World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Xinping Long

Xinping Long

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 34 2884 2707 358 357 112 4301

Xinping Long publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xinping Long between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xinping Long published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 22 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
2002 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xinping Long: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 3
2010 0
2011 0
2012 6
2013 6
2014 9
2015 5
2016 12
2017 12
2018 16
2019 12
2020 12
2021 9
2022 15
2023 6
2024 11
2025 11
Total 148
Download as CSV

Xinping Long publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xinping Long sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 112 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113 112
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Xinping Long D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xinping Long sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189 34
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Xinping Long is affiliated with Wuhan University in China, engaging primarily in research within the field of engineering. Their academic focus is reflected across several subfields, which include Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, and Organic Chemistry.

Their research extensively covers topics such as Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps, Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems, Energetic Materials and Combustion, Water Systems and Optimization, Combustion and Detonation Processes, Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions, and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis.

Frequent collaboration partners in Xinping Long's scholarly work include Bin Ji, Huaiyu Cheng, Zuti Zhang, Yong Han, and Bisheng Tan.

Publications have appeared predominantly in journals such as:

  • Journal of Hydrodynamics
  • Physics of Fluids
  • AIP Advances
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Defence Technology

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on cavitation and fluid dynamics phenomena, with titles including:

  • A new Euler-Lagrangian cavitation model for tip-vortex cavitation with the effect of non-condensable gas (2020, International Journal of Multiphase Flow)
  • A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control (2021, Journal of Hydrodynamics)
  • Suppressing tip-leakage vortex cavitation by overhanging grooves (2020, Experiments in Fluids)
  • Experimental study of the cavitation noise and vibration induced by the choked flow in a Venturi reactor (2020, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry)
  • Comparative Study of different vortex identification methods in a tip-leakage cavitating flow (2020, Ocean Engineering)

Best Publications

  • Large eddy simulation and Euler–Lagrangian coupling investigation of the transient cavitating turbulent flow around a twisted hydrofoil

    Xinping Long;Huaiyu Cheng;Bin Ji;Roger E.A. Arndt

  • Numerical investigation on the mixing process in a steam ejector with different nozzle structures

    X. Yang;X. Long;X. Yao

  • Experimental investigation on the mechanical properties of a low-clay shale with different adsorption times in sub-/super-critical CO2

    Qiao Lyu;Xinping Long;P.G. Ranjith;Jingqiang Tan

  • A review of shale swelling by water adsorption

    Qiao Lyu;P.G. Ranjith;Xinping Long;Yong Kang

  • Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Black Shales after CO2-Water-Rock Interaction

    Qiao Lyu;Pathegama Gamage Ranjith;Xinping Long;Bin Ji

  • Verification and validation of Large Eddy Simulation of attached cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil

    Yun Long;Xinping Long;Bin Ji;Tao Xing

  • Combined experimental observation and numerical simulation of the cloud cavitation with U-type flow structures on hydrofoils

    X.X. Peng;Bin Ji;Yantao Cao;Lianghao Xu

  • Large eddy simulation of turbulent attached cavitating flow with special emphasis on large scale structures of the hydrofoil wake and turbulence-cavitation interactions

    Bin Ji;Bin Ji;Yun Long;Xin-ping Long;Zhong-dong Qian

  • Experimental investigation on the mechanical behaviours of a low-clay shale under water-based fluids

    Qiao Lyu;Qiao Lyu;Xinping Long;P.G. Ranjith;Jingqiang Tan

  • Verification and validation of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around the hydrofoil

    Yun Long;Yun Long;Xin-ping Long;Bin Ji;Bin Ji;Wen-xin Huai

  • A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control

    Huai-yu Cheng;Huai-yu Cheng;Bin Ji;Xin-ping Long;Wen-xin Huai

  • Investigation on mechanism of critical cavitating flow in liquid jet pumps under operating limits

    X. Long;H. Yao;J. Zhao

  • Experimental investigation of the global cavitation dynamic behavior in a venturi tube with special emphasis on the cavity length variation

    Xinping Long;Xinping Long;Junqiang Zhang;Jiong Wang;Maosen Xu

  • Numerical investigation of attached cavitation shedding dynamics around the Clark-Y hydrofoil with the FBDCM and an integral method

    Xinping Long;Xinping Long;Huaiyu Cheng;Bin Ji;Bin Ji;Roger E.A. Arndt

  • Cavitating flow in annular jet pumps

    L. Xiao;X. Long

  • LES investigation of the influence of cavitation on flow patterns in a confined tip-leakage flow

    Huaiyu Cheng;Xinping Long;Bin Ji;Xiaoxing Peng

  • Experimental study of the cavitation noise and vibration induced by the choked flow in a Venturi reactor

    Shuangjie Xu;Jiong Wang;Huaiyu Cheng;Bin Ji

  • Numerical investigation of two typical cavitation shedding dynamics flow in liquid hydrogen with thermodynamic effects

    Xinping Long;Qi Liu;Bin Ji;Yiyuan Lu

  • Suppressing tip-leakage vortex cavitation by overhanging grooves

    Huaiyu Cheng;Huaiyu Cheng;Xinping Long;Bin Ji;Xiaoxing Peng

  • Numerical simulation of cavitation surge and vortical flows in a diffuser with swirling flow

    Bin Ji;Jiong Wang;X. Luo;K. Miyagawa

Frequent Co-Authors

Pathegama Gamage Ranjith
Pathegama Gamage Ranjith Monash University
Roger E. A. Arndt
Roger E. A. Arndt University of Minnesota
Yoshinobu Tsujimoto
Yoshinobu Tsujimoto Osaka University
Chaoqun Liu
Chaoqun Liu The University of Texas at Arlington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways beyond traditional engineering roles. Many students consider complementary fields that blend technical expertise with human-centered services. For example, those interested in behavioral sciences might explore accelerated programs like the bcba accelerated program, which offers rapid advancement in applied behavior analysis, a growing area with strong career demand.

Alternatively, if you are inclined towards mental health, it's worth examining the different therapy degrees available online. These degrees provide various specialization routes, often complementing skills learned in engineering through problem-solving and analytical thinking.

For those seeking a more accessible entry point, consider the best easiest counseling degree programs, which can streamline the education process without sacrificing quality. Such programs can lead to meaningful careers supporting community and individual well-being.

Additionally, careers like becoming a criminal profiler might appeal to those who enjoy combining engineering principles with psychology and investigative work. This unique pathway highlights how online degrees can diversify career options beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Xinping Long

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles