World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
15053
World Ranking
4239
National Ranking
126

Sharon Oviatt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Oviatt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sharon Oviatt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Oviatt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the empirical and theoretical foundations of multimodal systems, and to human-centered computer interfaces.

Overview

Sharon Oviatt is affiliated with Monash University in Australia, focusing on interdisciplinary research that spans psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. Their work encompasses both foundational and applied aspects of human interaction with technology.

The scientist's primary fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience

Subfields within these domains show specialization in:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

The topics addressed in their research include:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Color perception and design
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

The scientist has published multiple recent papers, among them:

  • A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction, 2021, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • A Critical Review of Multimodal-multisensor Analytics for Anxiety Assessment, 2022, ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
  • I Know What You Know: What Hand Movements Reveal about Domain Expertise, 2021, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • Conversational Search for Learning Technologies, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Leimin Tian
  • Michał Muszyński
  • Brent C. Chamberlain
  • Jennifer Healey
  • Akane Sano

Publication venues reflect a multidisciplinary audience, with contributions to:

  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
  • ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Sharon Oviatt has also authored a book titled Applied Affective Computing, published by the Association for Computing Machinery in 2022.

The scientist has been recognized with awards such as the ACM Fellow, received in 2016 for contributions to the empirical and theoretical foundations of multimodal systems and human-centered computer interfaces.

Best Publications

  • Ten myths of multimodal interaction

    Sharon Oviatt

  • Multimodal interfaces

    Sharon Oviatt

  • QuickSet: multimodal interaction for distributed applications

    Philip R. Cohen;Michael Johnston;David McGee;Sharon Oviatt

  • MULTIMODAL INTERFACES THAT PROCESS WHAT COMES NATURALLY

    Sharon L. Oviatt;Philip R. Cohen

  • Perceptual user interfaces: multimodal interfaces that process what comes naturally

    Sharon Oviatt;Philip Cohen

  • Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction

    Sharon Oviatt;Antonella DeAngeli;Karen Kuhn

  • Designing the user interface for multimodal speech and pen-based gesture applications: state-of-the-art systems and future research directions

    Sharon Oviatt;Phil Cohen;Lizhong Wu;John Vergo

  • Mutual disambiguation of recognition errors in a multimodel architecture

    Sharon Oviatt

  • Multimodal Interfaces: A Survey of Principles, Models and Frameworks

    Bruno Dumas;Denis Lalanne;Sharon Oviatt

  • Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think

    Sharon Oviatt

  • Taming recognition errors with a multimodal interface

    Sharon Oviatt

  • Unification-based Multimodal Integration

    Michael Johnston;Philip R. Cohen;David McGee;Sharon L. Oviatt

  • Multimodal interactive maps: designing for human performance

    Sharon Oviatt

  • When do we interact multimodally?: cognitive load and multimodal communication patterns

    Sharon Oviatt;Rachel Coulston;Rebecca Lunsford

  • Guidelines for multimodal user interface design

    Leah M. Reeves;Jennifer Lai;James A. Larson;Sharon Oviatt

  • The role of voice input for human-machine communication

    Philip R. Cohen;Sharon L. Oviatt

  • Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps

    Sharon Oviatt

  • Predicting spoken disfluencies during human-computer interaction

    Sharon L. Oviatt

  • Multimodal integration-a statistical view

    Lizhong Wu;S.L. Oviatt;P.R. Cohen

  • The challenge of spoken language systems: Research directions for the nineties

    R. Cole;L. Hirschman;L. Atlas;M. Beckman

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip R. Cohen
Philip R. Cohen Openstream, Inc.
Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Gerasimos Potamianos
Gerasimos Potamianos University Of Thessaly
Antonio Krüger
Antonio Krüger German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Michael V. Johnston
Michael V. Johnston Kennedy Krieger Institute
Gerald Penn
Gerald Penn University of Toronto
Louis-Philippe Morency
Louis-Philippe Morency Carnegie Mellon University
Trevor Darrell
Trevor Darrell University of California, Berkeley
Mark A. Clements
Mark A. Clements Georgia Institute of Technology
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology and remote learning advance, students interested in computer science have more flexible options than ever. For those who wish to fast-track their studies, a computer science accelerated program can offer a quicker route to a degree, ideal for motivated individuals eager to enter the workforce.

Computer science skills also overlap with other growing fields. For example, those interested in sustainability and technology might consider environmental engineering degrees online, which prepare graduates to tackle urgent ecological challenges with engineering solutions.

Many technical careers begin with online programs that prioritize both quality and affordability. If cost is a concern, finding the right mechanical engineering degree cost can help manage expenses while providing a solid foundation for engineering careers.

Finally, if you're wondering, can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes—accredited online physics programs now make it possible to pursue this fundamental science from anywhere, opening up diverse job pathways in research and industry.

Best Scientists Citing Sharon Oviatt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles