World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederic M. Quitkin

Frederic M. Quitkin

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
20237
World Ranking
17259
National Ranking
8649

Frederic M. Quitkin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic M. Quitkin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 222 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederic M. Quitkin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederic M. Quitkin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederic M. Quitkin was affiliated with Columbia University in the United States during their academic career. Their professional work remained connected to this institution, reflecting a stable academic position within a leading university environment.

There are no specific details available about Frederic M. Quitkin's recent research papers, including titles, publication venues, or citation metrics. Similarly, no information is provided regarding frequent co-authors or specific venues where they published repeatedly.

Their research activities do not currently show documented main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics with associated publication counts. No book publications or publishers connected to Frederic M. Quitkin have been listed in the available data.

No awards or honors have been recorded, and the scientist is noted as deceased. The absence of these elements restricts an in-depth understanding of their academic influence based on the supplied information.

Best Publications

  • Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR * D): rationale and design

    A.John Rush;Maurizio Fava;Stephen R Wisniewski;Philip W Lavori

  • Light therapy for seasonal affective disorder. A review of efficacy.

    M Terman;J S Terman;F M Quitkin;P J McGrath

  • Background and rationale for the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) study.

    Maurizio Fava;A. John Rush;Madhukar H. Trivedi;Andrew A. Nierenberg

  • Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: a quantitative electroencephalographic study.

    Gerard E. Bruder;Regan Fong;Craig E. Tenke;Paul Leite

  • Neurologic Soft Signs in Schizophrenia and Character Disorders: Organicity in Schizophrenia With Premorbid Asociality and Emotionally Unstable Character Disorders

    Frederic Quitkin;Arthur Rifkin;Donald F. Klein

  • Antidepressant Specificity in Atypical Depression

    Michael R. Liebowitz;Frederic M. Quitkin;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Divalproex treatment for youth with explosive temper and mood lability: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design.

    Stephen J. Donovan;Jonathan W. Stewart;Edward V. Nunes;Frederic M. Quitkin

  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. A review of antidepressant effectiveness.

    Frederic Quitkin;Arthur Rifkin;Donald F. Klein

  • Phenelzine v Imipramine in Atypical Depression: A Preliminary Report

    Michael R. Liebowitz;Frederic M. Quitkin;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Electroencephalographic Alpha Measures Predict Therapeutic Response to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant: Pre- and Post-Treatment Findings

    Gerard E. Bruder;James P. Sedoruk;Jonathan W. Stewart;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Phobic anxiety syndrome complicated by drug dependence and addiction. A treatable form of drug abuse.

    Frederic M. Quitkin;Arthur Rifkin;Joel Kaplan;Donald F. Klein

  • Akinesia: A Poorly Recognized Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Behavioral Disorder

    Arthur Rifkin;Frederic Quitkin;Donald F. Klein

  • Identification of True Drug Response to Antidepressants: Use of Pattern Analysis

    Frederic M. Quitkin;Judith G. Rabkin;Donald Ross;Jonathan W. Stewart

  • Imipramine treatment of alcoholics with primary depression: A placebo-controlled clinical trial.

    Patrick J. McGrath;Edward V. Nunes;Jonathan W. Stewart;Deberah Goldman

  • Duration of antidepressant drug treatment. What is an adequate trial

    Frederic M. Quitkin;Judith G. Rabkin;Donald Ross;Patrick J. McGrath

  • Fluphenazine vs Placebo in Patients With Remitted, Acute First-Episode Schizophrenia

    John M. Kane;Arthur Rifkin;Frederic Quitkin;Devdutt Nayak

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) to hemifield presentations of emotional stimuli: differences between depressed patients and healthy adults in P3 amplitude and asymmetry.

    Jürgen Kayser;Gerard E Bruder;Craig E Tenke;Jonathan E Stewart

  • Optimal Length of Continuation Therapy in Depression: A Prospective Assessment During Long-Term Fluoxetine Treatment

    Frederick W. Reimherr;Jay D. Amsterdam;Frederic M. Quitkin;Jerrold F. Rosenbaum

  • Use of Pattern Analysis to Identify True Drug Response: A Replication

    Frederic M. Quitkin;Judith D. Rabkin;Jefferey M. Markowitz;Jonathan W. Stewart

  • Effects of antidepressant medication on sexual function: a controlled study.

    Wilma M. Harrison;Judith G. Rabkin;Anke A. Ehrhardt;Jonathan W. Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan W. Stewart
Jonathan W. Stewart Columbia University
Patrick J. McGrath
Patrick J. McGrath Columbia University
Donald F. Klein
Donald F. Klein New York University
Judith G. Rabkin
Judith G. Rabkin Columbia University
Edward V. Nunes
Edward V. Nunes Columbia University
Gerard E. Bruder
Gerard E. Bruder Columbia University
Michael R. Liebowitz
Michael R. Liebowitz Columbia University
Jerrold F. Rosenbaum
Jerrold F. Rosenbaum Harvard University
Maurizio Fava
Maurizio Fava Harvard University
Jay D. Amsterdam
Jay D. Amsterdam University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always start with medical school. There are many related online degrees and pathways that can boost your credentials or even offer alternative routes in healthcare. Exploring online nutrition degree programs is an excellent option for those interested in the growing field of dietetics, wellness, and preventive medicine.

For those looking to move into healthcare administration, top cahme-accredited mha programs offer the flexibility of online study with industry-recognized accreditation. Nurses seeking further qualifications may prefer the streamlined route of rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, which focus on theory and leadership skills without the need for additional hands-on clinical hours.

Likewise, experienced nurses wanting to advance into leadership or specialized clinical roles might consider shortest dnp programs to efficiently earn a doctoral degree online. Exploring these diverse educational pathways can expand your opportunities in the dynamic field of medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Frederic M. Quitkin

Recently Published Articles