D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Computer Science D-index 39 Citations 7,991 401 World Ranking 6035 National Ranking 90
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 36 Citations 6,606 407 World Ranking 3755 National Ranking 132

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Linguistics
  • Programming language

Emiel Krahmer mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Linguistics, Perception, Natural language processing and Cognitive psychology. His biological study focuses on Referring expression generation. His Perception study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Expression, Utterance, Eyebrow and Focus.

His studies deal with areas such as Speech recognition, Task and State as well as Natural language processing. His Cognitive psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Head, Speech perception, Facial expression and Protocol analysis. His study looks at the relationship between Data science and topics such as Field, which overlap with Natural language generation.

His most cited work include:

  • Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: core tasks, applications and evaluation (320 citations)
  • Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey (254 citations)
  • The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception. (221 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Linguistics, Cognitive psychology and Perception. His work deals with themes such as Context, Speech recognition and Computer vision, which intersect with Artificial intelligence. His study in Task extends to Natural language processing with its themes.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Linguistics, Language production are connected with Psycholinguistics and other disciplines. In the subject of general Cognitive psychology, his work in Set is often linked to Perspective, thereby combining diverse domains of study. The various areas that Emiel Krahmer examines in his Perception study include Social psychology, Emotional expression, Utterance and Intonation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (27.38%)
  • Natural language processing (20.19%)
  • Linguistics (18.06%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Cognitive psychology (17.48%)
  • Artificial intelligence (27.38%)
  • Natural language processing (20.19%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Cognitive psychology, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Robot and Cancer. His Cognitive psychology research integrates issues from Language production, Perspective-taking, Rhythm and Affect. His End-to-end principle, Text generation, Computational model and Natural language generation study are his primary interests in Artificial intelligence.

His research integrates issues of Classifier, Similarity, Task and Variation in his study of Natural language processing. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including TUTOR, Gesture, Second language and Human–computer interaction. His study explores the link between Cancer and topics such as Personalization that cross with problems in Internet privacy, Cancer death and Family medicine.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Best practices for the human evaluation of automatically generated text (53 citations)
  • Second language tutoring using social robots: a large-scale study (33 citations)
  • Neural data-to-text generation: A comparison between pipeline and end-to-end architectures (22 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Linguistics
  • Programming language

His main research concerns Cognitive psychology, Natural language generation, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing and Context. His Cognitive psychology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Language production, Perspective-taking, Feature selection and Egocentrism. Emiel Krahmer interconnects Consistency, Data science and Set in the investigation of issues within Natural language generation.

Emiel Krahmer applies his multidisciplinary studies on Artificial intelligence and RDF in his research. His studies in Natural language processing integrate themes in fields like String and Task. His study focuses on the intersection of Context and fields such as Event with connections in the field of Gesture.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Survey of the state of the art in natural language generation: core tasks, applications and evaluation

Albert Gatt;Emiel Krahmer.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (2018)

558 Citations

The Effects of Visual Beats on Prosodic Prominence: Acoustic Analyses, Auditory Perception and Visual Perception.

Emiel Krahmer;Marc Swerts.
Journal of Memory and Language (2007)

363 Citations

Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey

Emiel Krahmer;Kees van Deemter.
Computational Linguistics (2012)

356 Citations

Sentence Simplification by Monolingual Machine Translation

Sander Wubben;Antal van den Bosch;Emiel Krahmer.
meeting of the association for computational linguistics (2012)

295 Citations

Graph-based generation of referring expressions

Emiel Krahmer;Sebastiaan van Erk;André Verleg.
Computational Linguistics (2003)

266 Citations

Real versus Template-Based Natural Language Generation: A False Opposition?

Kees Van Deemter;Emiel Krahmer;Mariët Theune.
Computational Linguistics (2005)

241 Citations

Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: a comparative analysis

Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer;Cinzia Avesani.
Journal of Phonetics (2002)

215 Citations

On the alleged existence of contrastive accents

EJ Emil Krahmer;Mgj Swerts.
Speech Communication (2001)

212 Citations

Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing

Marc Swerts;Emiel Krahmer.
Journal of Memory and Language (2005)

207 Citations

Efficient context-sensitive generation of referring expressions

Emiel Krahmer;Mariet Theune.
Information Sharing: Reference and Presupposition in Language Generation and Interpretation, Center for the Study of Language and Information-Lecture Notes (2002)

179 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Emiel Krahmer

Kees van Deemter

Kees van Deemter

Utrecht University

Publications: 54

Pilar Prieto

Pilar Prieto

Pompeu Fabra University

Publications: 34

Ehud Reiter

Ehud Reiter

University of Aberdeen

Publications: 30

Asli Ozyurek

Asli Ozyurek

Max Planck Society

Publications: 27

Robert Dale

Robert Dale

Macquarie University

Publications: 18

Diane J. Litman

Diane J. Litman

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 18

Kristian J. Hammond

Kristian J. Hammond

Northwestern University

Publications: 16

Chris Callison-Burch

Chris Callison-Burch

University of Pennsylvania

Publications: 16

Lawrence A. Birnbaum

Lawrence A. Birnbaum

Northwestern University

Publications: 15

Christopher Potts

Christopher Potts

Stanford University

Publications: 14

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets

Tilburg University

Publications: 14

Julia Hirschberg

Julia Hirschberg

Columbia University

Publications: 13

Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo

University of Paderborn

Publications: 13

Chris Mellish

Chris Mellish

University of Aberdeen

Publications: 11

Alexander I. Rudnicky

Alexander I. Rudnicky

Carnegie Mellon University

Publications: 10

Horacio Saggion

Horacio Saggion

Pompeu Fabra University

Publications: 10

Trending Scientists

Xueqi Cheng

Xueqi Cheng

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ralph F. Osterhout

Ralph F. Osterhout

Microsoft (United States)

Changsheng Zhao

Changsheng Zhao

Sichuan University

Kwangyeol Lee

Kwangyeol Lee

Korea University

Michael V. Pishko

Michael V. Pishko

Texas A&M University

Heiko Vogel

Heiko Vogel

Max Planck Society

William Byerley

William Byerley

University of California, San Francisco

Lothar Hennighausen

Lothar Hennighausen

National Institutes of Health

Zhongfu Ni

Zhongfu Ni

China Agricultural University

Klaus Raschke

Klaus Raschke

University of Göttingen

Miren P. Cajaraville

Miren P. Cajaraville

University of the Basque Country

Jonathan Crosier

Jonathan Crosier

University of Manchester

Daniela M. Barros

Daniela M. Barros

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Kyriakos S. Markides

Kyriakos S. Markides

The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

Gerd Hasenfuss

Gerd Hasenfuss

University of Göttingen

Michael Landthaler

Michael Landthaler

University of Regensburg

Something went wrong. Please try again later.