World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
10847
World Ranking
2924
National Ranking
117

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
11473
World Ranking
5303
National Ranking
80

Emiel Krahmer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiel Krahmer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 476 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Emiel Krahmer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiel Krahmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Emiel Krahmer is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a significant focus on subfields such as artificial intelligence, general health professions, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their work explores several main topics, including:

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies
  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Krahmer has coauthored frequently with several scholars, including Ruben Vromans, Nadine Bol, Paul Vogt, Saar Hommes, and Marjolijn L. Antheunis.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and appear in various respected venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines," 2020, published in Computer Speech & Language
  • "Can chatbots help to motivate smoking cessation? A study on the effectiveness of motivational interviewing on engagement and therapeutic alliance," 2022, published in BMC Public Health
  • "A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference," 2020, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "A toy or a friend? Children's anthropomorphic beliefs about robots and how these relate to second-language word learning," 2020, published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • "The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility," 2020, published in Speech Communication

Krahmer has published multiple articles in journals such as the Journal of Medical Internet Research, PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, and JMIR Cancer.

Best Publications

  • Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: core tasks, applications and evaluation

    Albert Gatt;Emiel Krahmer

  • The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception.

    Emiel Krahmer;Marc Swerts

  • Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey

    Emiel Krahmer;Kees van Deemter

  • Sentence Simplification by Monolingual Machine Translation

    Sander Wubben;Antal van den Bosch;Emiel Krahmer

  • Graph-based generation of referring expressions

    Emiel Krahmer;Sebastiaan van Erk;André Verleg

  • Real versus Template-Based Natural Language Generation: A False Opposition?

    Kees Van Deemter;Emiel Krahmer;Mariët Theune

  • Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer

  • Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer;Cinzia Avesani

  • On the alleged existence of contrastive accents

    EJ Emil Krahmer;Mgj Swerts

  • Thinking about thinking aloud: a comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing

    E. Krahmer;N. Ummelen

  • A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection

    David Beaver;Emiel Krahmer

  • Facial expression and prosodic prominence: Effects of modality and facial area

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer

  • Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text

    Chris van der Lee;Albert Gatt;Emiel van Miltenburg;Sander Wubben

  • Efficient context-sensitive generation of referring expressions

    Emiel Krahmer;Mariet Theune

  • Guidelines for Designing Social Robots as Second Language Tutors

    Tony Belpaeme;Tony Belpaeme;Paul Vogt;Rianne van den Berghe;Kirsten Bergmann

  • The Role of Social Networking Sites in Early Adolescents’ Social Lives

    Marjolijn L. Antheunis;Alexander P. Schouten;Emiel Krahmer

  • Second language tutoring using social robots: a large-scale study

    Paul Vogt;Rianne van den Berghe;Mirjam de Haas;Laura Hoffman

  • Journalist versus news consumer : The perceived credibility of machine written news

    H.A.J. van der Kaa;E.J. Krahmer

  • Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines

    Chris van der Lee;Albert Gatt;Emiel van Miltenburg;Emiel Krahmer

  • Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children

    Paul Vogt;Mirjam de Haas;Chiara de Jong;Peta Baxter

  • Presupposition and Anaphora

    Emiel Krahmer

  • From data to speech: a general approach

    M. Theune;E. Klabbers;J. R. De Pijper;E. Krahmer

  • Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions

    Ruud Koolen;Albert Gatt;Albert Gatt;Martijn Goudbeek;Emiel Krahmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Swerts
Marc Swerts Tilburg University
Roger P. G. van Gompel
Roger P. G. van Gompel University of Dundee
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp
Stefan Kopp
Stefan Kopp Bielefeld University
Tony Belpaeme
Tony Belpaeme Ghent University
Ehud Reiter
Ehud Reiter University of Aberdeen
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities offers diverse online education options, enabling students to balance their studies with work and personal commitments. Many learners consider a masters in social work online, which can lead to roles focused on community support, advocacy, and clinical practice in various settings.

For those interested in mental health and behavior, accelerated psychology programs online provide a fast track into psychology careers, from research to counseling. Students aiming for counseling credentials should look for cacrep accredited schools, as CACREP accreditation is often required for licensure and assures high program standards.

Another rewarding pathway is marriage and family therapy. Earning a marriage and family therapist degree online can open doors to therapeutic work with couples and families. These degrees combine academic study with practical skills, helping graduates build meaningful, high-impact careers in today’s evolving human services landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Emiel Krahmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles