World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antal van den Bosch

Antal van den Bosch

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7719
World Ranking
9649
National Ranking
174

Antal van den Bosch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antal van den Bosch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 242 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Antal van den Bosch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antal van den Bosch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antal van den Bosch is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Social Sciences, Computer Science, and Psychology, with a focus on interdisciplinary approaches.

The scientist's subfields of study encompass Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Communication, and Social Psychology.

Key topics in their research include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration

Recent publications by Antal van den Bosch cover a range of contemporary issues and methodologies in language and cognition research:

  • "Monitoring stance towards vaccination in twitter messages" (2020), Radboud Repository (Radboud University)
  • "Observe, inspect, modify: Three conditions for generative AI governance" (2023), New Media & Society
  • "Distinguishing Syntactic Operations in the Brain: Dependency and Phrase-Structure Parsing" (2020), Neurobiology of Language
  • "Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants" (2022), Neurobiology of Language
  • "Unsupervised Text Segmentation Predicts Eye Fixations During Reading" (2022), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Cedric Waterschoot, Florian Kunneman, Dirk Speelman, Stefan L. Frank, and Robbert De Troij.

Prominent venues for publication in their career include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neurobiology of Language
  • Natural Language Engineering
  • New Media & Society
  • Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner

    Ilk;Walter Daelemans;Jakub Zavrel;Ko van der Sloot

  • Forgetting Exceptions is Harmful in Language Learning

    Walter Daelemans;Antal Van Den Bosch;Jakub Zavrel

  • Sentence Simplification by Monolingual Machine Translation

    Sander Wubben;Antal van den Bosch;Emiel Krahmer

  • An efficient memory-based morphosyntactic tagger and parser for Dutch

    Antal van den Bosch;Bertjan Busser;Sander Canisius;Walter Daelemans

  • The perfect solution for detecting sarcasm in tweets #not

    Christine Liebrecht;Florian Kunneman;Antal Van den Bosch

  • Recommending scientific articles using citeulike

    Toine Bogers;Antal van den Bosch

  • IGTree: using trees for compression and classification in lazy learning algorithms

    Walter Daelemans;Antal van den Bosch;Ton Weijters

  • Broad expertise retrieval in sparse data environments

    Krisztian Balog;Toine Bogers;Leif Azzopardi;Maarten de Rijke

  • Language-Independent Data-Oriented Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion

    Walter M. P. Daelemans;Antal P. J. van den Bosch

  • GAMBL, Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Memory-Based WSD

    Bart Decadt;Véronique Hoste;Walter Daelemans;Antal van den Bosch

  • Data-oriented methods for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion

    Antal van den Bosch;Walter Daelemans

  • Arabic Computational Morphology: Knowledge-based and Empirical Methods

    Abdelhadi Soudi;Antal van den Bosch;Gunter Neumann

  • Memory-Based Morphological Analysis

    Antal van den Bosch;Walter Daelemans

  • A Rule-Based Approach for Process Discovery: Dealing with Noise and Imbalance in Process Logs

    Laura Măruşter;A. J. Weijters;Wil M. Aalst;Antal Bosch

  • Text analytics in industry

    Ashwin Ittoo;Le Minh Nguyen;Antal van den Bosch

  • Signaling sarcasm

    Florian Kunneman;Christine Liebrecht;Margot van Mulken;Antal van den Bosch

  • Process Mining: Discovering Direct Successors in Process Logs

    Laura Maruster;A. J. M. M. Weijters;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Antal van den Bosch

  • Estimating search engine index size variability: a 9-year longitudinal study

    Antal Bosch;Toine Bogers;Maurice Kunder

  • Parameter optimization for machine-learning of word sense disambiguation

    V. Hoste;I. Hendrickx;W. Daelemans;A. Van Den Bosch

  • Language Identification and Morphosyntactic Tagging: The Second VarDial Evaluation Campaign

    Marcos Zampieri;Shervin Malmasi;Preslav Nakov;Ahmed Ali

  • Memory-based language processing

    Walter Daelemans;Antal van den Bosch

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp
Emiel Krahmer
Emiel Krahmer Tilburg University
Andy Way
Andy Way Dublin City University
Roel M. Willems
Roel M. Willems Radboud University
Veronique Hoste
Veronique Hoste Ghent University
Krisztian Balog
Krisztian Balog University of Stavanger
Maarten de Rijke
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various flexible and accessible education options. Many students are now considering affordable online degree programs, which allow you to gain a quality education without the high costs often associated with traditional universities. These programs make it easier for students from diverse backgrounds to pursue their goals.

Concerned about admission requirements? Some online graduate schools with low gpa requirements offer flexible entry points, making advanced study more accessible to those who may not have a perfect academic history.

An online computer science degree can help you fast-track your career in high-demand fields such as software development, cybersecurity, and data analysis. If you’re interested in technology’s impact on the world, you might also wonder what can you do with an environmental science major, as tech skills are highly valued in environmental research and innovation.

By exploring these online learning options, you can tailor your education to align with your career path and personal circumstances, making your journey in computer science more accessible and rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing Antal van den Bosch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles