World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 47 1369 1264 544 471 309 8332

Steven L. Ceccio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven L. Ceccio between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven L. Ceccio published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2009. 4 of the 323 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2009. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1989 2025

323 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven L. Ceccio: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 4
1993 2
1994 3
1995 9
1996 5
1997 12
1998 8
1999 4
2000 7
2001 15
2002 9
2003 15
2004 15
2005 14
2006 15
2007 12
2008 11
2009 17
2010 11
2011 10
2012 10
2013 16
2014 10
2015 15
2016 13
2017 13
2018 11
2019 13
2020 7
2021 6
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
2025 3
Total 323
Download as CSV

Steven L. Ceccio publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Ceccio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 307–316 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 309 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62 309
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven L. Ceccio D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven L. Ceccio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70 47
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fluids Engineering Award, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • 2009 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For experimental advancements in multiphase and highReynolds number flows, including cavitating flows, gassolid flows, and skin friction drag reduction using gas and polymer injection
  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

Steven L. Ceccio is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Engineering. Their work extensively covers several subfields including Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Ocean Engineering, and Surfaces, Coatings and Films.

The scientist's research interests are centered on topics such as cavitation phenomena in pumps, fluid dynamics simulations and interactions, fluid dynamics and vibration analysis, fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies, surface modification and superhydrophobicity, fluid dynamics and heat transfer, as well as spacecraft and cryogenic technologies.

Recent published papers illustrate the scope of their research, including the following:

  • Rapid and Robust Surface Treatment for Simultaneous Solid and Liquid Repellency (2021, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces)
  • Cavitation dynamics and vortex shedding in the wake of a bluff body (2021, Journal of Fluid Mechanics)
  • Partial cavity shedding on a hydrofoil resulting from re-entrant flow and bubbly shock waves (2023, Journal of Fluid Mechanics)
  • Cavitating flow behind a backward facing step (2021, International Journal of Multiphase Flow)
  • Data-based analysis of multimodal partial cavity shedding dynamics (2020, Experiments in Fluids)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics (3 publications)
  • International Journal of Multiphase Flow (2 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (2 publications)
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (1 publication)
  • Experiments in Fluids (1 publication)

Regular collaborators in their research include Harish Ganesh, Anubhav Bhatt, James W. Gose, Kevin Golovin, and Mathew Boban, with multiple joint publications recorded.

Awards recognizing their contributions include the Fluids Engineering Award from The American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2021, Fellowship of the American Physical Society awarded in 2009 with citation for advancements in multiphase and high-Reynolds number flows, and Fellowship of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers received in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Friction Drag Reduction of External Flows with Bubble and Gas Injection

    Steven L. Ceccio

  • Bubbly shock propagation as a mechanism for sheet-to-cloud transition of partial cavities

    Harish Ganesh;Simo A. Mäkiharju;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Partial cavity flows. Part 1. Cavities forming on models without spanwise variation

    K. R. Laberteaux;S. L. Ceccio

  • Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer

    Wendy C. Sanders;Eric S. Winkel;David R. Dowling;Marc Perlin

  • Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction

    Brian R. Elbing;Eric S. Winkel;Keary A. Lay;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Observations of the Dynamics and Acoustics of Travelling Bubble Cavitation

    S. L. Ceccio;C. E. Brennen

  • Liftoff of turbulent jet flames - Assessment of edge flame and other concepts using cinema-PIV

    Ansis Upatnieks;James F. Driscoll;Chadwick C. Rasmussen;Steven L. Ceccio

  • A review of electrical impedance techniques for the measurement of multiphase flows

    S. L. Ceccio;D. L. George

  • Characterization of superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction in turbulent flow

    James W. Gose;Kevin Golovin;Mathew Boban;Joseph M. Mabry

  • On the energy economics of air lubrication drag reduction

    Simo A. Mäkiharju;Marc Perlin;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Validation of Electrical-Impedance Tomography for Measurements of Material Distribution in Two-Phase Flows

    D.L. George;J.R. Torczynski;K.A. Shollenberger;T.J. O’Hern

  • Skin-friction drag reduction in the turbulent regime using random-textured hydrophobic surfaces

    Rahul A. Bidkar;Luc Leblanc;Ambarish J. Kulkarni;Vaibhav Bahadur

  • Universal scaling for polymer chain scission in turbulence

    Siva A. Vanapalli;Steven L. Ceccio;Michael J. Solomon

  • The influence of developed cavitation on the flow of a turbulent shear layer

    Claudia O. Iyer;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction

    Xiaochun Shen;Steven L. Ceccio;Marc Perlin

  • The effect of electrical transients on the shear stresses in electrorheological fluids

    J. M. Ginder;S. L. Ceccio

  • Modeling and Parametric Study of Torque in Open Clutch Plates

    Chinar R. Aphale;Jinhyun Cho;William W. Schultz;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Partial cavity flows. Part 2. Cavities forming on test objects with spanwise variation

    K. R. Laberteaux;S. L. Ceccio

  • Bioinspired surfaces for turbulent drag reduction.

    Kevin B. Golovin;James W. Gose;Marc Perlin;Steven L. Ceccio

  • Measurements of turbulent premixed flame dynamics using cinema stereoscopic PIV

    Adam M. Steinberg;James F. Driscoll;Steven L. Ceccio

  • THE DYNAMICS AND ACOUSTICS OF TRAVELLING BUBBLE CAVITATION

    S. Ceccio;C. Brennen

  • Electrical impedance techniques for the measurement of multiphase flows

    S. L. Ceccio

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Perlin
Marc Perlin Texas A&M University
David R. Dowling
David R. Dowling University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gretar Tryggvason
Gretar Tryggvason Johns Hopkins University
James F. Driscoll
James F. Driscoll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Yin Lu Young
Yin Lu Young University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anish Tuteja
Anish Tuteja University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher E. Brennen
Christopher E. Brennen California Institute of Technology
Michael J. Solomon
Michael J. Solomon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christophe Pierre
Christophe Pierre Stevens Institute of Technology
Matthew P. Castanier
Matthew P. Castanier United States Army Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career options. For instance, some students find it helpful to understand different types of counselors in educational or technical support roles, which can complement engineering work by addressing teamwork and communication challenges in complex projects. Learn more about type of counselors.

For those interested in branching into fields like engineering management or human factors, choosing programs wisely can impact your academic journey. Considering programs labeled as the easiest degree in counseling might offer insights into selecting flexible and manageable courses that supplement your primary technical skills.

In addition to engineering, many professionals explore quick ways to enhance their credentials. For example, the quickest online ABA masters program highlights how some online degrees can be completed efficiently, a factor worth considering if time and flexibility are priorities.

Finally, understanding acceptance standards is crucial when applying to competitive programs. If you are interested in speech-language pathology or similar specialized fields that intersect with engineering communication, checking the slp acceptance rate can provide valuable perspective on admission challenges and requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Steven L. Ceccio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles