World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4079 3767 1943 1762 102 10141

Mark Chaffin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Chaffin between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Chaffin published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 1 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Chaffin: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 5
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 6
2005 3
2006 11
2007 2
2008 6
2009 4
2010 0
2011 6
2012 7
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 6
2017 10
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 105
Download as CSV

Mark Chaffin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chaffin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 102
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Chaffin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chaffin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Chaffin is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by engagement in research activities aligned with this institution.

There is no available information regarding specific publications, frequent co-authors, or commonly targeted publication venues related to Mark Chaffin. Details about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or core research topics have not been documented.

No recorded awards or honors have been listed for Mark Chaffin, and the individual is currently living.

Due to the lack of detailed data on research outputs or collaborations, it is not possible to provide a detailed overview of scientific contributions or areas of expertise beyond the known institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With Physically Abusive Parents: Efficacy for Reducing Future Abuse Reports.

    Mark Chaffin;Jane F. Silovsky;Beverly Funderburk;Linda Anne Valle

  • Onset of Physical Abuse and Neglect: Psychiatric, Substance Abuse, and Social Risk Factors from Prospective Community Data

    Mark Chaffin;Kelly Kelleher;Jan Hollenberg

  • Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention

    Gregory A Aarons;Gregory A Aarons;Amy E Green;Amy E Green;Lawrence A Palinkas;Lawrence A Palinkas;Shannon Self-Brown

  • Alcohol and drug disorders among physically abusive and neglectful parents in a community-based sample.

    Kelly Kelleher;Mark Chaffin;Janice Hollenberg;Ellen Fischer

  • Evidence-based treatments in child abuse and neglect

    Mark Chaffin;Bill Friedrich

  • The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation and Fidelity Monitoring on Staff Turnover: Evidence for a Protective Effect

    Gregory A. Aarons;David H. Sommerfeld;Debra B. Hecht;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems.

    Mark Chaffin;Rochelle Hanson;Benjamin E. Saunders;Todd Nichols

  • A Statewide Trial of the SafeCare Home-based Services Model With Parents in Child Protective Services

    Mark Chaffin;Debra Hecht;David Bard;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Family preservation and family support programs: child maltreatment outcomes across client risk levels and program types

    Mark Chaffin;Barbara L Bonner;Robert F Hill

  • A combined motivation and parent-child interaction therapy package reduces child welfare recidivism in a randomized dismantling field trial.

    Mark Chaffin;Beverly Funderburk;David Bard;Linda Anne Valle

  • Our minds are made up--don't confuse us with the facts: commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders.

    Mark Chaffin

  • Report of the ATSA Task Force on Children With Sexual Behavior Problems

    Mark Chaffin;Lucy Berliner;Richard Block;Toni Cavanagh Johnson

  • A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: development and validation.

    Steven J. Ondersma;Mark J. Chaffin;Sharon M. Mullins;James M. LeBreton

  • False Negatives in Sexual Abuse Disclosure Interviews

    Unknown

  • Randomized trial of treatment for children with sexual behavior problems: ten-year follow-up

    Melissa Y. Carpentier;Jane F. Silovsky;Mark Chaffin

  • A motivational intervention can improve retention in PCIT for low-motivation child welfare clients.

    Mark Chaffin;Linda Anne Valle;Beverly Funderburk;Robin Gurwitch

  • Adults, adolescents, and children who sexually abuse children: A developmental perspective.

    Mark Chaffin;Elizabeth Letourneau;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Prevention of child maltreatment in high-risk rural families: A randomized clinical trial with child welfare outcomes

    Jane F. Silovsky;David Bard;Mark Chaffin;Debra Hecht

  • The Abuse Dimensions Inventory: Initial Data on a Research Measure of Abuse Severity

    Mark Chaffin;Jeffrey N. Wherry;Chris Newlin;Anne Crutchfield

  • Is it time to rethink Healthy Start/Healthy Families?

    Mark Chaffin

  • Dynamic prediction characteristics of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory

    Mark Chaffin;Linda Anne Valle

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Lucy Berliner
Lucy Berliner University of Washington
Lawrence A. Palinkas
Lawrence A. Palinkas University of California, San Diego
Cathleen E. Willging
Cathleen E. Willging Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Elizabeth J. Letourneau
Elizabeth J. Letourneau Johns Hopkins University
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck Griffith University
Daniel J. Whitaker
Daniel J. Whitaker Georgia State University
John R. Lutzker
John R. Lutzker Georgia State University
Benjamin E. Saunders
Benjamin E. Saunders Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide range of flexible career opportunities. Many students are now choosing online degrees in psychology to prepare for roles in counseling, research, or human resources. These programs often provide affordability and convenience, making them popular for working professionals.

For those interested in social work, msw degree online programs offer an accessible pathway to careers in community organizations, healthcare, and advocacy. These programs are designed to help students enter the workforce quickly while developing critical skills.

If you’re seeking advanced licensure or clinical practice, accelerated psyd programs and mft accredited programs deliver specialized training for future psychologists or marriage and family therapists. These programs emphasize practical experience and leadership in mental health settings.

Ultimately, the flexibility of online education empowers students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments while advancing toward rewarding careers in the social sciences and humanities field.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Chaffin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles