World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 99 8474 7963 827 790 1033 44882

Mark Emberton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Emberton between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Emberton published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 29.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 71 publications in 2021. 20 of the 1,067 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 71. Peak 71 publications in 2021. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 44 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 46 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 50 publications 2012: 52 publications 2013: 59 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 54 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 59 publications 2021: 71 publications 2022: 34 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

1,067 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Emberton: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 5
1993 4
1994 1
1995 7
1996 4
1997 6
1998 5
1999 5
2000 5
2001 9
2002 10
2003 20
2004 44
2005 28
2006 46
2007 43
2008 31
2009 36
2010 43
2011 50
2012 52
2013 59
2014 50
2015 51
2016 40
2017 55
2018 54
2019 61
2020 59
2021 71
2022 34
2023 41
2024 16
2025 19
2026 1
Total 1,067
Download as CSV

Mark Emberton publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Emberton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,021–1,040 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,033 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70 1,033
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Emberton D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Emberton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 99
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Mark Emberton is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rheumatology, Surgery, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Urologic and Reproductive Health Conditions
  • MRI in Cancer Diagnosis
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Mark Emberton has contributed to several frequent publication venues, highlighting a focus on urology and oncological imaging. These venues include:

  • European Urology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • British Journal of Urology
  • European Urology Open Science
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent co-authors reflect a collaborative network centered on urological cancer research and imaging:

  • Caroline M. Moore
  • Alex Freeman
  • Shonit Punwani
  • Hashim U. Ahmed
  • Francesco Giganti

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Emberton include:

  • "Early detection of cancer," 2022, Science
  • "Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial," 2020, European Urology Oncology
  • "Five-year Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Large Cohort Study," 2020, European Urology
  • "Cancer Control Outcomes Following Focal Therapy Using High-intensity Focused Ultrasound in 1379 Men with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institute 15-year Experience," 2022, European Urology
  • "TREXIT 2020": why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now," 2020, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Mark Emberton has received recognition as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study

    Hashim U Ahmed;Hashim U Ahmed;Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily;Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily;Louise C. Brown;Rhian Gabe

  • MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

    Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Antti S. Rannikko;Marcelo Borghi;Valeria Panebianco

  • EAU Guidelines on the Treatment and Follow-up of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Including Benign Prostatic Obstruction

    Matthias Oelke;Alexander Bachmann;Aurélien Descazeaud;Mark Emberton

  • Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.

    Stacy Loeb;Annelies Vellekoop;Hashim U. Ahmed;James Catto

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting

    Louise Dickinson;Louise Dickinson;Louise Dickinson;Hashim U. Ahmed;Hashim U. Ahmed;Clare Allen;Jelle O. Barentsz

  • Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Jurgen J. Fütterer;Alberto Briganti;Pieter De Visschere;Mark Emberton

  • EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines).

    Stephan Madersbacher;Gerasimos Alivizatos;Jorgen Nordling;Carlos Rioja Sanz

  • Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review.

    Caroline M. Moore;Caroline M. Moore;Nicola L. Robertson;Nasr Arsanious;Thomas Middleton

  • Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Ian Donaldson;Mark Emberton;Mark Emberton;Behfar Ehdaie

  • How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate

    Alexander P.S. Kirkham;Mark Emberton;Clare Allen

  • Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group.

    Caroline M. Moore;Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Scott Eggener;Mark Emberton

  • Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration.

    Yipeng Hu;Yipeng Hu;Marc Modat;Eli Gibson;Wenqi Li

  • Focal therapy for localised unifocal and multifocal prostate cancer: a prospective development study

    Hashim U Ahmed;Hashim U Ahmed;Richard G Hindley;Louise Dickinson;Louise Dickinson;Alex Freeman

  • Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy

    Hashim U. Ahmed;Alex Kirkham;Manit Arya;Rowland Illing

  • The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Hashim U Ahmed;Mark Emberton;Nathan L Lawrentschuk

  • Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer—a review of current status and future promise

    Caroline M Moore;Doug Pendse;Mark Emberton

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia: A progressive disease of aging men

    Mark Emberton;Gerald L Andriole;Jean de la Rosette;Bob Djavan

  • Padeliporfin vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy versus active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer (CLIN1001 PCM301): an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial

    Abdel Rahmène Azzouzi;Sébastien Vincendeau;Eric Barret;Antony Cicco

  • Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy

    Hashim Uddin Ahmed;Yipeng Hu;Tim Carter;Nimalan Arumainayagam

  • New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Yannick Cerantola;Scott E. Eggener;Herbert Lepor

Frequent Co-Authors

Hashim U. Ahmed
Hashim U. Ahmed Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Jan van der Meulen
Jan van der Meulen University of London
Dean C. Barratt
Dean C. Barratt University College London
David J. Hawkes
David J. Hawkes University College London
Chris Parker
Chris Parker Institute of Cancer Research
Arnauld Villers
Arnauld Villers University of Lille
Laurence Klotz
Laurence Klotz University of Toronto
Samir S. Taneja
Samir S. Taneja New York University
Susan A. Charman
Susan A. Charman Monash University
David Atkinson
David Atkinson University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t have to follow a single path. Many students interested in healthcare may find alternative or supplementary degrees and career pathways that suit their goals or lifestyle. For those who are already registered nurses and want to advance, consider earning an rn to bsn online without clinicals—an option that provides flexibility and removes the requirement of in-person clinical experience.

If you aspire to reach the highest practice levels, pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a popular route. Many professionals seek the fastest dnp program to quickly advance their careers, while others look for more affordable dnp programs that make higher education more attainable without compromising quality.

Another viable entry point into healthcare is becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Those eager to join the workforce sooner may be interested in a fast lpn program, which enables students to start their careers quickly through accelerated online coursework.

With these diverse online offerings, students can find a program that matches both their career ambitions and lifestyle needs, from entry-level nursing to advanced clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Emberton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles