World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
6841
World Ranking
5898
National Ranking
457

A. J. George Nurser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. J. George Nurser sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 86 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

A. J. George Nurser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. J. George Nurser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

A. J. George Nurser is affiliated with the National Oceanography Centre in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on Oceanography and Global and Planetary Change. Additional areas of study include Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics related to climate and environmental processes. Key research themes include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Publications by Nurser appear in multiple scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Ocean Modelling
  • Journal of Climate
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Scientific Reports

Selected recent papers demonstrate a range of research interests and collaborations. These include:

  • "Spin-up of UK Earth System Model 1 (UKESM1) for CMIP6", 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Evaluating the physical and biogeochemical state of the global ocean component of UKESM1 in CMIP6 historical simulations", 2021, Geoscientific Model Development
  • "Galápagos upwelling driven by localized wind-front interactions", 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "The impact of a parameterisation of submesoscale mixed layer eddies on mixed layer depths in the NEMO ocean model", 2020, Ocean Modelling
  • "Signature of Ocean Warming at the Mixed Layer Base", 2020, Geophysical Research Letters

Nurser has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Andrew C. Coward
  • Andrew Yool
  • Adam T. Blaker
  • Louis Clément
  • Elaine L. McDonagh

Best Publications

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part I: Mean states

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;David Bailey;Erik Behrens

  • OMIP contribution to CMIP6: experimental and diagnostic protocol for the physical component of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project

    Stephen M. Griffies;Gokhan Danabasoglu;Paul J. Durack;Alistair J. Adcroft

  • On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Ekaterina E. Popova;Andrew Yool;A.J. George Nurser

  • Inferring the Subduction Rate and Period over the North Atlantic

    John C. Marshall;Richard G. Williams;A. J. George Nurser

  • The Rossby radius in the Arctic Ocean

    A. J. G. Nurser;S. Bacon

  • The Arctic Circumpolar Boundary Current

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;Vladimir V. Ivanov;A. J. George Nurser;Sheldon Bacon

  • North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to decadal variability

    Gokhan Danabasoglu;Steve G. Yeager;Who M. Kim;Erik Behrens

  • An assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional overturning circulation during 1958–2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Riccardo Farneti;Stephanie M. Downes;Stephen M. Griffies;Simon J. Marsland

  • A boundary-value problem for the parameterized mesoscale eddy transport

    Raffaele Ferrari;Stephen M. Griffies;A.J. George Nurser;Geoffrey K. Vallis

  • Global rate and spectral characteristics of internal gravity wave generation by geostrophic flow over topography

    R.B. Scott;R.B. Scott;J.A. Goff;A.C. Naveira Garabato;Aylmer J.G. Nurser

  • Diagnosing Water Mass Formation from Air–Sea Fluxes and Surface Mixing

    A. J. G. Nurser;Robert Marsh;Richard G. Williams

  • Seasonality of submesoscale flows in the ocean surface boundary layer

    Christian E. Buckingham;Alberto C. Naveira Garabato;Andrew F. Thompson;Liam Brannigan

  • On the Consumption of Antarctic Bottom Water in the Abyssal Ocean

    Casimir de Lavergne;Gurvan Madec;Julien Le Sommer;A. J. George Nurser

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part III: Hydrography and fluxes

    Mehmet Ilıcak;Helge Drange;Helge Drange;Qiang Wang;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • An assessment of global and regional sea level for years 1993-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations

    Stephen M. Griffies;Jianjun Yin;Paul J. Durack;Paul Goddard

  • Surface warming hiatus caused by increased heat uptake across multiple ocean basins

    S. S. Drijfhout;A. T. Blaker;S. A. Josey;A. J. G. Nurser

  • Fluid Dynamics of Oceanic Thermocline Ventilation

    John C. Marshall;A. J. George Nurser

  • Rapid sea-level rise along the Antarctic margins in response to increased glacial discharge

    Craig D. Rye;Alberto C. Naveira Garabato;Paul R. Holland;Michael P. Meredith;Michael P. Meredith

  • Arctic pathways of Pacific Water: Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison experiments

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Michael Karcher;Andrey Proshutinsky;Rüdiger Gerdes

  • The Impact of a Variable Mixing Efficiency on the Abyssal Overturning

    Casimir de Lavergne;Gurvan Madec;Julien Le Sommer;A. J. George Nurser

  • The North Atlantic inflow to the Arctic Ocean: High-resolution model study

    Yevgeny Aksenov;Sheldon Bacon;Andrew C. Coward;A.J. George Nurser

  • An assessment of the Arctic Ocean in a suite of interannual CORE-II simulations. Part I: Sea ice and solid freshwater

    Qiang Wang;Mehmet Ilicak;Rüdiger Gerdes;Helge Drange

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew C. Coward
Andrew C. Coward National Oceanography Centre
Simona Masina
Simona Masina Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
Stephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Yevgeny Aksenov
Yevgeny Aksenov National Oceanography Centre
Helge Drange
Helge Drange University of Bergen
Alberto C. Naveira Garabato
Alberto C. Naveira Garabato University of Southampton
William G. Large
William G. Large National Center for Atmospheric Research
Eric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet Florida State University
Hiroyuki Tsujino
Hiroyuki Tsujino Japan Meteorological Agency
Gokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide diverse career options and flexible learning paths. Programs like affordable dsw programs offer advanced training focused on social work, which can complement environmental advocacy and community engagement roles.

If you prefer a broader academic foundation, an online general studies degree affordable option may suit your needs. These programs provide interdisciplinary knowledge that can be tailored to environmental themes, preparing students for various professional settings.

For those seeking quicker entry into the workforce, some students consider the easiest bachelor degree to get. While perceptions vary, it's important to assess program quality alongside ease of completion to ensure meaningful career outcomes.

Specialized degrees like online geology degrees are closely aligned with environmental science fields. They offer focused training on earth systems which is vital for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing A. J. George Nurser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles