World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
15049
World Ranking
4460
National Ranking
2019

Michael T. Williams publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 187 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael T. Williams D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael T. Williams is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, molecular biology, and behavioral neuroscience.

Their work covers key topics such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress responses and cortisol, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, memory and neural mechanisms, pesticide exposure and toxicity, as well as radiation therapy and dosimetry.

Williams has published numerous papers in frequent venues including:

  • Neurotoxicology and Teratology
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Genes Brain & Behavior
  • Current Research in Toxicology

Representative recent papers include:

  • Review of rodent models of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Effects of pyrethroids on brain development and behavior: Deltamethrin, 2021, Neurotoxicology and Teratology
  • Chronic psychosocial stress during pregnancy affects maternal behavior and neuroendocrine function and modulates hypothalamic CRH and nuclear steroid receptor expression, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Translating Neurobehavioral Toxicity Across Species From Zebrafish to Rats to Humans: Implications for Risk Assessment, 2021, Frontiers in Toxicology
  • The potassium channel Kv4.2 regulates dendritic spine morphology, electroencephalographic characteristics and seizure susceptibility in mice, 2020, Experimental Neurology

Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authors such as:

  • Charles V. Vorhees
  • Samantha L. Regan
  • Chiho Sugimoto
  • Adam L. Fritz
  • Emily M. Pitzer

Throughout their career, Williams has contributed to advancing knowledge on neurobehavioral toxicity, neuropharmacology, and behavioral effects influenced by environmental factors. Their research integrates multidisciplinary approaches to understand the neural mechanisms underlying behavior and disorders.

Best Publications

  • Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory

    Charles V Vorhees;Michael T Williams

  • Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents.

    Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Plasma Cortisol Levels of Dogs at a County Animal Shelter

    Michael B Hennessy;Harry N Davis;Michael T Williams;Carolyn Mellott

  • Influence of male and female petters on plasma cortisol and behaviour: can human interaction reduce the stress of dogs in a public animal shelter?

    Michael B Hennessy;Michael T. Williams;Deborah D Miller;Chet W Douglas

  • Hypoxia-Ischemia Induces DNA Synthesis without Cell Proliferation in Dying Neurons in Adult Rodent Brain

    Chia Yi Kuan;Aryn J. Schloemer;Aigang Lu;Aigang Lu;Kevin A. Burns

  • Deficiency in Na,K-ATPase α Isoform Genes Alters Spatial Learning, Motor Activity, and Anxiety in Mice

    Amy E. Moseley;Michael T. Williams;Tori L. Schaefer;Cynthia S. Bohanan

  • The effects of neonatal isoflurane exposure in mice on brain cell viability, adult behavior, learning, and memory.

    Andreas W. Loepke;George K. Istaphanous;John J. Mcauliffe;Lili Miles

  • Comparison of the elevated plus and elevated zero mazes in treated and untreated male Sprague-Dawley rats: effects of anxiolytic and anxiogenic agents.

    Amanda A. Braun;Matthew R. Skelton;Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Neuronopathic Gaucher disease in the mouse: viable combined selective saposin C deficiency and mutant glucocerebrosidase (V394L) mice with glucosylsphingosine and glucosylceramide accumulation and progressive neurological deficits

    Ying Ying Sun;Benjamin Liou;Huimin Ran;Matthew R. Skelton

  • Impaired spatial and sequential learning in rats treated neonatally with D-fenfluramine.

    L. L. Morford;S. L. Inman-Wood;G. A. Gudelsky;M. T. Williams

  • Value of water mazes for assessing spatial and egocentric learning and memory in rodent basic research and regulatory studies.

    Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Creatine Transporter (CrT; Slc6a8) Knockout Mice as a Model of Human CrT Deficiency

    Matthew R. Skelton;Tori L. Schaefer;Devon L. Graham;Ton J. deGrauw

  • Na,K-ATPase and the role of α isoforms in behavior

    Jerry B. Lingrel;Jerry B. Lingrel;Michael T. Williams;Michael T. Williams;Charles V. Vorhees;Charles V. Vorhees;Amy E. Moseley;Amy E. Moseley

  • Protein phosphorylation in nervous tissue: possible involvement in nervous tissue function and relationship to cyclic nucleotide metabolism

    Michael Williams;Richard Rodnight

  • Refining the critical period for methamphetamine-induced spatial deficits in the Morris water maze

    Michael T. Williams;Mary S. Moran;Charles V. Vorhees

  • Abnormal neurodevelopment, neurosignaling and behaviour in Npas3-deficient mice

    Eric W. Brunskill;Lisa A. Ehrman;Michael T. Williams;Justin Klanke

  • Developmental D‐methamphetamine treatment selectively induces spatial navigation impairments in reference memory in the Morris water maze while sparing working memory

    Michael T. Williams;Laronda L. Morford;Sandra L. Wood;Tanya L. Wallace

  • Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.

    Nicole R. Herring;Tori L. Schaefer;Gary A. Gudelsky;Charles V. Vorhees

  • 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine in adult rats produces deficits in path integration and spatial reference memory.

    Jessica A. Able;Gary A. Gudelsky;Gary A. Gudelsky;Charles V. Vorhees;Michael T. Williams

  • Long-term effects of neonatal methamphetamine exposure in rats on spatial learning in the Barnes maze and on cliff avoidance, corticosterone release,and neurotoxicity in adulthood

    Michael T Williams;Tracy L Blankenmeyer;Tori L Schaefer;Carrie A Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles V. Vorhees
Charles V. Vorhees University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Gary A. Gudelsky
Gary A. Gudelsky University of Cincinnati
Kim B. Seroogy
Kim B. Seroogy University of Cincinnati
David P. Witte
David P. Witte Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Michael W. Decker
Michael W. Decker Abbott (United Kingdom)
Michael B. Hennessy
Michael B. Hennessy Wright State University
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Daniel W. Nebert
Daniel W. Nebert University of Cincinnati
Jerry B. Lingrel
Jerry B. Lingrel University of Cincinnati
Neil M. Richtand
Neil M. Richtand University of California - San Diego School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to some of the highest paying jobs in healthcare, research, and technology. Understanding the potential career outcomes helps students make informed decisions about their study focus and long-term goals.

Many US universities now offer online neuroscience degrees, making advanced education more accessible. If affordability is a concern, consider online colleges that accept financial aid. These institutions let you earn a degree without the financial burden often associated with traditional programs.

In addition to degrees, students and working professionals can enhance their skills with online certifications that pay well. Certifications in data analysis, computer science, or medical coding can broaden your job opportunities in neuroscience-related fields.

Some students might search for easy bachelor degrees online as a stepping stone toward building their career. While neuroscience can be challenging, combining it with other flexible study options can help you meet your education and career goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles