World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2924 2677 117 111 476 10847
Computer Science 51 5303 5154 80 74 442 11473

Emiel Krahmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emiel Krahmer between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emiel Krahmer published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 16.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2019. 24 of the 582 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 10 publications
1991 2025

582 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emiel Krahmer: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 3
1996 4
1997 6
1998 8
1999 7
2000 8
2001 13
2002 7
2003 9
2004 10
2005 13
2006 11
2007 25
2008 26
2009 25
2010 27
2011 25
2012 32
2013 30
2014 31
2015 19
2016 32
2017 32
2018 29
2019 37
2020 28
2021 25
2022 22
2023 10
2024 14
2025 10
Total 582
Download as CSV

Emiel Krahmer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiel Krahmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 474–483 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 476 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11 476
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Emiel Krahmer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emiel Krahmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Emiel Krahmer is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a significant focus on subfields such as artificial intelligence, general health professions, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their work explores several main topics, including:

  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies
  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Krahmer has coauthored frequently with several scholars, including Ruben Vromans, Nadine Bol, Paul Vogt, Saar Hommes, and Marjolijn L. Antheunis.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics and appear in various respected venues. Notable papers include:

  • "Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines," 2020, published in Computer Speech & Language
  • "Can chatbots help to motivate smoking cessation? A study on the effectiveness of motivational interviewing on engagement and therapeutic alliance," 2022, published in BMC Public Health
  • "A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference," 2020, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "A toy or a friend? Children's anthropomorphic beliefs about robots and how these relate to second-language word learning," 2020, published in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
  • "The interplay of prosodic cues in the L2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to L1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility," 2020, published in Speech Communication

Krahmer has published multiple articles in journals such as the Journal of Medical Internet Research, PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, and JMIR Cancer.

Best Publications

  • Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: core tasks, applications and evaluation

    Albert Gatt;Emiel Krahmer

  • The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception.

    Emiel Krahmer;Marc Swerts

  • Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey

    Emiel Krahmer;Kees van Deemter

  • Sentence Simplification by Monolingual Machine Translation

    Sander Wubben;Antal van den Bosch;Emiel Krahmer

  • Graph-based generation of referring expressions

    Emiel Krahmer;Sebastiaan van Erk;André Verleg

  • Real versus Template-Based Natural Language Generation: A False Opposition?

    Kees Van Deemter;Emiel Krahmer;Mariët Theune

  • Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer

  • Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer;Cinzia Avesani

  • On the alleged existence of contrastive accents

    EJ Emil Krahmer;Mgj Swerts

  • Thinking about thinking aloud: a comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing

    E. Krahmer;N. Ummelen

  • A Partial Account of Presupposition Projection

    David Beaver;Emiel Krahmer

  • Facial expression and prosodic prominence: Effects of modality and facial area

    Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer

  • Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text

    Chris van der Lee;Albert Gatt;Emiel van Miltenburg;Sander Wubben

  • Efficient context-sensitive generation of referring expressions

    Emiel Krahmer;Mariet Theune

  • Guidelines for Designing Social Robots as Second Language Tutors

    Tony Belpaeme;Tony Belpaeme;Paul Vogt;Rianne van den Berghe;Kirsten Bergmann

  • The Role of Social Networking Sites in Early Adolescents’ Social Lives

    Marjolijn L. Antheunis;Alexander P. Schouten;Emiel Krahmer

  • Second language tutoring using social robots: a large-scale study

    Paul Vogt;Rianne van den Berghe;Mirjam de Haas;Laura Hoffman

  • Journalist versus news consumer : The perceived credibility of machine written news

    H.A.J. van der Kaa;E.J. Krahmer

  • Human evaluation of automatically generated text: Current trends and best practice guidelines

    Chris van der Lee;Albert Gatt;Emiel van Miltenburg;Emiel Krahmer

  • Child-Robot Interactions for Second Language Tutoring to Preschool Children

    Paul Vogt;Mirjam de Haas;Chiara de Jong;Peta Baxter

  • Presupposition and Anaphora

    Emiel Krahmer

  • From data to speech: a general approach

    M. Theune;E. Klabbers;J. R. De Pijper;E. Krahmer

  • Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions

    Ruud Koolen;Albert Gatt;Albert Gatt;Martijn Goudbeek;Emiel Krahmer

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Swerts
Marc Swerts Tilburg University
Roger P. G. van Gompel
Roger P. G. van Gompel University of Dundee
Antal van den Bosch
Antal van den Bosch Radboud University
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp
Stefan Kopp
Stefan Kopp Bielefeld University
Tony Belpaeme
Tony Belpaeme Ghent University
Ehud Reiter
Ehud Reiter University of Aberdeen
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences and Humanities offers diverse online education options, enabling students to balance their studies with work and personal commitments. Many learners consider a masters in social work online, which can lead to roles focused on community support, advocacy, and clinical practice in various settings.

For those interested in mental health and behavior, accelerated psychology programs online provide a fast track into psychology careers, from research to counseling. Students aiming for counseling credentials should look for cacrep accredited schools, as CACREP accreditation is often required for licensure and assures high program standards.

Another rewarding pathway is marriage and family therapy. Earning a marriage and family therapist degree online can open doors to therapeutic work with couples and families. These degrees combine academic study with practical skills, helping graduates build meaningful, high-impact careers in today’s evolving human services landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Emiel Krahmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles