World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
81
Citations
23686
World Ranking
402
National Ranking
132

Matthew W. Blair publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew W. Blair sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 252 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Matthew W. Blair D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew W. Blair sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Phaseolus, Quantitative trait locus, Agronomy, Genetics and Plant breeding. His Phaseolus study is concerned with the field of Botany as a whole. Matthew W. Blair has researched Quantitative trait locus in several fields, including Genome, Biofortification, Inbred strain and Animal science.

His work deals with themes such as Genetic variability and Abiotic component, which intersect with Agronomy. His Genetics research includes elements of Gene pool and Genetic diversity. His Plant breeding research also works with subjects such as

  • Biotechnology which intersects with area such as Agriculture, Crop and Germplasm,
  • Abiotic stress which intersects with area such as Adaptation.

His most cited work include:

  • Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - model food legumes (897 citations)
  • A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications (689 citations)
  • MICROSATELLITE MARKER DEVELOPMENT, MAPPING AND APPLICATIONS IN RICE GENETICS AND BREEDING (410 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Phaseolus, Genetics, Agronomy, Botany and Microsatellite. His Phaseolus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Quantitative trait locus, Legume, Biofortification and Drought tolerance. His Quantitative trait locus research includes themes of Inbred strain and Candidate gene.

His research investigates the link between Genetics and topics such as Genetic diversity that cross with problems in Genetic variation. Matthew W. Blair works mostly in the field of Microsatellite, limiting it down to concerns involving Introgression and, occasionally, Backcrossing. His study in Germplasm is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Domestication, Biotechnology and Agriculture.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Phaseolus (43.17%)
  • Genetics (43.61%)
  • Agronomy (31.72%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Germplasm (17.62%)
  • Crop (9.69%)
  • Agronomy (31.72%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Matthew W. Blair spends much of his time researching Germplasm, Crop, Agronomy, Horticulture and Phaseolus. His studies in Germplasm integrate themes in fields like Domestication, Abiotic component, Biotechnology and Genetic diversity. His Biotechnology research integrates issues from Genetic marker, Microsatellite, Analysis of molecular variance and Plant breeding.

His research in Agronomy intersects with topics in Agriculture, Agroforestry and Genotype. His Phaseolus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Quantitative trait locus, Legume and Drought tolerance. His Quantitative trait locus study results in a more complete grasp of Genetics.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Landrace Germplasm for Improving Yield and Abiotic Stress Adaptation (136 citations)
  • Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia (44 citations)
  • Identification of an ERECTA gene and its drought adaptation associations with wild and cultivated common bean. (30 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

Matthew W. Blair mostly deals with Phaseolus, Germplasm, Botany, Drought tolerance and Agronomy. His research integrates issues of Quantitative trait locus, Domestication and Legume in his study of Phaseolus. The Germplasm study combines topics in areas such as Genetic diversity, Biotechnology, Plant breeding, Abiotic stress and Abiotic component.

Microbiology is closely connected to Gene in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Botany. Matthew W. Blair studied Drought tolerance and Adaptation that intersect with Genetic variation, Gene pool, Growing season and Genetic correlation. His Genetics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Amaranthus cruentus and Amaranth.

Best Publications

  • Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - model food legumes

    W.J. Broughton;G. Hernández;Matthew W. Blair;Stephen E. Beebe

  • A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications

    Jeremy Schmutz;Phillip E McClean;Sujan Mamidi;G Albert Wu

  • MICROSATELLITE MARKER DEVELOPMENT, MAPPING AND APPLICATIONS IN RICE GENETICS AND BREEDING

    Susan R. McCouch;Xiuli Chen;Olivier Panaud;Svetlana Temnykh

  • Common bean breeding for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: From classical to MAS breeding

    Phillip N. Miklas;James D. Kelly;Steve E. Beebe;Matthew W. Blair

  • Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

    M. W. Blair;O. Panaud;S. R. McCouch

  • Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought.

    Stephen E. Beebe;Idupulapati M. Rao;Matthew W. Blair;Jorge A. Acosta-Gallegos

  • Nodular diagnosis for ecological engineering of the symbiotic nitrogen fixation with legumes

    Jean Jacques Drevon;Nora Alkama;Adelson Araujo;Steve Beebe

  • Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    M. W. Blair;F. Pedraza;H. F. Buendia;E. Gaitán-Solís

  • Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding

    Petr Smýkal;Clarice J. Coyne;Mike J. Ambrose;Nigel Maxted

  • Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants.

    Lara Ramaekers;Roseline Remans;Idupulapati M. Rao;Matthew W. Blair

  • Landrace Germplasm for Improving Yield and Abiotic Stress Adaptation

    Sangam L. Dwivedi;Salvatore Ceccarelli;Matthew W. Blair;Hari D. Upadhyaya

  • The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed

    Petr Smýkal;Vanessa Vernoud;Matthew W. Blair;Aleš Soukup

  • Microsatellite marker diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    M. W. Blair;M. C. Giraldo;H. F. Buendía;E. Tovar

  • Quantitative Trait Loci for Root Architecture Traits Correlated with Phosphorus Acquisition in Common Bean

    Stephen E. Beebe;Marcela Rojas-Pierce;Xiaolong Yan;Matthew W. Blair

  • QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean

    Xiaolong Yan;Hong Liao;Stephen E. Beebe;Matthew W. Blair

  • Genetic mapping of basal root gravitropism and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in common bean

    Hong Liao;Xiaolong Yan;Gerardo Rubio;Steve E. Beebe

  • Genetic diversity, inter-gene pool introgression and nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Central Africa.

    Matthew W. Blair;Laura F. González;Paul M. Kimani;Louis Butare

  • Inheritance of seed iron and zinc concentrations in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    M. W. Blair;C. Astudillo;M. A. Grusak;R. Graham

  • Genetic diversity, seed size associations and population structure of a core collection of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

    Matthew W. Blair;Lucy M. Díaz;Hector F. Buendía;Myriam C. Duque

  • Physiological and genetic analysis of root responsiveness to auxin-producing plant growth-promoting bacteria in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    Roseline Remans;Steve Beebe;Matthew Blair;German Manrique

  • Genomics of Phaseolus Beans, a Major Source of Dietary Protein and Micronutrients in the Tropics

    Paul Gepts;Francisco J.L. Aragão;Everaldo de Barros;Matthew W. Blair

  • Genetic diversity and population structure of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from the East African highlands

    Asrat Asfaw;Matthew W. Blair;Conny Almekinders

  • Screening of iron bioavailability patterns in eight bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes using the Caco-2 cell in vitro model.

    Magnolia Ariza-Nieto;Matthew W. Blair;Ross M. Welch;Raymond P. Glahn

  • Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes for drought stress adaptation in Ethiopia

    Kwabena Darkwa;Kwabena Darkwa;Daniel Ambachew;Hussein Mohammed;Asrat Asfaw

  • QTL Analysis of Adventitious Root Formation in Common Bean under Contrasting Phosphorus Availability

    Ivan E. Ochoa;Matthew W. Blair;Jonathan P. Lynch

  • Extensive ribosomal DNA amplification during Andean common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) evolution

    Andrea Pedrosa-Harand;Cícero C. Souza de Almeida;Magdalena Mosiolek;Magdalena Mosiolek;Matthew W. Blair

  • Sequencing and Analysis of Common Bean ESTs. Building a Foundation for Functional Genomics

    Mario Ramírez;Michelle A. Graham;Lourdes Blanco-López;Sonia Silvente

  • Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants [Approved article]

    Lara Ramaekers;Roseline Remans;Idupulapati Madhusudana Rao;Matthew W. Blair

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen E. Beebe
Stephen E. Beebe Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Idupulapati M. Rao
Idupulapati M. Rao Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Karen A. Cichy
Karen A. Cichy Agricultural Research Service
Phillip N. Miklas
Phillip N. Miklas Agricultural Research Service
Paul Gepts
Paul Gepts University of California, Davis
Hari D. Upadhyaya
Hari D. Upadhyaya International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Jonathan P. Lynch
Jonathan P. Lynch Pennsylvania State University
Susan R. McCouch
Susan R. McCouch Cornell University
Rodomiro Ortiz
Rodomiro Ortiz Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Rajeev K. Varshney
Rajeev K. Varshney Murdoch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthew W. Blair

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles