World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
11394
World Ranking
3577
National Ranking
1649

Craig E. Tenke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig E. Tenke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Craig E. Tenke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig E. Tenke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Craig E. Tenke is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research focuses on the psychological and neuroscientific aspects of mental health, with a particular emphasis on depression, brain function, and the intersection of religion and spirituality with psychological wellbeing.

Their recent scholarly contributions include several publications spanning from 2020 to 2024. Notable papers include:

  • Predicting Depression Symptoms in Families at Risk for Depression: Interrelations of Posterior EEG Alpha and Religion/Spirituality, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • EEG measures of brain arousal in relation to symptom improvement in patients with major depressive disorder: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, 2024, Psychiatry Research
  • Predicting Depression Symptoms in Families at Risk for Depression: Interactive Roles of Posterior EEG Alpha and Religion/Spirituality, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Family Risk for Depression and Prioritization of Religion or Spirituality: Early Modulations of Event-Related Potentials to Unpleasant Pictures, 2020, Biological Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tenke include:

  • Myrna M. Weissman
  • Jürgen Kayser
  • Connie Svob
  • Priya Wickramaratne
  • Marc J. Gameroff

Their work is often published in these venues:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Psychiatry Research

The main fields of study for Tenke's research are:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, subtopics include:

  • Health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Tenke's research addresses a range of key topics, largely centering on mental health and neurological function:

  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Best Publications

  • Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks.

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig E. Tenke

  • Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: a quantitative electroencephalographic study.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Regan Fong;Craig E. Tenke;Paul Leite

  • Religiosity and Major Depression in Adults at High Risk: A Ten-Year Prospective Study

    Lisa Miller;Priya Wickramaratne;Marc J. Gameroff;Mia Sage

  • Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig E Tenke

  • Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: II. Adequacy of low-density estimates.

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig E. Tenke

  • Electroencephalographic Alpha Measures Predict Therapeutic Response to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant: Pre- and Post-Treatment Findings

    Gerard E. Bruder;James P. Sedoruk;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.

    Craig E. Tenke;Jürgen Kayser

  • On the benefits of using surface Laplacian (Current Source Density) methodology in electrophysiology

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig E. Tenke

  • Striate cortical contribution to the surface-recorded pattern-reversal VEP in the alert monkey.

    C.E. Schroeder;C.E. Tenke;S.J. Givre;J.C. Arezzo

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) to hemifield presentations of emotional stimuli: differences between depressed patients and healthy adults in P3 amplitude and asymmetry.

    Jürgen Kayser;Gerard E Bruder;Craig E Tenke;Jonathan E Stewart

  • Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig E. Tenke

  • Electroencephalographic and perceptual asymmetry differences between responders and nonresponders to an SSRI antidepressant

    Gerard E Bruder;Jonathan W Stewart;Craig E Tenke;Patrick J McGrath

  • Behavioral activation system deficits predict the six-month course of depression.

    Brian R. McFarland;Stewart A. Shankman;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Reference-free quantification of EEG spectra: Combining current source density (CSD) and frequency principal components analysis (fPCA)

    Craig E. Tenke;Jürgen Kayser

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of religiosity and spirituality: a study in adults at high and low familial risk for depression.

    Lisa Miller;Ravi Bansal;Priya Wickramaratne;Priya Wickramaratne;Xuejun Hao

  • The incidence of depressive symptomatology in juvenile sex offenders with a history of abuse.

    Judith V. Becker;Meg S. Kaplan;Craig E. Tenke;Aldo Tartaglini

  • Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders.

    Lisa M. Kentgen;Craig E. Tenke;Daniel S. Pine;Regan Fong

  • Current Source Density Measures of Electroencephalographic Alpha Predict Antidepressant Treatment Response

    Craig E. Tenke;Jürgen Kayser;Carlye G. Manna;Shiva Fekri

  • Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a visual half-field paradigm.

    Jürgen Kayser;Craig Tenke;Helge Nordby;Dag Hammerborg

  • Reward sensitivity in depression: A biobehavioral study.

    Stewart A. Shankman;Daniel N. Klein;Craig E. Tenke;Gerard E. Bruder

  • Pretreatment Rostral Anterior Cingulate Cortex Theta Activity in Relation to Symptom Improvement in Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Diego A. Pizzagalli;Christian A. Webb;Daniel G. Dillon;Craig E. Tenke

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerard E. Bruder
Gerard E. Bruder Columbia University
Jürgen Kayser
Jürgen Kayser Columbia University
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University
Virginia Warner
Virginia Warner Columbia University
Priya Wickramaratne
Priya Wickramaratne Columbia University
Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath Columbia University
Jonathan W. Stewart
Jonathan W. Stewart Columbia University
Stewart A. Shankman
Stewart A. Shankman Northwestern University
Frederic M. Quitkin
Frederic M. Quitkin Columbia University
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens doors to diverse educational and professional opportunities. Many students are turning to accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited programs for a faster and more flexible route to completing their studies. These programs can be ideal for those seeking to enter the workforce quickly or transition between fields without delays.

Neuroscience is closely linked with fields considered among the best bachelor degrees and highest paying college majors in the U.S., such as psychology, computer science, biology, and biomedical engineering. Choosing the right major or specialization can significantly impact earning potential and career advancement.

Cost is a major factor when selecting an online degree. Many students look for the cheapest online college that accepts FAFSA to help minimize tuition and student debt. Effective financial planning, combined with a clear understanding of the job market, can help ensure long-term success in neuroscience and related career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Craig E. Tenke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles