World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
11060
World Ranking
13894
National Ranking
5872

Raymond P. Glahn publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond P. Glahn sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Raymond P. Glahn D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond P. Glahn sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond P. Glahn is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with notable expertise in plant science. Glahn's contributions extend into nutrition and dietetics, hematology, food science, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to their work.

The scientist's recent publications include studies that address iron bioavailability, plant micronutrient interactions, and food system proteins. Selected recent papers are:

  • Impact of Ascorbic Acid on the In Vitro Iron Bioavailability of a Casein-Based Iron Fortificant, 2020, Nutrients
  • Iron Concentrations in Biofortified Beans and Nonbiofortified Marketplace Varieties in East Africa Are Similar, 2020, Journal of Nutrition
  • Nicotianamine-chelated iron positively affects iron status, intestinal morphology and microbial populations in vivo (Gallus gallus), 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Effect of Rice GDP-L-Galactose Phosphorylase Constitutive Overexpression on Ascorbate Concentration, Stress Tolerance, and Iron Bioavailability in Rice, 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Redefining Bean Iron Biofortification: A Review of the Evidence for Moving to a High Fe Bioavailability Approach, 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Glahn include:

  • Jason A. Wiesinger
  • Karen A. Cichy
  • Sharon Hooper
  • Miguel A. Piñeros
  • Jesse T. Beasley

The scientist has contributed to publications in several venues, evidencing a breadth of study across related fields. Common publication venues are:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Journal of Functional Foods
  • Research Square
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

Glahn's main fields of study reflect a focus on agricultural and biological sciences. Within these, subfields of particular concentration include plant science, nutrition and dietetics, hematology, food science, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Key topics in Glahn's research encompass:

  • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Phytase and its Applications
  • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Proteins in Food Systems
  • Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Agricultural pest management studies
  • Food composition and properties

Best Publications

  • Caco-2 Cell Ferritin Formation Predicts Nonradiolabeled Food Iron Availability in an In Vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Cell Culture Model

    Raymond P. Glahn;Olivia A. Lee;Andrew Yeung;Matthew I. Goldman

  • Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles affects iron absorption

    Gretchen J. Mahler;Mandy B. Esch;Elad Tako;Teresa L. Southard

  • Biofortified indica rice attains iron and zinc nutrition dietary targets in the field.

    Kurniawan R Trijatmiko;Conrado Duenas;Nikolaos Tsakirpaloglou;Lina Torrizo

  • Endosperm-specific co-expression of recombinant soybean ferritin and Aspergillus phytase in maize results in significant increases in the levels of bioavailable iron.

    Georgia Drakakaki;Sylvain Marcel;Raymond P. Glahn;Elizabeth K. Lund

  • Characterization of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cocultures in an in vitro digestion/cell culture model used to predict iron bioavailability

    Gretchen J. Mahler;Michael L. Shuler;Raymond P. Glahn

  • Caco-2 Cell Iron Uptake from Meat and Casein Digests Parallels in Vivo Studies: Use of a Novel in Vitro Method for Rapid Estimation of Iron Bioavailability

    Raymond P. Glahn;Elizabeth M. Wien;Darrell R. van Campen;Dennis D. Miller

  • Characterization of a gastrointestinal tract microscale cell culture analog used to predict drug toxicity

    Gretchen J. Mahler;Mandy B. Esch;Raymond P. Glahn;Michael L. Shuler

  • Inhibition of iron uptake by phytic acid, tannic acid, and ZnCl2: studies using an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell model.

    Raymond P Glahn;Gary M Wortley;Paul K South;Dennis D Miller

  • An In Vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Cell Culture System Accurately Predicts the Effects of Ascorbic Acid and Polyphenolic Compounds on Iron Bioavailability in Humans

    Shumei Yun;Jean-Pierre Habicht;Dennis D. Miller;Raymond P. Glahn

  • Nicotianamine, a Novel Enhancer of Rice Iron Bioavailability to Humans

    Luqing Zheng;Zhiqiang Cheng;Chunxiang Ai;Xinhang Jiang

  • Assessment of carotenoid bioavailability of whole foods using a Caco-2 cell culture model coupled with an in vitro digestion.

    Chang-Shu Liu;Raymond P Glahn;Rui Hai Liu

  • Chronic Zinc Deficiency Alters Chick Gut Microbiota Composition and Function.

    Spenser Reed;Hadar Neuman;Sharon Moscovich;Raymond P. Glahn

  • Dietary inulin affects the expression of intestinal enterocyte iron transporters, receptors and storage protein and alters the microbiota in the pig intestine.

    E. Tako;R. P. Glahn;R. M. Welch;X. Lei

  • Screening of iron bioavailability patterns in eight bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes using the Caco-2 cell in vitro model.

    Magnolia Ariza-Nieto;Matthew W. Blair;Ross M. Welch;Raymond P. Glahn

  • A Phaseolus vulgaris Diversity Panel for Andean Bean Improvement

    Karen A. Cichy;Karen A. Cichy;Timothy G. Porch;James S. Beaver;Perry Cregan

  • Comparison of iron bioavailability from 15 rice genotypes: studies using an in vitro digestion/caco-2 cell culture model.

    Raymond P Glahn;Zhiqiang Cheng;Ross M Welch;Glenn B Gregorio

  • Serum hepcidin is significantly associated with iron absorption from food and supplemental sources in healthy young women

    Melissa F Young;Raymond P Glahn;Magnolia Ariza-Nieto;Jeremy Inglis

  • The potential of lentil (Lens culinaris L.) as a whole food for increased selenium, iron, and zinc intake: preliminary results from a 3 year study

    Dil Thavarajah;Pushparajah Thavarajah;Asoka Wejesuriya;Michael Rutzke

  • Iron Uptake Is Enhanced in Caco-2 Cell Monolayers by Cysteine and Reduced Cysteinyl Glycine

    Raymond P. Glahn;Darrell R. Van Campen

  • Decreased Citrate Improves Iron Availability from Infant Formula: Application of an In Vitro Digestion/Caco-2 Cell Culture Model

    Raymond P. Glahn;Cindy Lai;Jean Hsu;John F. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis D. Miller
Dennis D. Miller Cornell University
Ross M. Welch
Ross M. Welch Cornell University
Karen A. Cichy
Karen A. Cichy Agricultural Research Service
Xin Gen Lei
Xin Gen Lei Cornell University
Albert Vandenberg
Albert Vandenberg University of Saskatchewan
Leon V. Kochian
Leon V. Kochian University of Saskatchewan
Abebe Menkir
Abebe Menkir International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
Michael L. Shuler
Michael L. Shuler Cornell University
Rebecca J. Stoltzfus
Rebecca J. Stoltzfus Cornell University
Omry Koren
Omry Koren Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Raymond P. Glahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles