World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jelle O. Barentsz

Jelle O. Barentsz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
48133
World Ranking
6185
National Ranking
238

Jelle O. Barentsz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelle O. Barentsz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jelle O. Barentsz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jelle O. Barentsz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jelle O. Barentsz is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, particularly focusing on prostate cancer. Their work mainly spans across Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rheumatology, Surgery, and Oncology.

The primary areas of research for Jelle O. Barentsz include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

The scientist's output includes numerous publications featured prominently in key venues such as:

  • European Urology
  • European Radiology
  • European Urology Oncology
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Radiology

Among recent influential papers authored or co-authored by Jelle O. Barentsz are:

  • "Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel" (2020, Radiology)
  • "ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training" (2020, European Radiology)
  • "Artificial intelligence and radiologists in prostate cancer detection on MRI (PI-CAI): an international, paired, non-inferiority, confirmatory study" (2024, The Lancet Oncology)
  • "Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR): International Consensus-based Guidelines on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy" (2021, European Urology Oncology)
  • "Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review" (2020, European Urology Oncology)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Ivo G. Schoots
  • Bas Israël
  • Anwar R. Padhani
  • J.P. Michiel Sedelaar
  • Maarten de Rooij

Best Publications

  • PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2

    Jeffrey C. Weinreb;Jelle O. Barentsz;Peter L. Choyke;Francois Cornud

  • ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012

    Jelle O Barentsz;Jonathan Richenberg;Richard Clements;Peter L. Choyke

  • Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer.

    Mukesh G. Harisinghani;Jelle Barentsz;Peter F. Hahn;Willem M. Deserno

  • Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

    Baris Turkbey;Andrew B. Rosenkrantz;Masoom A. Haider;Anwar R. Padhani

  • The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

    A.M. Hovels;R.A.M. Heesakkers;E.M.M. Adang;G.J. Jager

  • Magnetic resonance tracking of dendritic cells in melanoma patients for monitoring of cellular therapy

    I Jolanda M de Vries;W Joost Lesterhuis;Jelle O Barentsz;Pauline Verdijk

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection, Localisation, and Characterisation of Prostate Cancer: Recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting

    Louise Dickinson;Louise Dickinson;Louise Dickinson;Hashim U. Ahmed;Hashim U. Ahmed;Clare Allen;Jelle O. Barentsz

  • Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging

    Caroline M A Hoeks;Jelle O Barentsz;Thomas Hambrock;Derya Yakar

  • Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

    Marloes van der Leest;Erik Cornel;Bas Israël;Rianne Hendriks

  • Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

    C. Boetes;R. D. M. Mus;R. Holland;J. O. Barentsz

  • Relationship between Apparent Diffusion Coefficients at 3.0-T MR Imaging and Gleason Grade in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer

    Thomas Hambrock;Diederik M. Somford;Henkjan J. Huisman;Inge M. van Oort

  • Prostate Cancer Localization with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging

    Jurgen J. Fütterer;Stijn W. T. P. J. Heijmink;Tom W. J. Scheenen;Jeroen Veltman

  • Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound–Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies

    Morgan R. Pokorny;Maarten de Rooij;Earl Duncan;Fritz H. Schröder

  • Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis

    Maarten de Rooij;Esther H.J. Hamoen;J. Alfred Witjes;Jelle O. Barentsz

  • Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use

    Jelle O. Barentsz;Jeffrey C. Weinreb;Sadhna Verma;Harriet C. Thoeny

  • Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis.

    Maarten de Rooij;Esther H. J. Hamoen;Jurgen J. Fütterer;Jelle O. Barentsz

  • MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.

    C. Boetes;J. O. Barentsz;R. D. Mus;R. F. Van Der Sluis

  • Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI

    Geert Litjens;Oscar Debats;Jelle Barentsz;Nico Karssemeijer

  • Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System).

    Valeria Panebianco;Yoshifumi Narumi;Ersan Altun;Bernard H. Bochner

  • Discrimination of Prostate Cancer from Normal Peripheral Zone and Central Gland Tissue by Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

    Marc R. Engelbrecht;Henkjan J. Huisman;Robert J. F. Laheij;Gerrit J. Jager

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Alfred Witjes
J. Alfred Witjes Radboud University
Arend Heerschap
Arend Heerschap Radboud University
Anwar R. Padhani
Anwar R. Padhani Northwood University
Geert Litjens
Geert Litjens Radboud University
Nico Karssemeijer
Nico Karssemeijer Radboud University
Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey National Institutes of Health
Peter F.A. Mulders
Peter F.A. Mulders Radboud University
Jeffrey C. Weinreb
Jeffrey C. Weinreb Yale University
Wim J.G. Oyen
Wim J.G. Oyen Humanitas University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine often leads students to explore alternative online degree pathways in healthcare. Nursing, in particular, offers flexible online options suited for various backgrounds and career goals. For those looking to advance their education, an online PhD in nursing can open doors to leadership, research, and academic roles.

Aspiring nurses or working RNs seeking to upgrade credentials can benefit from learning about what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online, making it easier to earn a BSN with minimal financial burden. Individuals with non-nursing backgrounds can seamlessly enter the nursing profession by considering direct entry msn programs online designed for career changers or non-nurses.

For those interested in an accessible starting point, many online adn programs offer streamlined admissions and a fast route to becoming a registered nurse. Each of these online pathways supports different career ambitions within healthcare and can be a stepping stone toward a rewarding role in patient care or medical leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Jelle O. Barentsz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles