun;Matthew R. Skelton;Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Neuronopathic Gaucher disease in the mouse: viable combined selective saposin C deficiency and mutant glucocerebrosidase (V394L) mice with glucosylsphingosine and glucosylceramide accumulation and progressive neurological deficits

    Ying Ying Sun;Benjamin Liou;Huimin Ran;Matthew R. Skelton

  • Impaired spatial and sequential learning in rats treated neonatally with D-fenfluramine.

    L. L. Morford;S. L. Inman-Wood;G. A. Gudelsky;M. T. Williams

  • Value of water mazes for assessing spatial and egocentric learning and memory in rodent basic research and regulatory studies.

    Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Creatine Transporter (CrT; Slc6a8) Knockout Mice as a Model of Human CrT Deficiency

    Matthew R. Skelton;Tori L. Schaefer;Devon L. Graham;Ton J. deGrauw

  • Na,K-ATPase and the role of α isoforms in behavior

    Jerry B. Lingrel;Jerry B. Lingrel;Michael T. Williams;Michael T. Williams;Charles V. Vorhees;Charles V. Vorhees;Amy E. Moseley;Amy E. Moseley

  • Protein phosphorylation in nervous tissue: possible involvement in nervous tissue function and relationship to cyclic nucleotide metabolism

    Michael Williams;Richard Rodnight

  • Refining the critical period for methamphetamine-induced spatial deficits in the Morris water maze

    Michael T. Williams;Mary S. Moran;Charles V. Vorhees

  • Abnormal neurodevelopment, neurosignaling and behaviour in Npas3-deficient mice

    Eric W. Brunskill;Lisa A. Ehrman;Michael T. Williams;Justin Klanke

  • Developmental D‐methamphetamine treatment selectively induces spatial navigation impairments in reference memory in the Morris water maze while sparing working memory

    Michael T. Williams;Laronda L. Morford;Sandra L. Wood;Tanya L. Wallace

  • Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.

    Nicole R. Herring;Tori L. Schaefer;Gary A. Gudelsky;Charles V. Vorhees

  • 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in adult rats produces deficits in path integration and spatial reference memory.

    Jessica A. Able;Gary A. Gudelsky;Gary A. Gudelsky;Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Long-term effects of neonatal methamphetamine exposure in rats on spatial learning in the Barnes maze and on cliff avoidance, corticosterone release,and neurotoxicity in adulthood

    Michael T Williams;Tracy L Blankenmeyer;Tori L Schaefer;Carrie A Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles V. Vorhees
Charles V. Vorhees University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Gary A. Gudelsky
Gary A. Gudelsky University of Cincinnati
Kim B. Seroogy
Kim B. Seroogy University of Cincinnati
David P. Witte
David P. Witte Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Michael W. Decker
Michael W. Decker Abbott (United Kingdom)
Michael B. Hennessy
Michael B. Hennessy Wright State University
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Daniel W. Nebert
Daniel W. Nebert University of Cincinnati
Jerry B. Lingrel
Jerry B. Lingrel University of Cincinnati
Neil M. Richtand
Neil M. Richtand University of California - San Diego School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to some of the highest paying jobs in healthcare, research, and technology. Understanding the potential career outcomes helps students make informed decisions about their study focus and long-term goals.

Many US universities now offer online neuroscience degrees, making advanced education more accessible. If affordability is a concern, consider online colleges that accept financial aid. These institutions let you earn a degree without the financial burden often associated with traditional programs.

In addition to degrees, students and working professionals can enhance their skills with online certifications that pay well. Certifications in data analysis, computer science, or medical coding can broaden your job opportunities in neuroscience-related fields.

Some students might search for easy bachelor degrees online as a stepping stone toward building their career. While neuroscience can be challenging, combining it with other flexible study options can help you meet your education and career goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles