World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
10141
World Ranking
4079
National Ranking
1943

Mark Chaffin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chaffin sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark Chaffin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Chaffin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Chaffin is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by engagement in research activities aligned with this institution.

There is no available information regarding specific publications, frequent co-authors, or commonly targeted publication venues related to Mark Chaffin. Details about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or core research topics have not been documented.

No recorded awards or honors have been listed for Mark Chaffin, and the individual is currently living.

Due to the lack of detailed data on research outputs or collaborations, it is not possible to provide a detailed overview of scientific contributions or areas of expertise beyond the known institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Parent-Child Interaction Therapy With Physically Abusive Parents: Efficacy for Reducing Future Abuse Reports.

    Mark Chaffin;Jane F. Silovsky;Beverly Funderburk;Linda Anne Valle

  • Onset of Physical Abuse and Neglect: Psychiatric, Substance Abuse, and Social Risk Factors from Prospective Community Data

    Mark Chaffin;Kelly Kelleher;Jan Hollenberg

  • Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention

    Gregory A Aarons;Gregory A Aarons;Amy E Green;Amy E Green;Lawrence A Palinkas;Lawrence A Palinkas;Shannon Self-Brown

  • Alcohol and drug disorders among physically abusive and neglectful parents in a community-based sample.

    Kelly Kelleher;Mark Chaffin;Janice Hollenberg;Ellen Fischer

  • Evidence-based treatments in child abuse and neglect

    Mark Chaffin;Bill Friedrich

  • The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation and Fidelity Monitoring on Staff Turnover: Evidence for a Protective Effect

    Gregory A. Aarons;David H. Sommerfeld;Debra B. Hecht;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems.

    Mark Chaffin;Rochelle Hanson;Benjamin E. Saunders;Todd Nichols

  • A Statewide Trial of the SafeCare Home-based Services Model With Parents in Child Protective Services

    Mark Chaffin;Debra Hecht;David Bard;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Family preservation and family support programs: child maltreatment outcomes across client risk levels and program types

    Mark Chaffin;Barbara L Bonner;Robert F Hill

  • A combined motivation and parent-child interaction therapy package reduces child welfare recidivism in a randomized dismantling field trial.

    Mark Chaffin;Beverly Funderburk;David Bard;Linda Anne Valle

  • Our minds are made up--don't confuse us with the facts: commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders.

    Mark Chaffin

  • Report of the ATSA Task Force on Children With Sexual Behavior Problems

    Mark Chaffin;Lucy Berliner;Richard Block;Toni Cavanagh Johnson

  • A brief form of the child abuse potential inventory: development and validation.

    Steven J. Ondersma;Mark J. Chaffin;Sharon M. Mullins;James M. LeBreton

  • False Negatives in Sexual Abuse Disclosure Interviews

    Unknown

  • Randomized trial of treatment for children with sexual behavior problems: ten-year follow-up

    Melissa Y. Carpentier;Jane F. Silovsky;Mark Chaffin

  • A motivational intervention can improve retention in PCIT for low-motivation child welfare clients.

    Mark Chaffin;Linda Anne Valle;Beverly Funderburk;Robin Gurwitch

  • Adults, adolescents, and children who sexually abuse children: A developmental perspective.

    Mark Chaffin;Elizabeth Letourneau;Jane F. Silovsky

  • Prevention of child maltreatment in high-risk rural families: A randomized clinical trial with child welfare outcomes

    Jane F. Silovsky;David Bard;Mark Chaffin;Debra Hecht

  • The Abuse Dimensions Inventory: Initial Data on a Research Measure of Abuse Severity

    Mark Chaffin;Jeffrey N. Wherry;Chris Newlin;Anne Crutchfield

  • Is it time to rethink Healthy Start/Healthy Families?

    Mark Chaffin

  • Dynamic prediction characteristics of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory

    Mark Chaffin;Linda Anne Valle

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Lucy Berliner
Lucy Berliner University of Washington
Lawrence A. Palinkas
Lawrence A. Palinkas University of California, San Diego
Cathleen E. Willging
Cathleen E. Willging Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Elizabeth J. Letourneau
Elizabeth J. Letourneau Johns Hopkins University
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck Griffith University
Daniel J. Whitaker
Daniel J. Whitaker Georgia State University
John R. Lutzker
John R. Lutzker Georgia State University
Benjamin E. Saunders
Benjamin E. Saunders Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide range of flexible career opportunities. Many students are now choosing online degrees in psychology to prepare for roles in counseling, research, or human resources. These programs often provide affordability and convenience, making them popular for working professionals.

For those interested in social work, msw degree online programs offer an accessible pathway to careers in community organizations, healthcare, and advocacy. These programs are designed to help students enter the workforce quickly while developing critical skills.

If you’re seeking advanced licensure or clinical practice, accelerated psyd programs and mft accredited programs deliver specialized training for future psychologists or marriage and family therapists. These programs emphasize practical experience and leadership in mental health settings.

Ultimately, the flexibility of online education empowers students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments while advancing toward rewarding careers in the social sciences and humanities field.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Chaffin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles